ObjectiveTo evaluate the full thickness idiopathic macular hole (IMH) closure rates in patients positioning non-supine (NSP) compared with patients positioning face-down (FDP). MethodsA computerized search was conducted in the PubMed, Chinese Biomedical Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and VIP database. All the included studies were divided into NSP and FDP group. A total of 9 papers were included in this meta analysis, including 285 eyes (145 eyes with small hole ≤400 μm, 104 eyes with large hole >400 μm) in NSP group and 303 eyes (141 eyes with small hole and 124 eyes with large hole ). RevMan 4.2 software was applied for investigating heterogeneity and meta-analysis, and the risk of publication bias was evaluated. ResultsMeta analysis indicated that there was statistical significance on closure rates betwen NSP and FDP group. The difference of closure rates in small macular hole eyes between NSP and FDP group was statistically significant (OR=0.45, 95%CI 0.13-1.51;P=0.20). The difference of closure rates in large macular hole eyes between NSP and FDP group was statistically significant (OR=0.35, 95%CI 0.17-0.75;P=0.006). ConclusionNSP is equally effective as strict FDP in the repair of small macular hole. Post-operative FDP may improve the macular hole closure rates for holes larger than 400 μm.