ObjectiveTo explore the influence of norepinephrine on the prediction of fluid responsiveness by passive leg raising (PLR) during septic shock. MethodsForty-six septic shock patients in intensive care unit of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital were prospectively observed from September to November 2012. Among which 36 septic shock patients were enrolled with a positive PLR test (defined by an increase in stroke volume index ≥10%). A PLR test was performed at baseline (PLR1). A second PLR test (PLR2) was performed at returning to supine position for 10 min and the dose of norepinephrine was increased to maintain MAP ≥65 mmHg for 20 min. The changes of heart rate(HR),mean arterial pressure(MAP),central venous pressure(CVP),cardiac index(CI),stroke volume index(SVI),index of systemic vascular resistance(SVRI),global end-diastolic volume index(GEDVI),and cardiac function index(CFI) were monitored by transpulmonary thermodilution technique (PiCCO). ResultsPLR1 significantly increased SVI by (20.54±9.63)%,CI by (20.57±9.89)%,MAP by (7.64±5.77)%,and CVP by (25.83±23.39)%. As the dose of norepinephrine increased,SVI was increased by (16.97±9.06)%,CI by (16.78±8.39)%,GEDVI by (9.08±4.47)%,MAP by (28.07±12.48)%,and CVP by (7.86±8.52)%. PLR2 increased SVI by (13.74±8.79)%,CI by (13.79±9.08)%,MAP by (2.93±5.06)%,and CVP by (13.36±14.74)%. The PLR2 and the dose increase of norepinephrine augmented SVI to a significantly lesser extent than the PLR1 performed at baseline (both P<0.05). However,SVI increased by <10% in 6 patients while the baseline PLR was positive in these patients. ConclusionIn septic patients with a positive PLR at baseline,norepinephrine increases cardiac preload and cardiac output and influences the fluid responsiveness.
【摘要】 目的 探讨脓毒性休克早期液体复苏的临床反应性。 方法 对2008年2月—2010年2月38例采用早期目标定向治疗方案治疗的脓毒性休克患者按是否存活进行分组，就中心静脉压、心率、平均动脉压、输液量、尿量、血乳酸等指标进行评价。 结果 38例采用早期目标定向治疗方案治疗6 h均达标，存活21例（55.26%），死亡17例（44.74%），两组患者输液总量及输液种类差异无统计学意义（Pgt;0.05），存活组6、24 h尿量及血乳酸清除率明显优于死亡组（Plt;0.05）。 结论 血乳酸清除率及尿量可作为脓毒性休克液体复苏有效的临床监测指标。【Abstract】 Objective To study the clinical response to early fluid resuscitation therapy in septic shock patients. Methods Thirty-eight septic shock patients received early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) in the ICU of our hospital from February 2008 to February 2010. The patients were divided into survival group (n=21) and dead group (n=17). Indexes like central venous pressure (CVP), heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), fluid input, urine output, and blood lactate were evaluated. Results Six hours after the EGDT, the results for the patients were all up to standard. There were 21 cases of survival (55.26%) and 17 cases of death (44.74%). The total fluid input and liquid types were similar in the two groups (Pgt;0.05). The urine output and lactate clearance at hour 6 and 24 for the survival group were better than that for the dead group (Plt;0.05). Conclusion The lactate clearance and urine output can be regarded as an surveillance indicator of fluid resuscitation for patients with septic shock.
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical value of quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score in predicting the outcome of patients with septic shock. MethodsWe collected the clinical data of 170 patients with septic shock treated in the Emergency Intensive Care Unit between January 2013 and January 2014. According to the 28-day outcomes of the patients, they were recorded as survival group and non-survival group. We calculated the qSOFA score, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE)Ⅱ score on patients' admission. Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, we analyzed the qSOFA score, the effect of APACHE Ⅱ score in predicting the 28-day prognosis for patients with septic shock. The correlation between qSOFA score and APACHEⅡ score was also assessed. ResultsThe qSOFA and APACHEⅡ scores in non-survivors were higher than those in the survivors. According to ROC curve analysis, the area under the curve for qSOFA score and APACHE Ⅱ score was 0.666 and 0.791, respectively. For qSOFA score with 2 cut-off points to evaluate the prognosis of septic shock, the sensitivity was 62.7%, specificity was 61.1%, positive predictive value was 56.0%, negative predictive value was 67.4%, positive likelihood ratio was 1.61, and negative likelihood ratio was 0.61. For the APACHEⅡ score with 24 cut-off points to evaluate the prognosis of septic shock, the sensitivity was 70.7%, specificity was 80%, positive predictive value was 73.6%, negative predictive value was 67.3%, positive likelihood ratio was 3.54, and negative likelihood ratio was 0.37. The correlation coefficient of qSOFA score and APACHE Ⅱ score was 0.499. ConclusionThe qSOFA score is useful to evaluate the prognosis of the patients with septic shock early in Emergency Department.
