目的 探讨捆绑式胰肠吻合术的改良方法。方法 对8例胰十二指肠切除术患者行捆绑式胰肠吻合术时采用带血管蒂的大网膜包绕空肠浆肌鞘，以达捆绑之目的。8例中行桥袢空肠造瘘5例，胆总管造口T管引流3例，并观察其术后5 d内每天平均引流液量。结果 8例患者均治愈出院，无胰瘘、胆瘘发生； 5 d内每天平均引流液量除第1天胆总管造口低于空肠造瘘外，其余4 d每天平均引流液量均明显高于空肠造瘘； 1例空肠造瘘者术后第8天继发胰腺残端出血，经电灼后止血。结论 带血管蒂的大网膜包绕空肠浆肌鞘完全可以代替粗线环绕空肠结扎，并使整个空肠浆肌鞘与胰腺紧贴，更利于胰肠间愈合； 空肠造瘘或胆总管造口对桥袢空肠均有减压引流的作用，但T管引流更简单、有效、省时。
目的探讨保留幽门的胰十二指肠切除术(PPPD)的手术适应证、捆绑式胰肠吻合术的特点及胃排空障碍的治疗。方法12例均行PPPD，消化道重建按Child法，胰肠吻合均采用捆绑式胰肠吻合。结果除1例术后第21天并发切口裂开、肺栓塞死亡外，其余11例均顺利出院，平均住院时间24 d，随访1年，1例术后8个月死亡，余均健在。结论PPPD是治疗胰头癌及壶腹周围癌的一种具有广阔应用前景的术式，捆绑式胰肠吻合有望作为胰肠吻合的标准术式。
Objective To analyze the difference in the incidence of postoperative pancreatic leakage and anasto-motic bleeding complications in various methods of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy （PD）. Methods The clinical data of 526 patients underwent pancreaticojejunostomy from January 2008 to September 2012 in this hospital were analyzed retrospectively. End-to-side “pancreatic duct to jejunum mucosa-to-mucosa” anastomosis （abbreviation：mucosa-to-mucosa anastomosis） was performed in 359 patients， which contained 149 patients with internal drainage， 130 patients with external drainage， and 80 patients with no drainage. End-to-side invaginated anastomosis was performedin 165 patients without drainage. In addition， side-to-side anastomosis was performed in 2 patients without drainage.Results There were 34 cases （6.46%） of pancreatic leakage， 8 cases （1.52%） of anastomotic bleeding in pancreaticoje-junostomy， and 32 cases of death （6.08%）. ① The pancreatic leakage rate of mucosa-to-mucosa anastomosis was signi-ficantly lower than that of end-to-side invaginated anastomosis 〔4.18% （15/359） versus 11.52% （19/165）， χ2=10.029， P=0.002〕. There was no significant difference of the anastomotic bleeding incidence between mucosa-to-mucosa anasto-mosis and end-to-side invaginated anastomosis 〔1.67% （6/359） versus 1.21% （2/165）， χ2=0.159， P=0.691〕. ② In the mucosa-to-mucosa anastomosis group， the pancreatic leakage rates in the ones with internal drainage and external drainage were lower than those in the ones without drainage， respectively （2.68% （4/149） versus 11.25% （9/80）， χ2=7.132， P=0.008；1.54% （2/130） versus 11.25% （9/80）， χ2=9.410， P=0.002）；which was no significant difference between the ones with internal drainage and external drainage 〔2.68% （4/149） versus 1.54% （2/130）， χ2=0.433， P=0.510〕. But there were no significant differences for both the pancreatic leakage 〔2.68% （4/149） versus 1.54% （2/130）， χ2=0.433， P=0.510〕and anastomotic bleeding incidence 〔2.68% （4/149） versus 1.54% （2/130）， χ2=0.433， P=0.510〕 between the ones with internal drainage and external drainage. Conclusions Mucosa-to-mucosa anastomosis has a lower pancreatic leakage incidence as compared with end-to-side invaginated anastomosis. However， there is no significant difference of the anast-omotic bleeding incidence. Internal or external drainage could reduce the incidence of pancreatic leakage， but have no obvious effect to the anastomotic bleeding incidence.
