Objective To investigate the effects of tight blood glucose control on the shortterm prognosis of the patients after heart valve replacement, in order to improve treatment effectiveness and lower postoperative complications. Methods A total of 240 patients including 150 males and 90 females underwent mitral valve replacement or mitral and aortic valve replacement were enrolled in this study from January 2007 to December 2008 at the cardiac surgery department of Renmin hospital of Wuhan university. The age of these patients ranged from 19 to 65 years old with an average age of 53.33 years. According to insulin administration time and blood glucose control level, they were randomly separated into two groups. In the experimental group, there were 121 patients who received continuous insulin infusion to maintain postoperative glucose level between 4.4 and 6.1 mmol/L, while 119 patients in the control group received insulin infusion when their glucose level went higher than 11.1 mmol/L to control the level between 6.1 and 11.1 mmol/L. Then the postoperative wound infection, malignant arrhythmia rate, the assisted ventilation time, intensive care unit(ICU) stay time and count of neutrophils were compared and analyzed. Results There was no hospitalized death in both groups. The rate of wound infection（3.31% vs.10.08%, χ2=4.430,P=0.035）, the assisted ventilation time（9.02±2.73 h vs. 10.01±3.58 h, t=2.280,P=0.024）, time for count of leukocytes to decrease to the normal level（11.04±3.16 d vs. 12.05±3.76 d, t=2.168,P=0.031）, average hospitalization time（13.49±3.81 d vs. 14.51±4.02 d,t=2.017,P=0.045）, and count of neutrophils on the third day（0.82±0.04 vs. 0.84±0.05, t=2.644,P=0.009） in the experimental group were significantly lower or shorter than those in the control group. But there was no significant difference between both groups in ICU stay time and the rate of malignant arrhythmia. Conclusion Tight blood glucose control can lower the rate of postoperative wound infection, shorten the assisted ventilation time and hospitalization time, and reduce the usage of antibiotics in patients after heart valve replacement. Accordingly, it can enhance the curative effect, reduce overall medical expenses, and improve prognosis.
Objective To evaluate clinical effects of strict control vs. conventional control of blood glucose in perioperative cardiac surgery. Methods Databases including PubMed, EMbase, HighWire, The Cochrane Library, CBM and VIP were searched to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on strict control vs. conventional control of blood glucose in perioperative cardiac surgery, published from 2000 to 2011. Two reviewers independently screened articles according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed quality of the included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1. Results A total of 8 RCTs involving 2 250 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that compared with the conventional group, the strict control of blood glucose could reduce postoperative short-term mortality (OR=0.52, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.91, P=0.02) and postoperative incidence rate of both atrial fibrillation (OR=0.64, 95%CI 0.43 to 0.96, P=0.03) and incision infection (OR=0.30, 95%CI 0.15 to 0.57, P=0.000 2), and shorten hospital stay (MD=1.75, 95%CI –3.18 to –0.32, Plt;0.02) and time of mechanical ventilation (MD=–0.9, 95%CI –1.43 to –0.38, Plt;0.000 8). Conclusion Current evidence shows that the strict control of blood glucose in perioperative cardiac surgery can reduce postoperative short-term mortality and postoperative incidence rate of both atrial fibrillation and incision infection, shorten hospital stay and time of mechanical ventilation, and have important clinical values and social and economic significance. However, this conclusion has to be proved by more high-quality and large-scale RCTs for the limitation of quantity and quality of the included studies.
Objective Through studying a diabetic patient accompanied with pancreatic cancer by means of evidence-based clinical practice, to find out the relationship between diabetes mellitus and cancer and whether the long-acting insulin glargine increases the risk of cancer or not, which is regarded as a disputable hot issue at present. Methods Such databases as The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2010), OVID-EBM Reviews (1991 to Sept. 2010), MEDLINE (1950 to Sept. 2010) and CNKI (2000 to Sept. 2010) were retrieved to collect high quality clinical evidence, and the best therapy was formulated in accordance with the willingness of patients themselves. Results Eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs), four meta-analyses and one RCT meta-analysis were included. The evidence indicated that: a) Diabetes mellitus was kind of related to the occurrence of malignancies; b) There was no evidence at present showing the relationship between long-acting insulin glargine and cancer; c) Strictly controlling of blood sugar did not increase the risk of tumorigenesis, but hyperglycemia causing cancer was proofless; and d) Whether the diabetic patient with cancer should stop taking long-acting insulin glargine or not should require suggestions from specialists rather than patients themselves. Conclusion No evidence at present shows that tumorigenesis is related to diabetes mellitus, long-acting insulin glargine and strict controlling of blood sugar. It is necessary to require more evidence to decide whether the therapy should be adjusted or not for the diabetic patient with cancer who is in the process of glargine therapy.