Objective To investigate the value of central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference/arterial-to-venous oxygen difference ratio [P(cv-a)CO2/C(a-cv)O2] in predicting oxygen metabolism after fluid resuscitation in patients with septic shock. Methods A prospective observational study was carried out on septic shock patients admitted in the intensive care unit of Nanjng Drum Tower Hospital from November 2013 to April 2014. All patients underwent fluid challenge (300 ml saline for 20 min, rapid intravenous infusion). The patients were divided into a fluid responded group (ΔCI≥10%) and a fluid unresponded group (ΔCI＜10%), according to the change of cardiac output index (ΔCI) after fluid challenge. Then the patients were divided into two subgroups in the fluid responded group, namely a ΔVO2≥10% group and a ΔVO2＜10% group, according to the change of VO2 (ΔVO2). Cardiac output index (CI) were determined by pulse indicator continuous cardiac output (PICCO). Hemoglobin, arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO2), arterial oxygen (PaO2), arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2), arterial blood lactate, central venous carbon dioxide (PcvCO2), central venous oxygen (PcvO2) and central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) were measured by blood gas analysis. P(cv-a)CO2/C(a-cv)O2 and oxygen consumption (VO2) were calculated. P(cv-a)CO2/C(a-cv)O2 before and after fluid challenge was compared between two subgroups. Results Fluid challenges were performed in 23 instances in 18 patients, among which 17 instances were defined as the fluid responded group. Compared with the fluid unresponded group, P(cv-a)CO2/C(a-cv)O2, arterial lactate and ScvO2 had no significant difference [P(cv-a)CO2/C(a-cv)O2](mm Hg/ml): 2.05±0.75vs. 1.58±0.67; arterial lactate (mmol/l): 3.78±2.50vs. 3.26±2.42; ScvO2(%): 73.71±9.64vs. 70.30±12.01,P＞0.05] in the fluid responded group before resuscitation. In the fluid responded group, there were 10 instances in the ΔVO2≥10% group and 7 instances in the ΔVO2＜10% group. P(cv-a)CO2/C(a-cv)O2 (mm Hg/ml) was significantly higher in the ΔVO2≥10% group before resuscitation compared with the ΔVO2＜10% group (2.43±0.73vs. 1.51±0.37,P＜0.01). Lactate (mmol/l) was also higher in the ΔVO2≥10% group before resuscitation (4.53±2.52vs. 1.46±0.82,P＜0.01). ScvO2 (%) had no significant difference between two groups (70.79±9.15vs. 72.13±13.42,P＞0.05). The areas under ROC curve (AUCs) of P(cv-a)CO2/C(a-cv)O2, lactate and ScvO2 for predicting ΔVO2≥10% were 0.843, 0.921, and 0.529, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of P(cv-a)CO2/C(a-cv)O2≥1.885 mm Hg/ml for predicting ΔVO2≥10% after fluid resuscitation were 70% and 86%, respectively. Conclusion For septic shock patients with fluid responsiveness, P(cv-a)CO2/C(a-cv)O2 can predict oxygen metabolism after fluid resuscitation and can be used as a reliable parameter to guide fluid resuscitation.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of pulse indicating continuous cardiac output (PICCO) monitoring for guiding the treatment of patients with septic shock.MethodsDatabases including PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, Web of Science, CBM, WanFang Data, VIP and CNKI were electronically searched from inception to February 2017 to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about PICCO monitoring on treatment guidance of patients with septic shock. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed using Stata 12.0 software.ResultsA total of 20 RCTs involving 1 253 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed: compared with central venous pressure (CVP) measurements, the treatment of sepsis bundles informed by PICCO could significantly shorten the length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay (MD=–2.74, 95%CI –3.40 to –2.09, P<0.001), reduce the ICU mortality (RR=0.49, 95%CI 0.36 to 0.67, P<0.001) and 28-day mortality (RR=0.61, 95%CI 0.43 to 0.87, P=0.006).ConclusionCurrent evidence shows the PICCO monitoring can significantly improve the prognosis of septic shock. Due to limited and quantity quality of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify above conclusion.
Objective To evaluate the effect of hemoperfusion for absorption of inflammatory cytokines on sepsis . Method A prospective randomized controlled study was carried out to collect 60 sepsis patients admitted to the Department of Critical Care Medicine of this hospital from June 2019 to December 2021. They were randomly divided into a study group (30 cases) and a control group (30 cases) by using the random number table method. Both groups of patients received routine treatment according to the guidelines, including fluid resuscitation, mechanical ventilation, antibiotic and vasoactive agents. For the patients with renal failure, renal replacement therapy (RRT) was used. Routine vital sign monitoring and serum procalcitonin (PCT) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) determination were recorded. The study group received two times of hemoperfusion to absorb inflammatory cytokines at 0 h and 24 h after enrollment. At 24 h and 48 h after treatment, the vital signs and related physical and chemical indexes of patients were recorded again, including norepinephrine dose, oxygenation index, PCT, IL-6 and blood lactic acid. The changes of physical and chemical indexes and the 28-day survival rate of the two groups were compared. Results There was no difference in the general situation of the two groups when they were enrolled (P>0.05). The dosage of norepinephrine [(0.77±0.48)μg·kg–1·min–1 vs. (0.92±0.62) μg·kg–1·min–1, P=0.030] and the level of blood lactic acid [(2.70±1.43)mmol/L vs. (4.05±2.60)mmol/L, P=0.001] in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group 24 h and 48 h after treatment. The oxygenation index in the study group was higher than that of the control group 24 h after treatment (212±68)mm Hg vs. (197±42)mm Hg, P=0.042). The inflammation related indexes PCT [(17±24)ng/mL vs. (32±36)ng/mL, P=0.013] and IL-6 [299 (102, 853)pg/mL vs. 937 (247, 2230)pg/mL, P=0.026] in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group 48 h after treatment. The dosage of noradrenaline, oxygenation index, PCT, IL-6 and blood lactate level in the study group after treatment were improved compared with those before treatment (P<0.05), while those in the control group were not significantly improved after treatment (P>0.05), and oxygenation index in the two groups had no significant difference before and after treatment (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the 28-day survival rate between the two groups (χ2=0.211, P=0.646). Conclusion Although the hemoperfusion for absorption of inflammatory cytokine factors can not reduce the 28-day mortality of sepsis, it can significantly improve the early physical and chemical indicators of patients, and provide opportunities for follow-up treatment.