Objective To investigate the appropriate indication about removing abdominal drainage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Method The clinical data of 156 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy in our hospital from January 2014 to June 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups, with 76 patients in the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) group and 80 patients in the control group according to the type of indications about removing abdominal drainage. The time of removing abdominal drainage, hospital stay, incidence of postoperative complications, and readmission rate during 30 days after surgery were compared between the2 groups. Results Compared with the control group, the time of removing abdominal drainage 〔(6.2±2.5) dvs. (10.8±2.2) d,P<0.001〕and hospital stay〔(11.8±3.4) dvs. (15.7±3.6) d,P<0.001〕 of the ERAS group were both shorter, incidence of abdominal infection was lower〔1.3% (1/76)vs. 10.0% (8/80), P=0.020〕 , but there was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula 〔18.4% (14/76) vs. 21.3% (17/80)〕 , delayed gastric emptying〔1.4% (1/76) vs. 7.5% (6/80)〕 , and the readmission rate during 30 days after surgery〔5.3% (4/76) vs. 3.8% (3/80)〕 , P>0.05. Conclusions Indications about removing abdominal drainage after pancreaticoduodenectomy by authors are safe.
ObjectiveTo investigate strategies and efficacy of surgical treatment of advanced hepatic alveolar echinococcosis. MethodsThirty-six patients with advanced hepatic alveolar echinococcosis who underwent surgical treatment in our hospital from August 2014 to March 2016 were selected, who were divided into three groups:radical hepatectomy group (15 cases), quasi-radical hepatectomy group (17 cases), and palliative surgery group (4 cases). The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications, and metastasis were analyzed among these three groups. ResultsThe operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and rate of postoperative complications had no significant differences between the radical hepatectomy group and the quasi-radical hepatectomy group. No patient had postoperative recurrence in the radical hepatectomy group. The hepatic portal residual lesion was enlarged for 1 case and the intrahepatic and extrahepatic lesions were stable for the other patients in the quasi-radical hepatectomy group. In the palliative surgery group,the retroperitoneal lesions enlargement was seen in 2 cases and the lesions around the abcess grew progressively in 1 case. ConclusionIndividualized treatment accompanied with multiple-disciplinary treatment and damage-control surgery concept could benefit optimally to patients with advanced hepatic alveolar echinococcosis.