Objectives To systemically review and investigate the efficacy of intensive glucose control in Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods Database searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, VIP Database, CNKI, and CBM disc (from the date of establishment of the databases to June 2009) were conducted. Additional studies were retrieved via references of articles and direct contact with the authors to retrieve relevant data. Prospective, randomized controlled trials of intensive glucose control compared with standard therapy in diabetic patients were selected. We accessed the quality of included trials and extracted the relevant data. Statistical analysis was performed using The Cochrane Collaboration’s software RevMan 5.0. Results Eight trials with a total of 37 004 participants were included. The Meta-analysis showed: intensive glucose therapy was associated with a significant 9% reduction in the odds of cardiovascular events [OR=0.91, 95%CI (0.85, 0.98), P=0.007], and a 26% reduction in the microvascular events [OR=0.74, 95%CI (0.60, 0.91), P=0.005]. For the peripheral vascular events, no statistical difference was found between intensive therapy and standard therapy [OR=0.94, 95%CI (0.83, 1.07), P=0.35]. No statistical difference could be found in total mortality [OR=1.00, 95%CI (0.92, 1.08), P=0.98] and cardiovascular mortality [OR=1.03, 95%CI (0.83, 1.28), P=0.77]. Intensive therapy could increase more than 1.1-fold odds of hypoglycemia compared with standard-therapy [OR=2.12, 95%CI (1.24, 3.60), P=0.006]. Conclusions Findings from this meta-analysis suggest that intensive glucose control significantly reduces the risk of cardiovascular events and microvascular events, and increases the risk of hypoglycemia, while no prominent difference is found in mortality.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of diabetic patient education on glycemic control for diabeties. Methods Fifty cases of type 2 diabetic patients with educational interventions from the Diabetic Educational Center of West China Hospital and 50 type 2 diabetic patients without educational intervention were selected randomly. All the patients completed the same questionnaire. The data were analyzed by SPSS 10.0. Results The age of patients in educational group was older and the duration of sickness was longer than those in the control group, but their blood glucoses were better controlled. Conclusions Diabetic patient education is important to improve their glycemic control and decrease the risks and deterioration of diabetic chronic complications.
目的 探讨护理行为对重症急性胰腺炎患者在实时强化血糖控制和治疗中的效果与影响。 方法 选择2010年7月－2011年7月15例采用强化血糖控制研究的急性重症胰腺炎患者，对其实时24 h动态血糖监测的护理方法及要点进行回顾分析。 结果 15例患者顺利完成强化血糖控制的临床研究，血糖值达到目标监测范围（6.1～8.3 mmol/L）的百分比例78.3%，未出现严重并发症。 结论 实时动态的血糖监测、严格执行的强化血糖控制方案及针对性护理措施可为重症胰腺炎患者的血糖强化控制提供安全有效的保证。
ObjectiveTo provide the best evidence for an old diabetic patient who combined with frailty syndrome with the goal of glycemic control, treatment strategy and their prognosis. MethodsPubMed, MEDLINE (Ovid), EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 11, 2015) and CNKI were searched from their inception to Nov. 2015, to collect evidence about the management of glycemic control. Evidences were analyzed by the way of evidenced-based criterions. ResultsOne clinical guideline, one meta-analysis, three RCTs, seven cohort studies and four case-control studies were included. Evidence showed that compared with patient uncombined with frailty, old diabetic patients with frailty had a higher prevalence of dementia, cardiovascular diseases and death; Aggressive glycemic control could not reduce the prevalence of cardiovascular events and the risk of death, while it could increase the risk of falling. Glycemic control was more comprehensive which would be taken frailty into consideration. Diet rich in protein (especially leucine), resistance exercise and reasonable medications based on comprehensive geriatric assessment were proved benefit for the old diabetic patient. ConclusionThe incidence of cardiovascular events, hypoglycemia and mortality are increased in this old diabetic patient who combined with frailty. Maintaining HbA1c around 7.5% is reasonable and diet with enough calorie and rich in protein (especially leucine), resistance exercises should be recommended for the person.
Objective To explore the correlation between blood glucose and self-management behaviors in patients with type 2 diabetic mellitus before initial basal insulin therapy. Methods A convenient sample of 200 patients with type 2 diabetic mellitus who were hospitalized in a tertiary hospital from February to August 2016 were enrolled in the study on a voluntary basis. Patients’ demographic information, fast blood glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, and scores of diabetes self-care activities were gathered through questionnaires. Results A total of 193 valid questionnaires were recovered. Before starting basal insulin therapy, the mean blood glucose and the mean glycosylated hemoglobin of the 193 patients were (12.22±3.95) mmol/L and (10.01±2.38)%, respectively, with 12 patients (6.22%) meeting the goal of fasting blood glucose ≤7 mmol/L and 18 patients (9.33%) meeting the goal of glycosylated hemoglobin <7%, respectively. The total score of self-care activities was 26.76±14.77, in which 3 patients (1.55%) performed well. Spearman analysis demonstrated that the total score of self-care activities was negatively correlated with fast blood glucose ( r=–0.401, P<0.001) and glycosylated hemoglobin (r=–0.227, P=0.028). Conclusions The blood glucose levels and self-management behaviors in diabetic patients at the beginning of initial basal insulin therapy are not optimistic. Enhanced management of type 2 diabetic patients with initial basal insulin therapy is the prerequisite to promote diabetes self-care activities.