Objective To observe the clinical features and outcomes of vitrectomy for diabetic retinopathy (DR) with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods A total of 192 patients (241 eyes) with proliferative DR (PDR) who underwent vitrectomy were enrolled in this study. All the patients were diagnosed as vitreous hemorrhage (VH) because of suddenly decreased vision. There were 93 eyes with tractional retinal detachment (TRD) and six eyes with neovascularization of iris (NVI). The patients were divided into PDR with CRVO group (group A, 41 eyes) and PDR group (group B, 200 eyes) according to the results of fundus examination. All patients received vitrectomy with silicone oil and C3F8 gas tamponade. There were 138 eyes with silicone oil tamponade which including 30 eyes in group A and 108 eyes in group B. The difference of number in silicone oil-filled eyes in two groups was statistically significant (chi;2=5.110,P＜0.05). There were 38 eyes with C3F8 gas tamponade which including six eyes in group A and 32 eyes in group B. There was no difference in C3F8 gas-filled eyes numbers in two groups (chi;2=0.048, P＞0.05). The follow-up ranged from one to 60 months, with the mean of (28.69plusmn;17.28) months. The corrected vision, retinal reattachment, persisting macular edema (ME), neovascular glaucoma (NVG) and repeated VH after surgery were comparatively analyzed. Results Of 241 eyes, there were 41 eyes (17.0%) with CRVO. Before surgery, the differences of corrected vision (Z=-0.138), intraocular pressure (t=0.966), whether there was TRD or not (chi;2=0.412), whether underwent panretinal photocoagulation or not (chi;2=1.416) were not statistically significant (P＞0.05), but the difference of whether NVI were present or not was statistically significant (chi;2=31.724,P＜0.05) between two groups. After surgery, the corrected vision improved in both two groups (Z=2.319, 4.589; P＜0.05). There was no difference of corrected vision after surgery between two groups (Z=0.782,P＞0.05). Postoperative complications occurred in 94 eyes, including 26 eyes in group A and 68 eyes in group B. The differences of incidence of reoperation (chi;2=0.498), retinal reattachment (chi;2=0.818), persisting ME (chi;2=2.722) between two groups after surgery were not statistically significant (P＞0.05). The incidence of repeated VH (chi;2=5.737) and NVG (chi;2=6.604) in group A were higher than those in group B (P＜0.05). Conclusions CRVO is commonly found to coexist with DR in T2DM patients with VH. Combined with CRVO patients are more likely to suffer NVI. Vitrectomy can improve the visual function in PDR with CRVO patients.
Objective To observe the effectiveness of combined therapy of intravitreal injections of ranibizumab and macular grid laser photocoagulation for branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) with macular edema (ME).Methods Forty-six patients of BRVO with ME were enrolled in this study. All the patients were examined for corrected visual acuity of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS), slit lamp microscope, direct ophthalmoscope, intraocular pressure, fundus color photography, fundus fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography. The patients were divided into three groups by different treatments: injection group (18 eyes) received intravitreal injections of ranibizumab only, joint group (17 eyes) received intravitreal injections of ranibizumab combined with grid laser photocoagulation, and laser group (11 eyes) received laser photocoagulation only. The follow-up ranged from three to 15 months, with a mean of (8.0plusmn;3.2) months. The same equipment and methods were used to return visit in follow-up period. Repeated injections were adopted in injection group and joint group according to the results of subsequent visits. Then the repeated times of injection in two groups were compared. The visual acuity, macular retinal thickness (CRT) and ocular and systemic adverse reactions about drugs and treatments were followed up. The last follow-up time was considered as the judgment time for the therapeutic effects. Results The mean repeat times of injection in the injection group was 5.4plusmn;0.4, which more than that in the joint group 3.2plusmn;0.6 (t=12.17,P＜0.05). No ocular or systemic adverse events were observed in follow-up period. ETDRS visual acuity of injection group, joint group and laser group increased by 7.30plusmn;8.68,8.50plusmn;6.04,1.55plusmn;6.85 letters respectively after treatment. The differences were statistically significant before and after treatment in injection group and joint group (t=3.58, 5.78;P＜0.05), but there was no significant difference in laser group (t=0.75,P＞0.05). The difference was not statistically significant between injection group and joint group (t=0.45,P＞0.05). The difference was statistically significant between injection group and laser group, but also between joint group and laser group (t=2.13, 2.81;P＜0.05). CRT of injection group, joint group and laser group decreased by (110.56plusmn;43.08), (125.47plusmn;35.19), (50.73plusmn;19.68) mu;m respectively after treatment, with statistically significant differences (t=-10.89,-14.70, -8.55;P＜0.05). Conclusion In the treatment of BRVO with ME, intravitreal injection of ranibizumab combined with macular grid laser photocoagulation can reduce repeat times of injection, improve visual function and relieve ME.
Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is affected by multiple factors, and there are lots of misunderstanding and disputation on the diagnosis and treatment. Compared with the natural disease course of RVO, there was no safe and effective treatment for RVO at present. Necessary investigation and disputation is helpful to make objective conclusion. We should objectively analyze and evaluate the results of investigation from home and abroad. (Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis, 2007, 23: 155-158)
Objective To investigate the efficacy and the safety of external therapy of ultrasound (ETUS) enhancing thrombolysis on the experimental retinal vein occlusion. Methods The effect of ETUS enhanced thrombolysis and the impact of ultrasound energy and exposure were investigated respectively after both eyes of 51 rabbits with retinal branch vein occlusion created by photodynamic initiated thrombosis were divided into 4 groups. The first 2 groups are the ETUS groups, including one group (15 rabbits) underwent intravenous injection with urokinase (UK) (1700-2200 UK dissolved into 20 ml normal saline), and other group (12 rabbits) underwent intravenous injection with normal saline. In these 2 groups, each rabbit received ETUS treatment (1.0 W/cm2, 20 min) in one eye and the fellow eye did not which was as the control. The latter 2 groups are the energy and duration of ultrasound groups, and 12 rabbits in each group underwent ETUS with the energy of 0.7 and 1.0 W/cm2 respectively. Each of the 2 groups was divided into 3 subgroups (8 rabbits in each) according to the radiated durations (8, 14, and 20 minutes). All of the eyes except the control ones underwent ETUS with 1 MHz ultrasound and 100 Hz pulsed ultrasound once a day for 3 days. Fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) was used to detect the vascular condition 4 days after ETUS, and at the 15th day, retinal light microscopy and electron microscopy were performed. Results The vascular recanalization rate in ETUS+UK treatment group was 66.7%, which is obviously higher than which in single UK group (20.0%, P=0.025), normal saline group (8.3%, P=0.005), and ETUS+ normal saline group (8.3%, P=0.005). The vascular recanalization rates in groups with different energy of ultrasound increased obviously as the radiated durations increased (P=0.006, 0.001), while no apparent effect of energy of ultrasound on the vascular recanalization rate was found in the groups with different radiated duration (Pgt;0.05). The eyes which had undergone ETUS treatment had retinal tissue damage and ultrastructure changes of the retinal ganglion cells (RGC), and deteriorated as the radiated duration increased. Conclusion ETUS may enhance the thrombolysis induced by urokinase in experimental retinal vein occlusion. Simultaneously, ETUS can lead to the damage of retinal tissue and changes of the ultrastructure of RGC. (Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis, 2007, 23: 166-169)
ObjectivesTo evaluate the therapeutic effect of argon laser photocoagulation combined with intravitreous injection of triamcinolone acetonide (TA) on ischemic central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).MethodsArgon laser photocoagulation combined with intravitreous injection of TA was performed on 17 patients (17 eyes) with CRVO between December 2003 and July 2004.ResultsDuring the follow-up of 4-10 months, the visual acuity improved in 16 patients, including alleviated or even disappeared cystoid macular edema (CME) in 5, and recurred macular edema in 5 with decreased visual acuity after 3 months. Six patients had increased ocular pressure after intra-ocular injection which alleviated after treated suitably. No neovascularization in angle or secondary neovascular glaucoma was found.ConclusionArgon laser photocoagulation combined with intravitreous injection of TA may improve the visual acuity and reduce complications in ischemic CRVO, though macular edema may recur in some cases. (Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis, 2005,21:224-225)
Objective To observe the preventive and therapeutic effect of different times, spot reactions and spot density of argon laser photocoagulation on retinal neovas cularization of ischemic retinal vein occlusion (IRVO).Meth9al of 244 patients (268 eyes) with IRVO diagnosed by fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) were treated by HGM argon laser photocoagulator with green-blue light with 200~500 μm lightspot, 0.1~0.5 s, 0.3~1.0 w, and II~III class spot reaction . All capillary nonperfusion areas (CNA) were photocoagulated, and so were the retinal neovascularization in some patients. The follow up periods were from 6 to 60 months. After 3 and 24 weeks after photocoagulation FFA was performed again. Photocoagulation was performed supplementarilly for the new CNA or incompletely photocoagulated areas. Ophthalmoscopic examination and FFA were performed in all the patients after half a year.Results Only 17 eyes (10.6%) with neovascularization were found after preventive photocoagulation in 160 eyes in non-neovacularization group. Sixty-nine eyes(63.9%) with neovascular atrophy and 39 eyes (36 .1%) with unsuccessful photocoagulation were found after therapeutic photocoagulation in 108 eyes in neovascularization group. There was statistical significance between the two groups (P＜0.01). Photocoagulation energy with reaction of III class and density of 1 lightspot diameter was more effective than which with reaction of II~III class and density of 1.5 lightspot diameter or reaction of ≤II class and density of 2 lightspot diameter (P＜0.01). Conclusion Efficacy of preventive photocoagulation is better than which of therapeutic photocoagulation. Photocoagulation energy with reaction of III class and density of 1 lightspot diameter is an effective method for IRVO.(Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis，2003，19：201-268)
Objective The present study focus on the macular branch retinal vein occlusion (MBRVO) with and without laser treatment,and evaluate prospectively whether laser treatment is useful in improving the visual acuity and reducing the macular edema. At the same time to learn the difference of macular light sensitivity before and after laser treatment.Methods Forty-five eyes of forty-five patients with MBRVO and macular edema were randomized to laser treatment and no laser treatment. Follow up examinations were performed every 3 months. We compared the difference of visual improvement, resolution of macular edema between the two groups. The central 30°visual field of 20 patients with MBRVO were examined at pretreatment and 3 months after laser treatment. A comparison of light sensitivity at fovea ，central 10°and 11~30°eccentricity were done between before and after laser treatment. Results Comparison of visual improvement and resolution of macular edema showed a statistical difference between laser treatment and no laser treatment. The mean reduction of macular light sensitivity at the fovea and 11~30°3 months after the treatment has no statistical difference between before and after treatment (Pgt;0.05). But the mean light sensitivity at central 10°eccentricity were significantly decreased 3 months after photocoagulation (Plt;0.05).Conclusion The laser treatment might promote or accelerate visual acuity recovery and reduce the macular edema. There is no significant difference about the efficiency on macular function after laser treatment.(Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis，2003，19：201-268)