Objective To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of iris-registration in wavefront-guided LASIK (IR+WG LASIK) versus conventional LASIK for correction of myopia accompanied with astigmatism. Methods Such databases as PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane library (Issue 2, 2012), CBM, CNKI, VIP, and WangFang Data were searched to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs about IR+WG LASIK versus conventional LASIK for correction of myopia accompanied with astigmatism. The retrieval time was from inception to February 2012, and the language was in both Chinese and English. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted the data and assessed the quality of the included studies. Then the meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.1 software. Results A total of 9 studies involving 3 903 eyes were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with the conventional LASIK group, the IR+WG LASIK group had a higher ratio in patients with postoperative uncorrected visual acuity no less than 1.0 (RR=1.03, 95%CI 1.01 to 1.05, P=0.002), as well as in patients with best-corrected visual acuity gained over 1 line (RR=1.75, 95%CI 1.49 to 2.16, Plt;0.000 01); it was smaller in the postoperative high order aberration RMS (WMD=−0.16, 95%CI −0.21 to −0.11, Plt;0.000 01), coma-like RMS (WMD=−0.05, 95%CI −0.11 to 0.00, P=0.07), spherical-like RMS (WMD=−0.15, 95%CI −0.23 to −0.07, P=0.000 2), and residual astigmatism (WMD=0.14, 95%CI 0.10 to 0.18, Plt;0.000 01); moreover, it was lower in the incidence of postoperative glare (RR=0.27, 95%CI 0.15 to 0.50, Plt;0.000 1), and it was higher in the subjective satisfaction of patients (RR=1.08, 95%CI 1.04 to 1.13, P=0.000 3). Conclusion Compared with conventional LASIK, IR+WG LASIK can more effectively reduce astigmatism, postoperative high order aberration RMS and spherical-like RMS. It can also get visual function including uncorrected visual acuity and best-corrected visual acuity, consequently increase patient’s satisfaction. But further studies are still required for its long-term effect.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the prediction models of blood-based biomarkers for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MethodsThe PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, VIP, WanFang Data and CNKI databases were electronically searched to collect studies related to the objectives from inception to June, 2023. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed by using RevMan 5.4.1 software. ResultsA total of 8 studies were included and all of them were retrospective cohort studies. The models were internally validated in 2 studies and externally validated in 4 studies. The performances of the eight predictive models were stable, which was measured by the area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic curve lying between 0.664 and 0.783. However, the risk of bias was high, which may mainly be reflected in data processing, model validation and performance adjustment. Meta-analysis showed that LDH (HR=1.86, 95%CI 41.32 to 2.63, P<0.01), dNLR (HR=2.15, 95%CI 1.56 to 2.96, P<0.01) and NLR (HR=1.71, 95%CI 1.08 to 2.69, P=0.02) were independent factors of prognosis for NSCLC patients. Conclusion Current evidence shows that the NSCLC prediction models based on peripheral blood biomarkers are still in the development stage, and the models have a high risk of bias.
Objective To systematically review the effectiveness of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (En-DCR) with versus without Mitomycin C (MMC) for nasolacrimal obstruction. Methods Databases such as PubMed, EMbase, CENTRAL (Issue 12, 2012), VIP, WanFang Data, CBM and CNKI were electronically searched to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which investigated the comparison between En-DCR with and without MMC for nasolacrimal obstruction. The searched data was updated to December 31st, 2012. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, literature was screened, data were extracted, and the methodological quality of the included studies was also assessed. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2.0 software and the quality of evidences was graded using GRADEpro 3.6 software. Results A total of 9 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. The results of meta-analysis showed that, the recovery rate in the MMC group was significantly elevated (RR=1.13, 95%CI 1.04 to 1.22, P=0.003), the area of ostium in the MMC group was bigger at 1, 6 and 12 months than in the control group, postoperatively (MD=6.68 mm2, 95% 5.43 to 7.94, Plt;0.000 01; MD=11.61 mm2, 95%CI 4.67 to 18.55, P=0.001; MD=15.65 mm2, 95%CI 2.95 to 28.34, P=0.02), respectively, but the area of ostium in the MMC group at the third month was bigger than that in the control group (MD=8.20 mm2, 95%CI –6.67 to 23.08, P=0.28). The operative time was significantly prolonged in the MMC group (MD=10.1 min, 95%CI 8.00 to 12.20, Plt;0.000 01). Conclusion En-DCR combined with MMC could improve the recovery rate and prevent the over shrinkage of ostium area effectively due to nasolacrimal obstruction.