Objective To diagnose and treat a patient with obstructive jaundice and hepatic bile duct tumor by multi-disciplinary team (MDT) and to provide individualized treatment. Methods By MDT model, a patient with obstructive jaundice and hepatic bile duct tumor, who was ever misdiagnosed as hilar cholangiocarcinoma, was discussed. The diagnosis, perioperative period management, and operation scheme were carried out by the MDT. Results After discussion of MDT, the patient was diagnosed as " hepatocellular carcinoma with bile duct tumor thrombi”, not " hilar cholangiocarcinoma”. Although hepatocellular carcinoma with bile duct tumor thrombi was end-stage disease, radical treatment was still considered. A plan of treatment was carried out by the MDT. Firstly, the percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage was operated for the predicted reserved half liver to relieve biliary obstruction. Secondly, hemihepatectomy combined with bile duct resection was carried out by the surgery team. The patient had nice postoperative recovery and there was no tumor recurrence after 6-month follow-up after surgery up to now. Conclusions MDT model do not only reduce misdiagnose, but also can provide the best therapeutic regimen and individualized treatment for patient presented with obstructive jaundice and hepatic bile duct tumor.
ObjectiveTo investigate the role of multiple disciplinary team (MDT) during surgical treatment of renal secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT), and identify management points of Departments of Nephrology and Endocrinology.MethodsThe data of patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing surgical treatment for SHPT in West China Hospital of Sichuan University between January 2009 and December 2018 were retrospectively collected. We explained the surgical treatment of MDT in the management of renal SHPT, and compared the changes before and after the establishment of MDT.ResultsA total of 187 patients including 101 males and 86 females were enrolled, with an average age of (47.60±11.28) years old and median dialysis vintage of 7 years. Under MDT, the number of patients with parathyroidectomy increased [(8.50±5.10) vs. (59.50±2.12) patients/year, P<0.001] and the completion rate of preoperative examinations were greatly improved (P<0.001). The success rate of surgery was also increased (86.8% vs. 97.5%, P=0.010). Proportion of patients who were admitted to the Department of Nephrology was significantly increased (39.7% vs. 84.9%, P<0.001). Most patients after surgery were transferred to the Department of Endocrinology (5.9% vs. 77.3%, P<0.001) to manage postoperative complications and metabolic bone disease, and thus normalized the management of SHPT.ConclusionsThe MDT contributes to management of renal SHPT, which is worthy of popularization and spreading. The management of internal medicine departments during surgical treatment of SHPT based on MDT is important, because they can be helpful to complete preoperative examinations and preoperative preparation as well as to alleviate postoperative complications.
Intravitreal drug injection is a treatment for common chronic fundus diseases such as age-related macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy. The “14th Five-Year” National Eye Health Plan (2021-2025) recommends focusing on fundus diseases and improve the management mode of patients with chronic eye diseases. Therefore, it is imperative to explore how to further optimize the service process of intravitreal injection under the premise of guaranteeing patients' medical safety, to promote medical service efficiency and standardized management level and improve the medical experience of patients. Based on the quality control standard of vitreous cavity injection for retinopathy in China, Chinese fundus disease and related field experts developed the present expert consensus on the establishment of a one-stop intravitreal injection model and the management of its organization after a serious, comprehensive, and complete discussion, focusing on a standardized operation process, quality control, and safety management, providing more references for establishing a suitable intravitreal injection management model for ophthalmology and promoting the development of diagnostic and treatment models for fundus disease in China.
Precision medicine is a medical paradigm founded on individual genetic information amalgamated with extensive clinical data to offer patients precise diagnoses and treatments. Genetic testing forms the cornerstone of accurate diagnosis, and skilled professionals in fields like clinical medicine, molecular biology, and bioinformatics play a crucial role in realizing the potential of precision medicine. This paper presents reference suggestions for the continuing education approach for relevant technical personnel. The main emphasis is on conducting routine face-to-face and hands-on training to enhance theoretical knowledge and professional skills. Secondly, there is a need to modify the training approach by reinforcing molecular biology, bioinformatics, and other courses, enhancing assessment methods, gradually implementing specialized training in precision medicine subspecialties, and ensuring effective clinical practice and management of precision medicine.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effects of multi-disciplinary diagnosis and treatment model based on doctor-patient shared decision making on treatment outcomes, quality of life and postoperative complications of breast cancer patients. MethodsA total of 100 breast cancer patients were included in this study through a prospective randomized controlled design, and were randomly divided into control group and intervention group, with 50 patients in each group. The control group received traditional treatment mode, while the intervention group implemented a multidisciplinary treatment mode based on doctor-patient sharing decision making. The results of treatment, quality of life and postoperative complication rate were compared between the two groups. ResultsThe completion rate of adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy in the intervention group was 94.0%, which was higher than that in the control group (80.0%), and the difference was statistically significant (P= 0.037). The satisfaction rate of postoperative breast appearance in the intervention group was 90.0%, which was higher than that in the control group (60.0%), with statistical significance (P<0.001). There was no significant difference in grade Ⅲ/Ⅳ toxicity between the two groups (P>0.05). After treatment, the scores of patients’ quality of life in the intervention group were higher than those in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P< 0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the intervention group was 6.0%, which was lower than that in the control group (22.0%), and the difference was statistically (P= 0.021). ConclusionsThe application of multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment model based on doctor-patient sharing decision-making in the treatment of breast cancer patients has significantly improved the treatment effect and quality of life, and effectively reduced the rate of postoperative complications. This model provides a new approach to the treatment of breast cancer that is more personalized, comprehensive and efficient.