Objective To investigate present status of health care in peri-brain-death and analyze its effectiveness and health economic characteristics. Method Retrospective analysis of case series was conducted and a total of 940 patients from surgical intensive care unit (SICU) were reviewed on treatment and part of direct medical expenditure. The patients admitted from Jun. 1999 to Dec. 2000 and Nov. 2001 to Jun. 2002 were included in this study. Data were processed by SPSS 10.0. Results Patients were included if they had two of the three symptoms for at least one hour: deep coma, pupillar light reflex disappear, and no autonomic respiratory. Ultimately 115 patients were included, with a total cost of ￥2 515.9 per day for each case, whereas mortality was 99.10%. Mortality increased with the state of peri-brain-death prolonged. Eighty percent of patients included were dead within 72 hours after admission. Conclusions Attempts to resuscitate patients of peri-brain-death have been the most widely applied in China, however, it resulted in great unnecessary consumption of health resources. It is of great importance to promote legislation of brain death in China.
Objective We aimed to investigate the attitude and suggestion from doctors, pharmacists and civil servants concerning brain death and organ transplantation and the legislation. Methods A questionnaire with 10 sections and 44 questions was designed and distributed. The effective questionnaire data was then recorded and checked for descriptive analysis. Results In 1 400 questionnaires distributed, 1 063 were responded and 969 of them were valid and analyzed. The respondents showed an incomplete understanding of brain death and organ transplantation laws. Seventy-four percent of the respondents recognized and accepted the standard of brain death. They agreed that legislation should be involved in the removal of organs for transplantation, the future use of the organs, and insurance and compensation for the donor for possible health risks induced by organ removal. Of the 969 respondents, 92% considered it necessary to have legislation in brain death and organ transplantation, and 61% thought that it is time to legislate. Conclusion Legislation for brain death and organ transplantation is urgent and timely in China. The laws must include the respective rights and obligations of patients, close relatives, and medical institutions. Educating the public about brain death and organ transplantation should also be encouraged in a variety of ways.
Through analyzing the relevant regulations of organ transplantation in China, we identified the problems in the regulations of organ transplantation in China, including more strict limitation of the living organ donors resulting in a serious shortage of organ supply, difficulties in preventing the hidden organ trading, and opaque process of organ allocation resulting in unfair distribution. We also put forward the solutions to address above problems, including the improvement of organ transplantation regulations, establishment of the reimbursement mechanism for organ donation, rational mechanism of organ allocation and the brain death criteria, so as to promote more comprehensive sources of organ donation for the patients with end-stage organ failure.
Background and Objective Organ transplantation has become an essential and irreplaceable treatment for patients with organ failure. Although organ transplantation was introduced to China in the 1960s, it has witnessed rapid development in recent years. However, problems have been identified in the course of its development. We aim to present both medical and legal points of view on organ transplantation, to compare the current status of organ transplantation in China with that in developed countries, and discuss the challenges China faces in developing its own legislation for organ transplantation. Methods We searched the websites of WHO, NIH, AST, UNOS, and governments, as well as relevant conference proceedings and expert consensus documents. Articles or documents involving organ transplantation legislation were identified. Results We included 10 legal documents, 1 regulation, 9 government documents, and 4 expert consensus documents. Organ transplantation legislation started in the 1960s in the United Kingdom, and was soon followed by New Zealand and the United States. The first law on brain death was enacted in the United States in 1978. Since 1991, the World Health Assembly (WHA) and other non-governmental organizations have issued 7 consensus documents in order to regulate behaviors related to organ transplantation. China including Hong Kong, Macau and Chinese Taipei has not yet formulated any law on organ transplantation. Conclusion At least six challenges about organ transplantation and brain death legislation in China are identified: ① death definition and source of organ donors; ② prevention of organ transplant tourism; ③ risk assessment and insurance for living donors; ④ defining who has the right to choose about potential organ donation for an individual: whether spouses, parents, or children; ⑤ whether an organ donor should receive compensation; ⑥ whether brain death and organ transplant laws should be formulated separately.
