west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "重组人粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子" 2 results
  • 全肺灌洗术联合皮下注射重组人粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子治疗原发性肺泡蛋白沉积症一例并文献复习

    肺泡蛋白沉积症(PAP)是一种罕见的疾病,其特征是肺泡内间歇蓄积PAS染色阳性的富含磷脂的蛋白质样物质,从而影响到肺泡的气体交换,导致呼吸困难、低氧血症等一系列临床综合征。PAP可分为原发性、继发性和先天性三种类型,其中90%是原发性PAP,其发病原因不明。目前原发性PAP最常用的治疗方法是全肺灌洗术,但该治疗需在全身麻醉下进行,设备要求高,有一定的风险,且疗效难以持久。现报告1例经过全肺灌洗术后效果不佳,再联合皮下注射重组人粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(rHuGlV1.CSF,特尔立,厦门特宝生物工程有限公司)治疗后病情明显好转的原发性PAP患者,并结合相关文献,以加深对这种新疗法的认识。

    Release date:2016-09-14 11:56 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • EFFECT OF RECOMBINANT HUMAN GRANULOCYTE-MACROPHAGE COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR ON WOUND DEBRIDEMENT AND HEALING OF DEEP II THICKNESS BURN

    Objective To investigate the effectiveness and mechanism of recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhGMCSF) gel on wound debridement and healing of deep II thickness burn. Methods Between December 2008 and December 2010, 58 patients with deep II thickness burn, accorded with the inclusive criteria, were collected. There were 36 males and 22 females with an average age of 32.4 years (range, 12-67 years). The causes were hot liquid in 38 cases and fire in 20 cases. The time from injury to treatment was 1-3 days (mean, 2.1 days). In this randomized, double-blind, and self-control study, all patients were randomly divided into 2 groups, wounds were treated with rhGMCSF gel (test group) or gel matrix (control group). There was no significant difference in wound area between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The time of completed removal eschar and the percentage of removal-area of eschar were recorded at 2, 6, 10, 14, and 18 days during healing process. The time of wound healing was also recorded. Results Compared with control group, the necrotic tissues on the burn wound got soft in test group at 4 days after treatment. At 6 days, they loosened and eventually sloughed off. The wound bed presented in red and white, followed by rapidly growing granulation tissues. Except 18 days after treatment, there were significant differences in the percentage of removal-area of eschar between 2 groups (P lt; 0.05). The time of completed removal eschar in test group [(7.71 ± 2.76) days] was significantly shorter than that in control group [(14.71 ± 3.63) days] (t=13.726, P=0.000). The time of wound healing in test group was (18.41 ± 2.47) days, which was significantly shorter than that in control group [(23.58 ± 3.35) days] (t=15.763, P=0.000). Conclusion Compared with the gel matrix, the rhGMCSF gel may promote wound debridement and healing in deep II thickness burn.

    Release date:2016-08-31 05:45 Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content