ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy and adverse reactions of paclitaxel and carboplatin with or without bevacizumab in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).MethodsThe databases including PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, CNKI, Wanfang Data, VIP and CBM were searched from inception to October 2022 to collect randomized controlled trials of the clinical efficacy of paclitaxel and carboplatin with or without bevacizumab for the treatment of NSCLC. RevMan 5.4 software was used for meta-analysis.ResultsEight randomized controlled trials were enrolled, involving a total of 1 724 patients. Meta-analysis showed that for the treatment of NSCLC, the disease control rate, overall response rate, 1-year survival rate, and 2-year survival rate were higher in the trial group (paclitaxel and carboplatin combined with bevacizumab) than those in the control group (paclitaxel and carboplatin) (P<0.05); however, the incidences of the adverse reactions, such as leukopenia, hemorrhage, proteinuria and hypertension, etc, were higher in the trial group than those in the control group (P<0.05). There were no statistical differences between the trial group and the control group in the incidences of fatigue, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia or hyponatremia, etc (P>0.05). In addition, the median progression-free survival and overall survival were longer in the trial group than those in the control group.ConclusionFor the treatment of NSCLC, paclitaxel and carboplatin combined with bevacizumab is superior in terms of disease control, overall response and prolonging patient survival, etc, but will be associated with more adverse reactions.
ObjectiveTo analyze the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy and bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy (BIC), bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy (BC), chemotherapy (CT), immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy (IC), bevacizumab combined with immunotherapy (BI), bevacizumab (B) in the first-line treatment of advanced wild-type non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer. MethodsThe PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched to collect phase Ⅱ/Ⅲ randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to the objectives of the study from January 2010 to December 1, 2022. After two investigators independently screened the literatures, extracted the data and evaluated the risk of bias of the included studies, a reticular meta-analysis was performed using R 3.6.1 software. ResultsA total of 11 RCTs were finally included, including 5 329 patients and six treatment combinations. Meta-analysis results showed that BIC was superior to CT for progression-free survival (PFS) (HR=0.34, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.69), but BIC did not show a significant advantage over the other groups for overall survival (OS). Bayesian ranking results showed that the BIC group had the greatest probability in terms of OS, PFS, and ORR. Among all programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expressing subgroups, there was no significant difference in OS between BIC, BC, IC, CT, BI, and B. Compared with CT, IC was significantly improved in OS (HR=0.68, 95%CI 0.52 to 0.92), PFS (HR=0.58, 95%CI 0.45 to 0.75), and ORR (HR=0.47, 95%CI 0.33 to 0.66). ConclusionIn the first-line treatment of wild-type advanced non-squamous NSCLC, immunotherapy and bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy may improve the efficacy in the short term, but do not change the long-term survival time. Immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy can significantly improve the survival time and prognosis of patients compared with chemotherapy alone. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.