Objective To investigate the historical evolution and the research progress of pancreaticoenterostomy method in the pancreaticoduodenectomy. Methods The related literatures of PubMed， EMBASE， Wanfang， CNKI， and VIP databases were retrieved and reviewed. The advantages and disadvantages of various pancreaticojejunostomy type in pancreaticoduodenectomy were summarized. Results The type of pancreaticoenterostomy is the major influence factors for the pancreaticoduodenectomy success or failure and the patients’s recovery. Conclusion According to the specific cases， the type of pancreaticojejunostomy in skilled operation is the key to success.
Objective To investigate the effect of the duct-to-mucosa anastomosis in invaginating end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy. Methods A retrospective review was conducted for 200 patients treated with pancreaticoduod-enectomy （PD） between August 2005 and December 2012. Reconstruction of digestive tract in PD was done according to the method described by Child. The duct-to-mucosa anastomosis was applied in the invaginating end-to-side pancrea-ticojejunostomy. The outline of the anastomosis structures was as follows：anastomosis of pancreatic duct and jejunal mucosa， anastomosis of pancreatic and jejunal resection margin， and anastomosis of pancreas and jejunal seromuscular layer. A cilicone tube was put into the pancreatic duct and lead to the jejunum. The anastomotic stoma was covered with part of the omentum majus, and put a drainage tube under the anastomotic stoma. Results The operation went smoothly，and no deaths occurred during perioperative period. The surgical time was 280-420 min， the average time was （298±77） min. The pancreatic fistula were observed in 22 patients （11%）， including 17 patients in Grade A， 2 patients in Grade B， and 3 patients in Grade C. The other complications were observed in 19 patients， including 16 patients with addominal infection， 1 patient with bleeding from splenic vein， 1 patient with bleeding from ruptured of pseudoaneurysm at biliary intestinal anastomosis， 1 patient with abdominal abscess. Three patients with pancreatic fistula in Grade C were cured by reoperation, and the other patients with pancreatic fistula were cured by expectant treatment. Conclusions The duct-to-mucosa anastomosis in invaginating end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy is a simple and safe procedure that has the advantage in reducing the incidence of the pancreatic fistula. Using omentum to cover the anastomotic could localize the diffusion of panreactic fistula， and reduce the incidence of serious complications caused by pancreatic fistula.
Objective To summarize the experiences in diagnosis and treatment for iatrogenic injury of cholodocho-pancreatico-duodenal junction （CPDJ）. Method The clinical data of 9 patients with CPDJ injury were analyzed retro-spectively. Results Double lumen tube drainage was emplaced in all the operations. Nutrition support and inhibitor ofpancreatic secretion were applied in all the patients. ①CPDJ injuries were observed intraoperatively for 6 out of 9 patientswith CPDJ injury. Two patients with simple perforation of posterior wall of common bile duct inferior segment and 2patients with simple duodenal perforation who were treated by perforation repair， common bile duct T tube drainage， andperitoneal drainage. Two cases of bile duct or duodenal injury with pancreatic injury were treated by choledochojejunostomyand BillrothⅡgastrojejunostomy. These 6 patients with CPDJ injury were cured and none of case was death. ②Injuries of CPDJ were observed postoperatively for 3 out of 9 patients with CPDJ injury. Total bile diversion or total bile diversion with duodenal diverticulum were performed in 2 cases of bile duct or duodenal injury with pancreatic injury， respectively. The one with total bile diversion only was died of abdominal infection， duodenal fistula， wound dehiscence， abdominal and upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding， and multiple organ failure；the one with total bile diversion with duodenal diverticulum and the one with sequent PTCD and choledochojejunostomy for biliary obstruction caused by operation ofgigantic duodenal interstitialoma were cured. Conclusions CPDJ injury usually occurs in biliary duct exploration， endoscopic sphincterectomy or duodenal operation. It is easily misdiagnosed and serious consequences may happen from this. Timely and correct treatment should be taken according to the specific injury observed during or after the operation.
目的 探讨捆绑式胰肠吻合术在预防胰十二指肠切除术后胰肠吻合口漏的可行性及临床应用价值。 方法 我院在2002年3月至2006年10月期间对32例胰十二指肠切除术患者采用捆绑式胰肠吻合术。结果 32例患者手术均顺利，无一例发生胰瘘，无手术死亡病例。 术后发生胆瘘2例，经腹腔引流治愈。结论 捆绑式胰肠吻合术操作简便，预防胰瘘效果可靠，值得推广。