【摘要】 目的 探讨肝炎后肝硬化自发性细菌性腹膜炎（spontaneous bacterial peritonitis，SBP）的诊疗情况及头孢哌酮舒巴坦联合左旋氧氟沙星对SBP的治疗效果。 方法 对2004年1月-2009年12月收治的54例肝炎后肝硬化SBP患者，应用头孢哌酮舒巴坦联合左旋氧氟沙星给与治疗，并观察分析治疗效果。 结果 肝炎后肝硬化SBP的临床表现以发热，腹痛为主，具有典型腹膜刺激征的不足半数。外周血白细胞升高者不多见，腹腔积液中白细胞计数、PMN计数和细菌培养是自发性细菌性腹膜炎的重要诊断指标。 结论 肝炎后肝硬化合并SBP的临床表现不典型。致病菌以G-杆菌为主。在早期诊断、综合治疗的基础上，头孢哌酮舒巴坦联合左旋氧氟沙星对自发性细菌性腹膜炎的治疗效果显著。【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate the diagnosis and treatment of post-hepatitis cirrhosis complicated with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) cases and the efficacy of cefoperazone and sulbactam combined with levofloxacin in the treatment of cirrhotic patients with SBP. Methods From January 2004 to December 2009, the clinical data from 54 cases of SBP after cirrhosis were analyzed. The patients underwent the treatment of cefoperazone sulbactam combined with levofloxacin. The therapeutic effect was observed. Results The main clinical manifestations were fever and abdominal pain, and about half of the patients had the typical peritoneal irritation. Only a few patients had elevated peripheral white blood cells (WBC). The WBC count, abdominal effusion polymorphonuclearcyte count and bacteria cultivation were the indexes of diagnosis of SBP. Conclusion The clinical features of post-hepatitis cirrhosis complicated with SBP are not typical. The main pathogenic bacteria is G- bacilli. In the early diagnosis and treatment, cefoperazone sulbactam combined with levofloxacin is effective.
Objective To investigate predictive value of procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) in patients with liver cirrhosis ascites. Methods The clinical data of 140 patients with liver cirrhosis ascites treated in our hospital from January 2012 to January 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the presence of SBP, these patients were divided into SBP group and non-SBP group. The clinical data were compared between these two groups. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed to assess their sensitivities and specificities of PCT and CRP for diagnosis of SBP. Results The PCT and CRP levels of the SBP group were significantly higher than those of the non-SBP group (P<0.05). The differences of serum ALT, AST and white cell count between the SBP group and the non-SBP were not statistically significant (P>0.05). The ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the ROC curve of PCT and CRP were 0.895 and 0.926, their corresponding cut-off value 2.1 μg/L and 24.8 mg/L, the sensitivities were 86.9% and 89.5%, the specificities were 85.1% and 83.5%, respectively. Conclusion Abnormally elevated PCT and CRP levels might have an important detective value for SBP in patients with liver cirrhosis ascites.