Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of aromatase inhibitors in ovulation induction for women with unexplained infertility. Methods The databases such as CNKI (1994 to June 2011), WanFang Data (1982 to June 2011), PubMed (1966 to June 2011) and The Cochrane Library (Issue 6, 2011) were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomized controlled trials (quasi-RCTs) for the comparison between aromatase inhibitors (AIs) and clomiphene citrate (CC). The quality of the retrieved trials was critically appraised and meta-analyses were conducted using RevMan 5.0.1 software. Results Nine studies were included; all of them were published in English. The results of meta-analyses showed there were no significant differences between AIs and CC in the pregnancy rate (RR=1.02, 95%CI 0.71 to 1.47), miscarriage rate (RR=1.00 95%CI 0.61 to 1.63), multiple pregnancy rate (RD= –0.02, 95%CI –0.07 to 0.03), and incidence rate of adverse events (RD=0.00, 95%CI –0.01 to 0.01); there were still no significant differences between the AIs+gonadotropin (Gn) group and the CC+Gn group in the pregnancy rate (RR=0.98, 95%CI 0.68 to 1.42), miscarriage rate (RR=1.23, 95%CI 0.70 to 2.15), multiple pregnancy rate (RD=0.00, 95%CI –0.10 to 0.10), and incidence rate of adverse events (RD=0.00, 95%CI –0.10 to 0.01). Conclusion Whether aromatase inhibitors can replace clomiphene citrate in ovulation induction for women with unexplained infertility is still an issue that has to be identified by performing well-designed large scale RCTs with longer follow-up duration.
【摘要】 目的 探讨老年性乳腺癌术前内分泌治疗效果及降期后手术优点。 方法 2004年5月－2010年12月19例老年性局部晚期乳腺癌患者，术前给予口服芳香化酶抑制剂（aromatase inhibitors，AI）2～10个月，进行疗效观察，降期后手术及术后同一有效内分泌药物继续治疗并随访，时间1～66个月。 结果 自AI治疗开始至手术时，临床完全缓解2例，部分缓解11例，稳定3例，进展3例；手术14例，另5例由于全身状况差、基础疾病严重不能耐受手术或局部进展而放弃手术，5年总生存率68%，无瘤生存率47%。 结论 术前内分泌治疗疗效可靠，不良反应轻，特别适应老年伴有内科疾病不适应化学疗法的患者，可以增加保乳手术率和手术切除率。【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the clinical value of neo-adjuvant endocrine therapy for locally advanced breast cancer in elderly patients and the advantages of operation after down-staging of breast cancer. Methods From May 2004 to December 2010, 19 patients with locally advanced breast cancer were treated with Aromatase inhibitor (AI) neo-adjuvant endocrine therapy for 2 to 10 months before operation. The clinical efficacy was observed. Operation was performed after down-staging of the cancer. After the operation, patients continued taking the same effective drug and were followed-up for 1 to 66 months. Results From AI treatment to the time of operation, there were 2 cases of clinical complete response, 11 cases of clinical partial response, 3 cases of stable disease, and 3 cases of progressive disease. A total of 14 patients were operated, and 5 other patients could not have the operation for bad body conditions, serious basic-diseases or local progress of the disease. The 5-year overall survival rate was 68%, and the disease-free survival rate was 47%. Conclusion Neo-adjuvant endocrine therapy has a reliable clinical effect and low side-effects. It is especially suitable for elderly patients excluded from chemotherapy because of internal medical diseases. It can also increase the rate of breast-conserving and surgical excision.
ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy and safety of using tamoxifen sequential with the third generation aromatase inhibitors versus the third generation aromatase inhibitors or tamoxifen alone for postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients.MethodsThe Cochrane Library (Issue 10, 2016), PubMed, EMbase, CNKI, and WanFang Data were searched to collect randomized controlled trials on using tamoxifen sequential with the third generation aromatase inhibitors versus the third generation aromatase inhibitors or tamoxifen alone for postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients from inception to October, 2016. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies, then meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 9 studies involving 22 005 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that the sequential therapy group was superior to the tamoxifen monotherapy group on overall survival (HR=0.71, 95%CI 0.52 to 0.98, P=0.04) and recurrence-free survival (HR=0.60, 95%CI 0.46 to 0.79, P=0.000 3). However, no significant difference was found in overall survival and disease free survival between the sequential therapy group and the aromatase inhibitors monotherapy group. As to adverse events, compared with the tamoxifen monotherapy group, the sequential therapy group could reduce the incidence of endometrial hyperplasia (OR=0.22, 95%CI 0.11 to 0.45, P<0.000 01), death (OR=0.74, 95%CI 0.66 to 0.84, P<0.000 01) and metastasis (OR=0.79, 95%CI 0.68 to 0.91, P=0.001); however, the incidence of bone fracture was higher in sequential therapy group compared with intamoxifen monotherapy group (OR=1.31, 95%CI 1.13 to 1.51, P=0.000 3).ConclusionThe sequential therapy using tamoxifen and the third generation of aromatase inhibitors is better than tamoxifen monotherapy for postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients. However, there is no significant difference in survival benefit between the sequential therapy and aromatase inhibitors monotherapy.
ObjectiveThe growth potential of children with short stature in middle and late adolescence may be limited by the effect of estrogen on epiphyseal closure. In recent years, the third generation of non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors (AIs) have been used in the treatment of short stature but with off-label. This study aimed to systematically review the efficacy and safety of the third-generation non-steroidal AIs in the treatment of children with short stature, and to provide evidences for rational drug use in clinical practice. MethodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP and CBM from inception to December 28, 2022. Relevant studies on the treatment for children with short stature using the recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) combined with or without the third-generation non-steroidal AIs were collected. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 18 articles were finally included, involving 9 randomized controlled trials and 9 cohort studies, with a total of 1 053 patients. The Meta-analysis showed that: (1) in terms of efficacy, the final adult height (MD=2.48, 95%CI 2.02 to 2.94, P<0.01), predicted adult height (MD=4.27, 95%CI 2.71 to 5.83, P<0.01), predicted adult height difference (MD=4.26, 95%CI 3.23 to 5.28, P<0.01), bone age (MD=−0.62, 95%CI −0.89 to −0.36, P<0.01), bone age difference/actual age difference (MD=−0.47, 95%CI −0.56 to −0.37, P<0.01), and growth velocity (MD=1.34, 95%CI 0.89 to 1.78, P<0.01) at the end of treatment in the experimental group were better than those in the control group, but there was no statistical difference in the height at the end of treatment between the two groups (MD=4.03, 95%CI −0.01 to 8.06, P=0.05). (2) in terms of safety, the total incidence of adverse events in the experimental group (RR=2.10, 95%CI 1.48 to 2.99, P<0.01) was higher than that in the control group, among which the incidence of adverse events in the endocrine system and skin and subcutaneous tissue system was statistically different between the two groups (P<0.05), and the incidence of adverse events in the hepatobiliary system, kidney and urinary system, metabolism and nutrition, gastrointestinal system, musculoskeletal system, blood and lymph system, vascular and lymphatic system, and neuropsychiatric system was not statistically different between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that the third-generation non-steroidal AIs combined with rhGH can effectively improve the final height of children with short stature, but it may increase the incidence of adverse drug events. Limited by the quality and the follow-up period of the included studies, high-quality studies are still needed to demonstrate the above conclusions and further evaluate the long-term safety of AIs in children with short stature.