west china medical publishers
Author
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Author "诸寅" 2 results
  • LONG-TERM RESULTS OF DELAYED REPAIR OF MEDIAN NERVE INJURY

    ObjectiveTo review and analyze the long-term results of delayed repair of median nerve injury. MethodsBetween January 2004 and December 2008, 228 patients with median nerve injury undergoing delayed repair were followed up for more than 4 years, and the clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. There were 176 males (77.19%) and 52 females (22.81%), aged 2-71 years (median, 29 years). The main injury reason was cutting injury in 159 cases (69.74%);203 cases had open injury (89.04%). According to the injury level, injury located at area I (upper arm) in 38 cases (16.67%), at area II (elbow and proximal forearm) in 53 cases (23.25%), at area III (anterior interosseous nerve) in 13 cases (5.70%), and at area IV (distal forearm to wrist) in 124 cases (54.39%). The delayed operations included delayed suture (50 cases, 21.93%), nerve release (149 cases, 65.35%), and nerve graft (29 cases, 12.72%). ResultsFor patients with injury at area I and area II, the results were good in 23 cases (25.27%), fair in 56 cases (61.54%), and poor in 12 cases (13.18%) according to modified Birch and Raji’s median nerve grading system;there was significant difference in the results between 3 repair methods for injury at area II (χ2=6.228, P=0.044), but no significant difference was found for injury at area I (χ2=2.241, P=0.326). Twelve patients (13.18%) needed musculus flexor functional reconstruction. Recovery of thenar muscle was poor in all patients, but only 5 cases (5.49%) received reconstruction. Thirteen cases of nerve injury at area III had good results, regardless of the repair methods. For patients with injury at area IV, the results were excellent in 6 cases (4.84%), good in 22 cases (17.74%), fair in 72 cases (58.06%), and poor in 24 cases (19.35%) according to Birch and Raji’s grading system;there was significant difference in the results between 3 repair methods (χ2=12.646, P=0.002), and the result of delayed repair was better. ConclusionThe results of delayed repair is poor for all median nerve injuries, especially for high level injury. The technique of repair methods vary with injury level. For some delayed median nerve injuries, early nerve transfer may be a better choice for indicative patients.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 内置固定架治疗骨盆骨折致股神经麻痹三例

    目的总结皮下前环内置固定架(INFIX)治疗骨盆骨折致股神经麻痹的原因及处理方法。 方法回顾2013年4月-2015年1月经INFIX方法治疗后发生股神经麻痹的3例骨盆骨折患者临床资料。其中女2例,男1例;年龄分别为26、19、51岁;均为交通事故致伤。INFIX方法治疗后出现股神经麻痹症状,经影像学、神经电生理及彩色超声多普勒检查确诊。待骨折愈合后,二次手术取出内固定物,并联合营养神经治疗;其中2例行股神经松解。 结果患者分别获随访12、22、15个月,股四头肌肌力恢复至4级,可负重行走伴跛行。 结论INFIX治疗骨盆骨折时,如螺钉植入过深、连杆安放层次错误、连杆折弯不充分均可能导致股神经麻痹。对症处理后仍存在股四头肌力量弱以及步态改变。

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content