Objective To evaluate the cl inical effect and the pathological characteristics of acellular allogeneic dermal matrix in repairing unstable burn scar. Methods From January 2007 to June 2008, 19 cases of unstable burn scars (24 parts) were treated, including 16 males (20 parts) and 3 females (4 parts) with a median age of 27 years (range, 3-58 years). Theinjury was caused by flame (14 cases, 18 parts), electricity (4 cases, 5 parts), and hot water (1 case, 1 part). The unstable burn scars located on hands (8 cases), forearms (2 cases), thighs (3 cases), legs (2 cases), feet (2 cases), chest (1 case), and abdomen (1 case). Scar formed for 3 months to 1 year. The area of defect varied from 7 cm × 5 cm to 22 cm × 15 cm after scar removal. Defects were covered with acellular allogeneic dermal matrix and autogenous spl it-thickness skin graft. At 6-18 months after operation, the pathological observations of the epidermis, the basal membrane, and structural components of the dermis were done. Results All wounds healed by first intention. Scar ulcer disappeared completely in 18 cases and the composite skin grafts all survived. Some bl isters occurred in 1 case and were cured after dressing changing. All patients were followed up 10 months to 2 years (18 months on average). The grafted-skin was excellent in the appearance, texture, and elasticity. The function recovered well. Only superficial scar was observed at skin donor sites. Pathological observation showed that the epidermis and the basal membrane of the skin grafts were similar to that of normal skin, and no significant difference was found in newly capillaries between them. Collagen fibers arranged regularly, and there were few inflammatory cells in the matrix. Conclusion Acellular allogeneic dermal matrix with autogenous spl it-thickness skin graft may effectivly repair the wound after removing the unstable burn scar, and its structure is similar to that of normal skin.
OBJECTIVE: To observe the clinical effect of acellular allogenic dermis with split-thickness autogenous skin graft for coverage of wound. METHODS: Acellular allogenic dermis with split-thickness autogenous skin graft was used to repair 34 wounds of head, neck, trunk and extremities. The area of wounds was from 5 cm x 10 cm to 12 cm x 19 cm. Out of 34 wounds, there were 2 due to old granulation, 4 due to excision of giant pigmented nevus, 6 due to excision of capillary hemangioma of skin and 22 due to excision of scar. RESULTS: All grafts survived and had the smooth surface without obvious pigmentation and with slight wound contraction. CONCLUSION: Acellular allogenic dermis with autologous epithelium for coverage of various wounds is an ideal procedure.
ObjectiveTo investigate the feasibil ity and effectiveness of using scar spl it thickness skin grafts combined with acellular allogeneic dermis in the treatment of large deep Ⅱ degree burn scar. MethodsBetween January 2013 and December 2013, 20 cases of large deep Ⅱ degree burn scar undergoing plastic operation were enrolled. There were 14 males and 6 females, aged 4 to 60 years (mean, 40 years). Burn reasons included hydrothermal burns in 10 cases, flame burns in 9 cases, and lime burns in 1 case. The burn area accounted for 70% to 96% total body surface area (TBSA) with an average of 79% TBSA. The time from wound healing to scar repair was 3 months to 2 years (mean, 7 months). Based on self-control, 0.7 mm scar spl it thickness skin graft was used to repair the wound at the right side of joints after scar resection (control group, n=35), 0.5 mm scar spl it thickness skin graft combined with acellular allogeneic dermis at the left side of joints (trial group, n=30). Difference was not statistically significant in the scar sites between 2 groups (Z=-1.152, P=0.249). After grafting, negative pressure drainage was given for 10 days; plaster was used for immobilization till wound heal ing; and all patients underwent regular rehabil itation exercises. ResultsNo significant difference was found in wound heal ing, infection, and healing time between 2 groups (P>0.05). All patients were followed up for 6 months. According to the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), the score was 5.23±1.41 in trial group and was 10.17±2.26 in control group, showing significant difference (t=8.925, P=0.000). Referring to Activities of Daily Living (ADL) grading standards to assess joint function, the results were excellent in 8 cases, good in 20 cases, fair in 1 case, and poor in 1 case in trial group; the results were excellent in 3 cases, good in 5 cases, fair in 22 cases, and poor in 5 cases in control group; and difference was statistically significant (Z=-4.894, P=0.000). ConclusionA combination of scar spl it thickness skin graft and acellular allogeneic dermis in the treatment of large deep Ⅱ degree burn scar is feasible and can become one of solution to the problem of skin source tension.
Objective To evaluate the application effect of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in immediate breast reconstruction after mammary mastectomy with prosthetic implants. Methods The clinical data of 68 patients with breast cancer undergoing immediate breast reconstruction with prosthetic implantation in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed and divided into ADM group (n=43) and non-ADM group (n=25), according to the use of ADM in the posterior space of pectoralis major muscle while prosthesis implantation or not. The size of breast prosthesis, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, drainage duration, total drainage, total hospital stay, postoperative complications, postoperative cosmetic effect and quality of life of patients were compared between the two groups. Results Patients in the ADM group showed no statistically significant difference regarding operative time, drainage duration, total drainage, hospital stay, postoperative complications and intraoperative removed gland volume with the non-ADM group (P>0.05). The average intraoperative blood loss in the ADM group was less than that of the non-ADM group, the average volume of prosthesis in the ADM group was bigger than that of the non-ADM group, the volume difference between prosthesis and removed gland in the ADM group was smaller than that of the non-ADM group, which was considered statistically significant difference (P<0.05). The subjective satisfaction and objective measurement scores of patients in the ADM group were significantly better than those of the non-ADM group, especially in the symmetry of breast, surgical scar and distance of lateral displacement of nipple (P<0.05). The postoperative quality of life in the ADM group was significantly better than that of the non-ADM group in terms of body image, sexual function and sexual interest (P<0.01). Conclusions It is safe and feasible to use ADM-assisted the immediate breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mammary mastectomy with prosthetic implantation. As an extension of the pectoralis major muscle, ADM can enlarge the posterior space for the prosthesis implantation, making the choice of the prosthesis much more easier. The combined application of ADM can obtain a better cosmetic effect, meanwhile improving the postoperative quality of life and satisfaction of patients.