Objective We investigated the effectiveness of legislation in developed countries by analyzingtheir legislation, and produced ideas and strategies for organ transplantation and brain death legislation in China.Methods Official websites were searched as follows: UNOS, TCE, CLTR, ANZDATA, and SRTR through December6, 2008. We included statistical reports and data analysis of organ donations and transplants, and excluded literatureabout non-solid organs. The absolute transplantation numbers were standardized to per one million people. Results 1.The following data was retrieved: The number of eight kinds of organ transplants and organ donations in Britain, the United States, New Zealand, Spain, France, Italy, Germany, and Australia from 2003 to 2005; the number of deceased donors in the United States and Spain from 1988 to 2007; the total number of organ transplants in Australia from 2002 to 2006; the amount of organ transplants in the United States from 1993 to 2006; liver and kidney transplant totals in the United States from 1988 through March, 2008; liver transplants number of China from 1993 through March, 2008; and the number of kidney transplants in some provinces and cities in China. 2. Transplant totals were greatest in the United States; in Spain, after ONT was founded in 1990, the rate of donation from the deceased was the most in theworld. 3. Spain had the best rate of donation with 34.5 pmp, 10.9 pmp higher than in the United States with separate legislation from 2003 to 2005. There was a rate difference of 0.98 pmp between Germany and the United Kingdomwhich implemented separated legislation nine years earlier. 4. Southern Australia had a maximum rate of average kidneytransplant in the country from 2002 to 2006. 5. Live donor kidney transplants accounted for 31.2~44% compared to4.3% and 4.1% for liver transplants in 2006 and 2007 respectively in the United States. 6. The following have been appliedglobally to regulate organ transplantation and brain death: 1) International or multilateral treaties; 2) Regulation ofNGOs; 3) Self-discipline in the field of organ transplantation; 4) Expert consensus; 5) Establishment of patient’s alliance.Conclusion Countries that have implemented organ transplantation and brain death laws have developed successfulmeasures to improve and support insurance and follow-up information for donors and recipients, however, legislation isstill urgently needed in China. As long as brain death and organ transplant laws are reasonably developed and legislatorsresolve to deal with the difficult issues, then the legislation and its subsequent enforcement will reflect the interests of the people and improve health quality for all.
As more and more issues have emerged in organ transplantion cases, there is an increasing dispute about the definition of death: whether the criteria of cardiopulmonary death or brain death should be applied. The conflict between rights and obligations in brain death and organ transplantion is becoming ever evident, and there is a need for clarity on the issue of death and organ transplantion. This needs to come through legislation, which would be the most economical and effective intervention to provide this clarity. The authors believe that the National People’s Congress of China (NPC), the Standing Committee of NPC, the State Council of China and the Supreme People’s Court of China may get involved in the legislation for issues related to brain death and organ transplantion. As for the selection of decrees related to brain death and organ transplantion, all provinces, autonomous regions and centrally-governed municipalities can not exercise corresponding local legislative power except for special economic zones. After brain death and organ transplant related laws, administrative regulations, local decrees, autonomous decrees and special decrees have been settled, relevant executive legislation may be enacted. During such a legislative procedure, pilot programs can be adopted so as to enhance the applicability and success rate of the legislation of brain death and organ transplant.
Objective To summarize the clinical experience of harvesting the lung of a brain death donor by international standardized methods, so as to establ ish a set of standards and regulations appl icable for harvesting the lung of brain-death donors in China. Methods The operation was performed on 1 brain-death donor who had endured 50 hours of mechanical ventilation. The donor was assessed by donor lung function test and international brain death standard. Then the organ was perfused and trimmed ready for lung transplantation. Results We succeeded in harvesting the heart, lung, liver, kidney and cornea from this brain-death voluntary donor. The harvested lung was successfully transplanted into a recipient. And the recipient recovered well after operation. Conclusion The successful experience of harvesting the lung of the brain-death voluntary donor will contribute to the development and promotion of the utilization of brain-death donor suppl ies.
Objective To investigate development and perspectives of brain death donation and transplantation. Methods The related literatures about the research of brain dead donors were reviewed. Results Brain death effects hemodynamic stability， hormonal changes， neuroimmunologic effects，and unleashes a cascade of inflammatory events， which may affect quality of graft， graft survival， and patient outcome. Moreover， the exact mechanism linked to brain death is incompletely understood. Conclusions The pathological physiology changes of brain dead donors has important impact on graft outcomes. However， subsequent work remains to be done.
Objective To explore the donor maintenance points of donor donation after brain death （DBD）. Methods From December 2011 to January 2012，two cases of organ DBD in our hospital were performed. After diagnosis of brain death，mechanical ventilation，fluid resuscitation，vasoactive drugs，inotropic drugs，and so on were used，and invasive arterial pressure， central venous pressure，heart rate，blood gas exchange，urine output，electrolyte and acid-base balance，body temperature， hematocrit，albumin level were monitored，the donors vital organ perfusion were successfully kept at acceptable level. Results The vital signs of two cases of DBD donors were stable. The livers，kidneys，and corneas were donated，and the functions were stable and normal. Case one was diagnosed for brain death 6h after ICU admitted，the period from diagnosis to organ procurement was 33h. Case two was diagnosed for brain death 8h after ICU admitted，the period from diagnosis to organ procurement was 31h. All transplanted organs，livers，kidneys，and corneas，were working well after operation. Conclusions Donor maintenance process of DBD is the cornerstone to ensuring successfully organ donation and transplantation，which is important to improve the utilization rate of donated organs，and release the severely shortage of organ.