目的报告Vacuseal负压引流系统在腹部外科的应用体会。方法1999年5月至2002年3月，作者对47例腹部手术病例实施Vacuseal引流，其中肝切除术6例，急性胰腺炎胰床松解术7例，胰十二指肠切除术5例，门奇断流术4例，腹腔清创术4例，直、结肠癌根治术10例，切口感染11例。并与同期64例（次）普通负压引流结果进行比较。结果Vacuseal组日均腹腔引流量大于普通引流，引流后伤口肉芽组织情况改善，二期缝合时间缩短，无引流不适反应。结论Vacuseal负压引流的效果明显优于普通负压引流，适用于腹部的脏器切除或严重炎症、低位空腔脏器术后、巨大缺损的伤口感染。
Objective To investigate the causes of the vacuum seal ing drainage (VSD) compl ications during treatment of extremity wounds. Methods Between February 2005 and February 2010, 174 patients with skin and soft tissue defect of extremities were treated with VSD. Among them, 12 patients (6.9%) had compl ications and the cl inical data were analyzed retrospectively. There were 7 males and 5 females aged from 17 to 65 years (mean, 36.1 years). Injury was caused bytraffic accident in 8 cases, and by machine extrusion in 4 cases. The locations were forearm in 3 cases, upper arm in 2 cases, thigh and calf in 1 case, calf in 4 cases, and foot in 2 cases. The size of defect ranged from 10 cm × 7 cm to 90 cm × 40 cm. The time from injury to hospital ization was 3-8 hours (mean, 4.2 hours). Results At 1 day postoperatively, moderate to severe anemia and hypokalemia occurred in 6 cases, and the hemoglobin value increased to 100 g/L and the electrolyte disorder was rectified after blood transfusion and fluid infusion. At 2 days, 2 patients had local skin allergic symptoms, and local rash disappeared after oral administration of Clarityne. At 3 days, 2 patients complained pain and the pain was released after the suction pressure was decreased by 50%; 2 patients had infection and received VSD demol ition, debridement and draining, and anti-infection treatment. Tissue necrosis occurred in 1 case at 4 days and pressure ulcer in 1 case at 5 days, VSD was immediately changed and wound was repaired by spl it thickness skin graft or local flap. Conclusion Compl ications associated with VSD therapy for the wounds of the extremities are not very common. Most causes are related to the location of wound, the technique of the operators, and the conditions of the patients.
目的 探讨游离股外侧肌瓣联合封闭式负压吸引技术（VSD）修复四肢软组织缺损的临床效果。 方法 2009年6月－2011年6月，对25例四肢软组织缺损患者采用游离股外侧肌瓣联合VSD治疗对创面经彻底清创后，先行VSD覆盖，5～9 d后去除VSD负压膜。再次清创受区，切取股外侧肌瓣修复创面，处理血管危象，二期植皮。 结果 25例均获得随访，时间6～12个月。经负压封闭引流后，局部创面无明显感染，肌腱及骨外露区周围肉芽组织生长良好。出现血管危象3例，经及时处理后3例肌瓣均恢复血液循环。感染控制良好，无窦道形成，患肢功能恢复满意。 结论 对于严重创伤后的肢体软组织缺损，经彻底清创后，应用封闭式负压引流及游离股外侧肌瓣修复，可明显缩短治疗周期，提高手术成功率，最大限度恢复患肢的功能。
目的 探讨可调压胸腔闭式引流瓶持续负压吸引治疗自发性气胸持续漏气的疗效观察及护理。 方法 将2008年3月－2012年10月收治的自发性气胸行胸腔闭式引流术后接传统闭式引流瓶，引流达3 d胸腔仍有漏气患者55例分为A组（治疗组）、B组（对比组）。Ａ组30例更换为可调压胸腔闭式引流瓶、Ｂ组25例继续使用传统闭式引流瓶。 结果 Ａ组患者平均带管时间缩短，管腔堵塞、引流液逆流、低蛋白血症等并发症发生比Ｂ组减少。 结论 可调压胸腔闭式引流瓶持续胸腔负压吸引治疗自发性气胸持续漏气患者治疗效果优于传统闭式引流好，患者带管时间及平均住院时间缩短，住院费用降低，安全性高，并发症少。
目的:探讨COPD(慢性阻塞性肺病)并自发性气胸的临床特点、治疗及预后。方法:对2001年1月至2008年12月间本院收治的48例COPD并自发性气胸患者进行临床分析。结果:48例COPD并自发性气胸患者临床表现多样,首次确诊率不到80%,死亡率8.25%,单纯抽气治愈10例,胸腔闭式引流治愈22例。胸腔闭式引流+负压吸引治愈15例,手术治疗1例。肺复张平均天数单纯抽气10天, 胸腔闭式引流9天, 胸腔闭式引流+负压吸引7天, 手术治疗15天.结论:COPD并自发性气胸治疗多需排气减压术,复张时间较长,治疗以胸腔闭式引流+负压吸引为宜。