Curcumin-loaded poly (α-isobutyl cyanoacrylate) microspheres (Cur-HP-β-CD-PiBCA) were prepared by one-step emulsification with α-isobutyl cyanoacrylate as materials, poloxamer 188 as emulsifier, and curcumin complex with hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (Cur-HP-β-CD) as drug prepared by kneading method. Effects of emulsifier and drug concentration on microspheres size and distribution, drug loading and encapsulation efficiency were investigated in detail. And the curcumin release of drug-loaded microspheres was also studied. Results showed that as the emulsifier concentration increased from 0.01% to 0.07%, particle size of the drug-loaded microspheres decreased while particle size distribution, drug loading and entrapment efficiency increased. The optimized concentration of surfactant was 0.05%. With increasing the concentration of drug from 0.03% to 0.07%, drug loading of Cur-HP-β-CD-PiBCA increased, but encapsulation efficiency decreased. Additionally, the results of drug release experiments revealed that the higher drug loading of Cur-HP-β-CD-PiBCA was, the lower cumulative release percentage was. Drug-loading of cumulative inclusions in HP-β-CD by PiBCA can improve its wettability, and increase the degree of dissolution and bioavailability.
ObjectiveTo summarize the research progress of four mainstream drug-eluting beads (DEB) in transcathete arterial chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma in recent years.MethodThrough retrieving relevant literatures at home and abroad, the physicochemical properties, pharmacokinetics, effectiveness, and safety of four mainstream DEBs were reviewed.ResultsThe current mainstream DEBs on the market had the characteristics of high drug loading rate and sustained release of drugs, which could reduce the adverse reactions after the embolization to a certain extent. The safety and tolerance of patients receiving DEB-TACE were slightly higher than those receiving traditional TACE (c-TACE). There were no serious complications after the DEB-TACE, but the short-term and long-term efficacies between the two methods were not significantly different.ConclusionsAt present, most studies believe that the safety and tolerance of DEB are slightly higher than that of c-TACE, but whether the former is more effective than the latter is still controversial at home and abroad, and more high-quality multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm it.