Objective To learn and analyse the current clinicians’ knowledge and attitudes towards patient safety, and to provide relevant evidence for future medical education. Method We conducted a survey on clinicians mainly in West China Hospital of Sichuan University with group random sampling method. We analysed the data on the clinicians’ knowledge and attitudes with SPSS softerware. Result Totally 300 questionnaires were distributed, of which 258 were completed adequately. The results showed the clinicians’ knowledge on patient safety was poor, however, the respcnse from the clinicians in Outpatient Department were better than those in Inpatient Department. The majority of the clinicians (above 95.00%) were willing to learn the knowledge of patient safety. Conclusion As the clinicians are willing to learn the knowledge of patient safety positively, it is necessary to integrate patient safety education into the current medical education curriculum.
ObjectiveTo understand the pre-hospital emergency medical staff's knowledge on crush injury and crush syndrome, and the influence of active and effective pre-hospital measures on the prognosis of patients with crush injury. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 51 patients with crush injury treated from September 2004 to August 2014, and recorded the number of cases in which pre-hospital emergency medical staff recognized and/or took effective measures to control crush syndrome. Treatment group included those patients who accepted effective prevention and control measures, and the rest of the patients were included in the control group. We compared the two groups of patients in terms of the incidence of serious complications such as crush syndrome and amputation. ResultsTwenty-five cases (49.0%) of crush injury were recognized before the patients were admitted into the hospital, among whom 20 (39.2%) accepted effective preventive and control measures. The mangled extremity severity score between the two groups of patients had no significant difference (6.69±1.96 vs. 7.23±3.54, P>0.05). After being admitted into the hospital, the treatment group had one complication case of crush injury, while the control group had 10 complication cases including 7 of crush injury and 3 of amputation. The complication rate of the treatment group (5.0%) was significantly lower than that of the control group (32.3%, P<0.05). ConclusionActive and effective prehospital preventive and control measures are very important in the treatment of crush syndrome and reduction of morbidity, but the pre-hospital emergency personnel's knowledge of crush injury and crush syndrome is not enough.
Objective To explore the awareness of thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke in inpatients with a history of stroke and with a high risk of stroke. Methods From January to August 2012, using self-designed questionnaire, trained neurologists conducted the face to face investigation in 500 inpatients with a high risk of stroke, including those with a history of stroke in Department of Neurology in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. Results A total of 467 valid questionnaires were recovered. Only 16.1% (75/467) patients were aware of thrombolytic therapy for acute stroke, of whom 50.7% (38/75) knew the time window of thrombolytic therapy. Awareness of thrombolytic therapy was higher in patients aged 56-70 years, with a higher level of education and income, and in those who knew at least 3 stroke warning signs and those with a history of stroke. While awareness of the time window of thrombolytic therapy was higher in those unmarried or widowed and with a history of stroke. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that awareness of thrombolytic therapy was independently associated with age, education level, knowledge of stroke warning signs and a history of stroke; awareness of the time window was associated with marital status and a history of stroke (P<0.05). Conclusions Inpatients with a history of stroke and with a high risk of stroke in the Department of Neurology have poor awareness of thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke. It is necessary to improve the level of patients’ knowledge about thrombolytic therapy for acute stroke by health education.