Objective To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of computer-assisted preoperative planning system—ACL Detector in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Methods Between March 2009 and January 2012, 80 patients with ACL rupture received arthroscopic ACL single-bundle reconstruction with autologous hamstring tendon transplantation. Before operation, the preoperative planning was done by computer-assisted preoperative planning system—ACL Detector (trial group, n=40) or by conventional method (control group, n=40). There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, injury cause, preoperative Lysholm score, and preoperative International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). After operation, the effectiveness was evaluated by Lachman test, pivot shift test, Lysholm score, and IKDC score; the digital three-dimensinal model of knee was reconstructed, and the impingement rate of ACL graft was measured. Results All incisions healed by first intention, and no complication was found. The patients were followed up 18-25 months (mean, 20 months) in trial group and 18-24 months (mean, 21 months) in control group. The Lysholm score and IKDC score were significantly increased at 18 months after operation when compared with preoperative scores (P lt; 0.05), but no significant difference was found between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The results of Lachman test and pivot shift test at 18 months after operation were significantly better than those before operation in 2 groups (P lt; 0.05), but no significant difference between 2 groups after operation (P gt; 0.05). MRI showed that impingement was observed in 1 case of trial group (2.50%) and in 8 cases of control group (20.00%), showing significant difference (χ2=4.51, P=0.03). Conclusion The computer-assisted preoperative planning system—ACL Detector could be successfully applied to ACL reconstruction. It has the same improvement in knee functional score as conventional surgery, but it is better than conventional surgery in reducing the impingement incidence.
Objective To evaluate the security and effectiveness of minimal invasive fixation with fluoroscopybased navigation in the management of pelvic fractures. Methods From April 2007 to June 2008, 22 patients with pelvic fractures were treated with percutaneous screw fixation under the guidance of a fluoroscopy-based navigation system after closed reduction. There were 13 males and 9 females, aged 21-65 years old. Fractures were caused by traffic accident in 17 cases, andfall ing from height in 5 cases. According to AO classification, there were 2 cases of A2.2 type, 2 cases of A2.3 type, 7 cases of B1.2 type, 3 cases of B2.2 type, 1 case of B3.3 type, 2 cases of C1.2 type, 3 cases of C1.3 type, and 2 cases of C2.3 type. The interval from injury to hospital ization was 4 hours to 3 days (mean 1.2 days). After 3-13 days of skeletal traction through tibial tubercle, the operation was performed. Results Totally 42 screws were inserted. The average time for operation was 20.4 minutes per screw. Forty-one screws were inserted correctly with a successful insertion rate of 97.6%, only 1 hollow screw was reinserted for deviation. No incision problem and implant failure occurred. All 22 patients were followed up 7 to 21 months with an average of 14.5 months. At last follow-up, fracture union was achieved in all patients with satisfactory screw fixation. According to Majeed functional scoring, the results were excellent in 18 cases and good in 4 cases, with an excellent and good rate of 100%. Conclusion The minimal invasive fixation with fluoroscopy-based navigation makes the surgery for the pelvic fracture more precise and time-saving, and improves cl inical results without an increasing rate of compl ications.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical significance of individualized reference model of sagittal curves by three-dimensional (3D) printing technique and computer-aided navigation system for lumbar spondylolisthesis. MethodsBetween February 2011 and October 2012, 66 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) by traditional operation in 36 cases (control group) and by individualized reference model of sagittal curves by 3D printing technique and computer-aided navigation system in 30 cases (trial group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, segment, type of disease, degree of spondylolisthesis, and preoperative the visual analogue scale (VAS) of low back pain and leg pain between 2 groups (P>0.05). The operation time, blood loss, fluoroscopy times, VAS score of low back pain and leg pain were compared between 2 groups; the sagittal screw angle (SSA), accuracy rate of pedicle screw, Taillard index, disc height recovery rate, and sagittal angle recovery rate were compared between 2 groups. ResultsThere was no significant difference in operation time and blood loss between 2 groups (P>0.05). But fluoroscopy times of control group were significantly higher than those of trial group (P<0.05). One case had radicular symptoms after operation in control group. The patients of 2 groups were followed up 24-36 months (mean, 26 months). The VAS scores of low back pain and leg pain at last follow-up were significantly better than pre-operative scores in 2 groups (P<0.05); VAS score of low back pain in trial group at last follow-up was significantly lower than that in control group (P<0.05). The accuracy rate of pedicle screw was 81.9% (118/144) in control group and 91.7% (110/120) in trial group, showing significant difference (χ2=5.25, P=0.03). There was significant difference in SSA between 2 groups at immediate after operation (t=-6.21, P=0.00). At immediate after operation and last follow-up, Taillard index, disc height recovery rate, and sagittal angle recovery rate in trial group were significantly better than those in control group (P<0.05). ConclusionPLIF by individualized reference model of sagittal curves by 3D printing technique and computer-aided navigation system can effectively correct spondylolisthesis, recover the lumbar sagittal angle and improve the VAS score of low back pain though it has similar operation time and blood loss to traditional PLIF.
ObjectiveTo conclude the revision reason of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) using computer-assisted technology so as to provide reference for reducing the revision incidence and improving the level of surgical technique and rehabilitation. MethodThe relevant literature on analyzing revision reason of UKA using computer-assisted technology in recent years was extensively reviewed. ResultsThe revision reasons by computer-assisted technology are fracture of the medial tibial plateau, progressive osteoarthritis of reserved compartment, dislocation of mobile bearing, prosthesis loosening, polyethylene wear, and unexplained persistent pain. ConclusionsComputer-assisted technology can be used to analyze the revision reason of UKA and guide the best operating method and rehabilitation scheme by simulating the operative process and knee joint activities.
Objective To explore the effectiveness of computer-aided technology in the treatment of primary elbow osteoarthritis combined with stiffness under arthroscopy. Methods The clinical data of 32 patients with primary elbow osteoarthritis combined with stiffness between June 2018 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 22 males and 10 females with an average age of 53.4 years (range, 31-71 years). X-ray film and three-dimensional CT examinations showed osteophytes of varying degrees in the elbow joint. Loose bodies existed in 16 cases, and there were 7 cases combined with ulnar nerve entrapment syndrome. The median symptom duration was 2.5 years (range, 3 months to 22.5 years). The location of bone impingement from 0° extension to 140° flexion of the elbow joint was simulated by computer-aided technology before operation and a three-dimensional printed model was used to visualize the amount and scope of impinging osteophytes removal from the anterior and posterior elbow joint to accurately guide the operation. Meanwhile, the effect of elbow joint release and impinging osteophytes removal was examined visually under arthroscopy. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS), and elbow range of motion (extension, flexion, extension and flexion) were compared between before and after operation to evaluate elbow function. Results The mean operation time was 108 minutes (range, 50-160 minutes). All 32 patients were followed up 9-18 months with an average of 12.5 months. There was no other complication such as infection, nervous system injury, joint cavity effusion, and heterotopic ossification, except 2 cases with postoperative joint contracture at 3 weeks after operation due to the failure to persist in regular functional exercises. Loose bodies of elbow and impinging osteophytes were removed completely for all patients, and functional recovery was satisfactory. At last follow-up, VAS score, MEPS score, extension, flexion, flexion and extension range of motion significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones (P<0.05). Conclusion Arthroscopic treatment of primary elbow osteoarthritis combined with stiffness using computer-aided technology can significantly reduce pain, achieve satisfactory functional recovery and reliable effectiveness.