ObjectiveTo explore the effect of self-made urine volume record sheet and health education on urine volume monitoring in general ward. MethodsA total of 110 hospitalized patients between February and July 2015 were selected to be our study subjects. The patients were divided into control group (n=42) and trial group (n=68) according to the time period. The control group used conventional urine volume record and accepted common health education, while the trial group received a self-made urine volume 24-hour record sheet with health knowledge and accepted special health education about urine volume by nurses. Then, we investigated the two groups with a questionnaire about urine volume, and analyzed the acquired data and compared the knowledge of the two groups. ResultsThe knowledge of urine volume and the performance of urine volume record in the trial group were significantly better than the control group (P<0.05). In the control group, the difference in knowledge of aim and singnificance of urine record between the two genders was sigrificant (P<0.05). (the males were better than the females); and was also significant among patients with different educational levels (P<0.05). (the people with college or superior degree was the best, while the ones with primary school education or inferior level was the poorest). ConclusionUsing the self-made urine volume record sheet with health knowledge and strengthening the special health education about urine volume can improve the knowledge awareness of the patients and their families, promote the monitoring of patients’ urine, train patients’ self-care awareness, and improve patients’ prognosis.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of health education pathway intervention on self-care agency and health lifestyle promotion in colostomy patients. MethodsEighty-eight rectal cancer patients who had undergone colostomy were randomly divided into control group and intervention group (with 44 patients in each) between March 2012 and September 2013. The control group received conventional nursing only, while the intervention group were given health education pathway intervention besides conventional nursing. The self-care agency and health lifestyle promotion in the two groups under pre-colostomy state, one week after colostomy and two weeks after colostomy were surveyed and compared based on the exercise of self-care agency scale and the health promotion lifestyle profile. ResultsAfter health education pathway intervention, the scores of self-care agency and health lifestyle promotion in the intervention group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P<0.05), and the hospitalization expenditure was also obviously lower. Furthermore, the satisfaction degree on nursing service was significantly higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). ConclusionThe health education pathway intervention can greatly improve self-care agency and quality of life in rectal cancer patients who have undergone colostomy.
ObjectiveTo analyze the impact of social resources on self-management in patients undergoing coronary stent implantation, and provide evidence for nurses to predict patients' self-management behavior and take intervening measures. MethodsA convenience sample of 359 patients undergoing coronary stent implantation between July and December 2013 was selected according to the criteria. Three instruments were used to collect data including general data scale, chronic illness resources survey (CIRS) and coronary artery disease self-management scale (CSMS). ResultsThe score of CIRS among 359 patients was 2.77±0.60, and the scores of six subscales in descending order were support of neighborhood/community, media and policy, and family and friends, and personal coping, and support of physician/health care team, and organizations. The total score of CSMS was 55.58±10.59, and the scores of three subscales in descending order were:daily management, emotion management, and medical management. The total self-management score and factor scores of CIRS were significantly correlated with the total and factor scores of CSMS (r=0.183-0.663, P<0.05), while the correlation of support of physician/health care team and family and friends with daily life management was negative (r=-0.215, -0.294; P<0.05). ConclusionIn this study, patients' total social resources are at a low level; the standard of self-management is at a moderate level, while medical management has the lowest score; good social resources can promote self-management, but supports from medical staff, family and friends are bad for patients' daily life management.
Objective To investigate the influence of self-care and self-efficacy intervention on the quality of life of patients undergoing chemotherapy after surgery for gastric cancer. Methods Sixty-four patients undergoing chemotherapy after gastric cancer surgery between July 2014 and February 2015 were selected as the study subjects. According the sequence of admission, they were divided into intervention group (n=34) and control group (n=30). Patients in the control group accepted conventional care, while those in the intervention group received self-efficacy and self-care interventions. The scores of General Self-efficacy Scale (GCES), Exercise of Self-care Agency (ESCA), and Quality of Life Instruments for Cancer Patients-Stomach Cancer (QLICP-ST) were compared between the two groups before and after intervention. Results After intervention, GCES scores of the intervention group and the control group were respectively (30.08±4.21) and (20.78±4.58) points; the total scores of ESCA were respectively (132.30±14.81) and (92.45±13.23) points; and the total scores of QLICP-ST were respectively (75.96±9.41) and (56.77±10.32) points. All the above differences between the two groups were significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Self-care and self-efficacy intervention can improve self-care ability and self-efficacy, and improve the quality of life of patients undergoing chemotherapy after gastric cancer surgery.
Objective To observe the effectiveness of IMPACT management mode on self-care and management abilities of breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy with implantable venous access port (VAP). Methods Breast cancer patients who underwent chemotherapy with VAP at Shangjin Hospital, West China Hospital, Sichuan University between March 2020 and June 2021 were prospectively included. IMPACT mode was used for self-management training guidance. The patient self-care abilities before training and at 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months of training were compared, and the patient self-management abilities at 1 month and 3 months of training were compared. Results A total of 74 patients with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy with VAP were included. The total score of self-care ability of patients before training and at 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months of training was 112.11±14.63, 123.20±15.73, 127.95±13.89, and 131.92±13.60, respectively, and all the between-time-point differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). In terms of self-concept score, all the between-time-point differences were statistically significant (P<0.05) with increasing score over time, except the difference between the score at 3 months of training and that at 2 months of training (P>0.05). In terms of self-responsibility and self-care skill scores, all the between-time-point differences were statistically significant (P<0.05) with increasing scores over time, except the difference between the score at 2 months of training and that at 1 month of training (P>0.05). In terms of health knowledge level, the scores at 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months of training were higher than that before training (P<0.05), and the score at 3 months of training was higher than that at 1 month of training (P<0.05). The self-management ability scores in all dimensions at 3 months of training were higher than those at 1 month of training, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion The IMPACT management mode can effectively improve the self-care and management abilities of breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy with VAP, thereby ensuring the normal use of VAP, reducing the occurrence of complications, and reducing the burden on families and society.
ObjectiveThis article aims to comprehensively retrieve and summarize the best evidence for the self-management of epilepsy in adolescents, so as to provide a reference for clinical medical staff and relevant decision makers. MethodsWe systematically searched Cochrane, Global Guidelines Collaboration (GIN), Scottish Interhospital Guidelines Network (SIGN), Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI), NICE, RANO (Nurses' Association of Ontario, Canada), UpToDate, BMJ, Medical Maitong, PubMed, International League Against Epilepsy, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database and other databases and websites. All kinds of literature related to the self-management of epilepsy in adolescents were collected from the establishment of the database to April 18, 2023, including clinical decision-making, clinical guidelines,. Evidence summary, expert consensus, systematic review, etc. Four researchers were invited to evaluate the quality of the retrieved guidelines, and two researchers independently screened and evaluated the quality of the remaining literature. According to the opinions of professionals, data extraction and analysis were performed on the literature that met the inclusion criteria. ResultsA total of 9 articles were included, including 3 clinical guidelines, 3 expert consensus and 3 systematic reviews. We summarized the evidence in the literature in the following 8 aspects: Self-management initiation timing, monitoring management, psychological management, innovative self-management mode, information and support, medication management, daily life management and follow-up management. We identified 34 best pieces of evidence. ConclusionsThis article provides health care providers with the best evidence for the self-management of adolescents with epilepsy, guiding them to provide self-management education and counseling for adolescents with epilepsy through evidence-based methods, helping them to improve self-management ability, reduce seizures, reduce health services and healthcare costs, and improve quality of life.