west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "自尊" 3 results
  • ICU护士不良情绪相关因素分析

    目的 了解ICU护士的焦虑和抑郁、自尊状况,以便采取有效措施和方式减轻压力,使护士保持身心健康,从而提高ICU患者的抢救成功率和护理质量。 方法 2010年8月采用抑郁自评量表(SDS)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)和自尊量表(SES),对88名ICU护士进行问卷调查。 结果 不同因素对SAS、SDS、SES分值的影响为:女护士高于男护士;学历高的高于学历较低的;工龄长的高于工龄短的;年龄大的高于年龄小的。性别、年龄、工龄、受教育的程度对焦虑和抑郁、自尊的影响均有差异。 结论  ICU护士的SDS、SAS的分值较高,特别女性护士更为严重,在临床护理管理当中应给于更多的关注。

    Release date:2016-09-08 09:13 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 社区精神康复对精神分裂症患者自尊的影响

    目的针对康复期精神分裂症患者进行社区康复训练,探讨社区精神康复对精神分裂症患者自尊的影响。 方法选取2011年3月-9月在四川大学华西医院心理卫生中心住院治疗且达到临床痊愈后出院的精神分裂症患者为研究对象。对照组患者仅进行门诊随访治疗;干预组患者在门诊随访治疗的基础上同时参加由精神科护士和心理咨询师进行的每周1次的社区康复训练课程。再将干预组患者分为5个小组,每个小组11~12例,每天参加1种康复训练,训练时间为1.5~2.0 h。采用自尊量表(SES)对两组患者康复训练前(SES1)、康复训练后3个月(SES2)、康复训练后6个月(SES3)进行评定。 结果将符合入选标准的101例患者随机分为对照组(45例)和干预组(56例)。分别于康复训练前、康复训练后3、6个月发放101份SES,均有效收回,有效回收率为100%。干预组SES1评分[(23.96±2.05)分]与对照组[(23.80±2.61)分]比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);干预组SES2、SES3评分[(28.48±2.69)、(33.59±2.33)分]与对照组[(22.29±4.17)、(22.07±4.11)分]比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 结论社区精神康复训练对提高精神分裂症患者自尊水平有积极意义,可以消除患者的病耻感,预防疾病复发,促使精神患者的心理健康,提高患者的生活质量,使其在社会中找到存在的个人价值感和归宿感。

    Release date:2016-12-27 11:09 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Current status of stigma of disease in patients with epilepsy and its influencing factors

    ObjectiveTo analyze the current the sense of shame and its influencing factors in patients with epilepsy. Methods The research subjects selected information from 103 epilepsy patients who were hospitalized at the Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023. The self-made General Information Questionnaire, social impact scale (SIS), social avoidance and distress scale, self-concealment scale and self-esteem scale were used to collect information. Pearson method was used to analyze the correlation between the score of SIS and the scores of social avoidance and distress scale, self-concealment scale and self-esteem scale Multiple linear regression model was used to analyze the factors affecting SIS score.Statistically, P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results The score of SIS was (58.40±12.649) .According to statistical analysis of Pearson’s results, the SIS score of patients with epilepsy was found to be positively correlated with the scores in the three tables above (all P<0.05). Multiple Regression analysis analysis showed that family income, social avoidance and distress scale, self-concealment scale and self-esteem scale were the influential factors of SIS score in epilepsy patients (all P<0.05). ConclusionClinical workers should pay close attention to the psychological changes of patients with epilepsy and do a good job in psychological nursing, so as to improve the quality of life of patients.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content