Objective To compare the effectiveness of arthroscopic and open ankle arthrodeses. Methods The clinical data were retrospectively analyzed from 30 patients undergoing unilateral ankle arthrodesis between January 2008 and January 2011. Of 30 patients, 14 underwent arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis (arthroscopic group), and 16 underwent open ankle arthrodesis (open group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, lesion type, disease duration, and preoperative American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospitalization days, postoperative AOFAS score, and bony union rate were observed to evaluate the effectiveness. Results The operation time of arthroscopic group was significantly longer than that of open group (P lt; 0.05); the intraoperative blood loss and postoperative hospitalization days of arthroscopic group were significantly less than those of open group (P lt; 0.05). Superficial infection of incision occurred in 1 case of open group, and healing of incision by first intention was obtained in the other patients. All patients were followed up 12 months. No screw breakage was observed. The X-ray films showed bony fusion in 13 cases (92.86%) of arthroscopic group and in 10 cases (62.50%) of open group at 3 months after operation, showing significant difference (χ2=3.850, P=0.049); but no significant difference was found (χ2=0.910, P=0.341) in bony fusion rate between the arthroscopic group (14/14, 100%) and open group (15/16, 93.75%) at 12 months after operation. The AOFAS scores at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after operation were significantly higher than preoperative score in 2 groups (P lt; 0.05). There was no significant difference in AOFAS score between 2 groups at 1 and 3 months (P gt; 0.05), but significant differences were found at 6 and 12 months (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion The overall effectiveness of arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis is better than that of open ankle arthrodesis, which can decrease intraoperative blood loss, shorten hospitalization days, get higher bony fusion rate, and obtain good ankle function recovery.
Objective To review the latest research progress of fixation techniques of ankle arthrodesis.Methods The l iterature concerning the research of fixation techniques of ankle arthrodesis in recent years was reviewed. Then the characteristics and new research progress of different internal and external fixation techniques were analysed and compared. Results There are plenty of different types of internal and external fixation devices, each with distinct characteristics. Now it is widely considered that internal fixation is the first choice for end-stage ankle arthropathy. However, under the circumstances that patients with serious bone defect, chronic active infection, or extensive soft tissue damage are not suitable for internal fixation, ankle arthrodesis with external fixation is still a safe and effective method. Conclusion For severe or end-stage ankle arthropathy, ankle arthrodesis is a mature therapeutic way with exact effect. Researches on these two aspects, expansion of indications of internal fixation and comparison and combination of internal and external fixation techniques, need to be deepened, which is of great significance for choosing a better fixation method and acquiring a better therapeutic effect.
ObjectiveTo explore the feasibility and short-term effectiveness of ankle arthrodesis by ankle osteotomy-tool. MethodsA retrospective analysis was made on the data of 38 patients with end-stage ankle arthritis undergoing ankle arthrodesis between February 2009 and March 2012. There were 24 males and 14 females, with an average age of 67 years (range, 40-85 years). The left ankle was involved in 18 cases and the right ankle in 20 cases. There were 20 cases of post-traumatic arthritis, 7 cases of avascular necrosis of talus, 5 cases of rheumatoid arthritis, 5 cases of primary osteoarthritis, and 1 case of post infective arthritis. The disease duration ranged 3.2-6.1 years (mean, 4.7 years). The ankle osteotomy-tool was used to remove the joint surfaces, and proximal humeral locking plate combined with compression screws were used for internal fixation. ResultsThe operation time was 40-90 minutes (mean, 60 minutes). The healing of incisions by first intention was obtained in the other cases except 1 case of superficial infection, which was cured after dressing change. Thirty-eight patients were followed up 10 to 36 months (mean, 23 months). The ankles in 4 patients started to swell repeatedly when they walked early after operation and the swelling subsided at 1 year after rehabilitation therapy. The X-ray films showed that bone fusion was obtained at 12 weeks after operation on average (range, 10-19 weeks). No internal fixation failure or malunion occurred. The mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score was improved significantly from 43.11±17.49 at preoperation to 85.03±13.17 at last follow-up (t=14.412, P=0.000). The short-form 36 health survey scale (SF-36) showed that physical component summary score was increased significantly from preoperative 54.30±12.32 to postoperative 77.95±8.21 (t=7.723, P=0.000), and mental component summary score was significantly increased from preoperative 63.16±8.30 to postoperative 77.05±10.12 (t=2.523, P=0.021). According to the patients' satisfaction, 32 patients were very satisfied, 5 patients were satisfied, and 1 patient was not satisfied. The subjective satisfaction of patients was 97.37%. ConclusionAnkle arthrodesis by lateral malleolus osteotomy with ankle osteotomy-tool and internal fixation using proximal humeral locking plate and compression screws has the advantages of simple operation, less complications, rigid fixation, and high fusion rate. It may obtain a good short-term effectiveness.
Objective To compare the effectiveness of supramalleolar osteotomy (SMOT) and ankle arthrodesis (AA) in the treatment of inverted ankle osteoarthritis (OA) in Takakura 3A stage with talus tilt. Methods The clinical data of 41 patients with inverted ankle OA in Takakura 3A stage with talus tilt admitted between January 2016 to January 2020 and met the selection criteria were retrospectively analyzed, and they were divided into SMOT group (21 cases) and AA group (20 cases) according to the surgical method. There was no significant difference in baseline data such as gender, age, affected side, cause of injury, and preoperative talar tilt angle (TT), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, short-form 36 health survey scale (SF-36) score, and sagittal range of motion (ROM) between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, partial weight-bearing time, and complications were recorded in the two groups. AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score, VAS score, SF-36 score, and sagittal ROM were used to evaluate the effectiveness. Bone healing was observed and the time of bony healing was recorded. In the SMOT group, the tibial lateral surface angle (TLS), TT, and the tibial articular surface angle (TAS) were measured on ankle joint weight-bearing anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films and compared with those before operation. And Takakura staging assessment was also performed. ResultsThe operation time and intraoperative blood loss in AA group were significantly less than those in SMOT group (P<0.05). Patients in both groups were followed up 24-36 months, with an average of 28.9 months. Incision infection occurred in 2 patients in SMOT group and 1 patient in AA group, respectively, and no vascular or nerve injury occurred in both groups. The partial weight-bearing time of SMOT group was significantly less than that of AA group (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in bony healing time between the two groups (P>0.05). At last follow-up, the difference of VAS score and SF-36 score before and after operation of AA group were less than those of SMOT group, and the difference of sagittal ROM before and after operation in SMOT group was less than that of AA group, with significant differences (P<0.05). The difference of AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score before and after operation in AA group was slightly greater than that in SMOT group, but the difference was not significant (P>0.05). The above scores in both groups significantly improved when compared with those before operation (P<0.05). Sagittal ROM in AA group was significantly less than that before operation (P<0.05), while there was no significant difference in SMOT group (P>0.05). In the SMOT group, 17 patients (81.0%) showed improvement in imaging staging, 2 patients (9.5%) showed no improvement in staging, and 2 patients (9.5%) showed stage aggravation. TLS, TAS, and TT significantly improved when compared with those before operation (P<0.05). At last follow-up, 2 patients in SMOT group received AA due to pain and stage aggravation, and 1 patient with bone nonunion underwent bone graft. Subtalar joint fusion was performed in 1 case of subtalar arthritis in AA group.Conclusion For inverted ankle OA in Takakura 3A stage with talus tilt, both SMOT and AA can significantly releave pain, improve foot function and quality of life, but AA has more definite effectiveness and better patient satisfaction.