目的 探讨胰十二指肠切除术后胰瘘引起腹腔大出血行外科治疗的可行性。方法 在343例行胰十二指肠切除术的患者中，2例术后发生严重的胰瘘伴有腹腔大出血，均再次手术行胰肠分离式桥式内引流术。结果 经术后支持治疗、持续腹腔冲洗、抑制胰酶分泌，治疗成功，顺利出院。术后随访18个月，没有胰管梗阻和脱落的迹象。患者没有发生糖尿病。结论 胰十二指肠切除术后胰瘘导致的腹腔大出血治疗非常困难，通过外科再手术行胰肠分离式桥式内引流术，取得成功，避免了复杂的全胰切除，挽救了胰腺功能，提高了患者的成功救治机会，改善了患者术后的生活质量。
Objective To summarize the risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment experience of intra-abdominal bleeding following surgeries for severe acute pancreatitis. Methods A retrospective review was conducted of 347 patients underwent necrosectomy for severe acute pancreatitis between January 2011 and December 2015 at West China Hospital of Sichuan University. Results Of the 347 patients, thirty-eight patients had intra-abdominal bleeding after surgeries, including 5 patients who had twice bleeding. The bleeding positions including splenic vein (n=7), splenic artery (n=2), pancreatic and peripancreatic vessels (n=8), colonic mesangial vessels (n=6), other vessels (n=12), and extensive osmotic bleeding in abdominal cavity (n=7). Hemostatic modes: suture (n=20), compression hemostasis (n=18), transcatheteranerial embolism (n=2), suture and compression hemostasis (n=4), and conservative treatment (n=1). There were 19 dead patients of 38 bleeding patients. There were statistically significant differences between the hemorrhage group and the non-hemorrhage group on gender, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHEⅡ) scores and modified Marshall scores at admission, interval onset to surgery, surgical approaches, and morbidity (P<0.05). Compared with the non-hemorrhage group, there were more males, higher APACHE Ⅱ scores and modified Marshall scores, longer interval onset to surgery, and higher mortality in the hemorrhage group. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that male patients had higher risk of intra-abdominal bleeding (OR=3.980, P=0.004), as the grow of APACHEⅡ scores, the risk of intra-abdominal bleeding increased (OR=1.487, P<0.001). Conclusions We should pay more attention on the male SAP patients as well as patients with multiple organ dysfunction.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of unconventional abdominal drainage after laparoscopic hepatectomy.MethodsThe clinicopathologic data of patients who underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy for liver tumors in the Mianyang Central Hospital from June to December 2019 and met the inclusion criteria were retrospectively collected. Based on whether drainage tube was placed in the abdominal cavity during operation, the patients were divided into non-catheterized group (without drainage tube) and catheterized group (with drainage tube). The intraoperative data and postoperative complications (e.g. intraabdominal hemorrhage, bile leakage, abdominal infection, and liver failure) were compared between the two groups. Then, the intraoperative data and postoperative conditions of liver cancer and non-liver cancer patients with or without abdominal drainage tube were compared and analyzed.ResultsA total of 117 eligible patients were included in the study. The non-catheterized group had 59 patients and the catheterized group had 58 patients. The patients with liver cancer had 84 patients (44 non-catheterized patients and 40 catheterized patients) and the patients without liver cancer had 33 patients (15 non-catheterized patients and 18 catheterized patients). ① On the whole, the groups were comparable in the baseline data between the non-catheterized group and the catheterized group, such as gender, age, HBV infection, body mass index, hepatic function index, liver stiffness value, disease category, etc. (P>0.05). Compared with the catheterized group, the non-catheterized group had earlier off-bed activities and earlier flatus time (P<0.001), and shorter postoperative hospital stay (P=0.030). However, no statistically significant differences were found in other indicators between the two groups (P>0.05). ② Whether the patients had liver cancer or not, the non-catheterized patients still had earlier off-bed activities and earlier flatus time as compared with the catheterized patients (P<0.001). Among the patients with liver cancer, no difference was found in postoperative hospital stay. However, among the patients without liver cancer, the non-catheterized patients had shorter postoperative hospital stay than the catheterized patients (P=0.042). No statistically significant differences were found in other indicators between the catheterized patients and non-catheterized patients (P>0.05).ConclusionFor technologically skilled laparoscopic hepatectomy center, selectively not placing peritoneal drainage tube after surgery might better promote the health of patients.