Objective To compare the clinical results of locking compress plate (LCP) as an external fixator and standard external fixator for treatment of tibial open fractures. Methods Between May 2009 and June 2012, 59 patients with tibial open fractures were treated with LCP as an external fixator in 36 patients (group A), and with standard external fixator in 23 patients (group B). There was no significant difference in gender, age, cause of injury, affected side, type of fracture, location, and interval between injury and surgery between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The time of fracture healing and incision healing, the time of partial weight-bearing, the range of motion (ROM) of knee and ankle, and complications were compared between 2 groups. Results The incidence of pin-track infection in group A (0) was significantly lower than that in group B (21.7%) (P=0.007). No significant difference was found in the incidence of superficial infection and deep infection of incision, and the time of incision healing between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Deep vein thrombosis occurred in 5 cases of group A and 2 cases of group B, showing no significant difference (χ2=0.036, P=0.085). All patients were followed up 15.2 months on average (range, 9-28 months) in group A, and 18.6 months on average (range, 9-47 months) in group B. The malunion rate and nonunion rate showed no significant difference between groups A and B (0 vs. 13.0% and 0 vs. 8.7%, P gt; 0.05); the delayed union rate of group A (2.8%) was significantly lower than that of group B (21.7%) (χ2=5.573, P=0.018). Group A had shorter time of fracture healing, quicker partial weight-bearing, greater ROM of the knee and ankle than group B (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion The LCP external fixator can obtain reliable fixation in treating tibial open fracture, and has good patients’ compliance, so it is helpful to do functional exercise, improve fracture healing and function recovery, and reduce the complication incidence.
Based on the CT data and the structure characteristics of the femoral fractures during different healing stages, medical FE models of fractured femur treated with locking compression plate (LCP)were built.Under the physiological load of a standard body weight (70 kg) and the constraint condition,the stress distributions of LCP and fractured femur during healing were calculated by means of three-dimensional finite element analysis (3D-FEA).The results showed that the stress distribution in the LCP and the fractured femur was similar,during the initial stage which there was no newly formed bone or soft tissue in fracture site.The maximum von Mises stress (371.23,272.76 MPa) in the fractured femur was much higher than that in natural femur,and the intensive stress was concentrated mainly in the proximal area of the fractured femur.With the growth of bony callus bone in fracture site,the intensity of stress in proximal femur decreased.Contrasted to the two cases mentioned above,the value of the maximum von Mises stress (68.17 MPa) in bony callus bone stage decreased significantly,and was lower than the safe strength of natural bone.Therefore,appropriate training which is benefitial for the growth to new bone could be arranged for the better rehabilitation.
Objective To compare the effectiveness of the proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) and locking compression plate (LCP) in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures with the lateral unsubstantial femoral wall in elderly patients. Methods Between May 2009 and August 2012, 69 elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures with the lateral unsubstantial femoral wall were treated. Fractures were fixed with PFNA in 36 patients (PFNA group), and with LCP in 33 patients (LCP group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, injury cause, side of fracture, and fracture AO type between 2 groups (P > 0.05). The incision length, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, total blood loss, fluoroscopy frequency, time for ambulation, and early (within 3 months) and late (more than 12 months) complications were compared. Fracture healing was assessed according to X-ray reexamination, the function of the hip joint was assessed according to the Harris hip scoring system. Results The incision length, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and time for ambulation of PFNA group were significantly less than those of LCP group (P < 0.05), but the fluoroscopy frequency of PFNA group was significantly more than that of LCP group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in total blood loss between 2 groups (t=-1.686, P=0.096). The patients were followed up 12-24 months in PFNA group and 15-30 months in LCP group. The X-ray reexamination revealed fracture healing at (12.667±2.527) weeks in patients of PFNA group, and at (13.364±1.194) weeks in the others of LCP group except 1 case of nonunion, showing no significant difference (t=-1.443, P=0.154). There was no significant difference in Harris hip score between PFNA group (84.611±7.076) and LCP group (81.785±7.500) at 12 months after operation (t=1.626, P=0.109). The early complication rate and late complication rate were 16.7% (6/36) and 5.6% (2/36) in PFNA group and were 9.1% (3/33) and 9.1% (3/33) in LCP group, all showing no significant difference between 2 groups (χ2=0.871, P=0.481; χ2=0.320, P=0.665). Conclusion Both PFNA and LCP have good effectiveness in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures with the lateral unsubstantial femoral wall in the elderly patients. Each has its own advantages and disadvantages.
ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA), locking compression plate (LCP), and artificial femoral head replacement for femoral intertrochanteric fracture in aged patients so as to provide reference for clinical treatment.MethodsA retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 150 aged patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture treated between September 2009 and March 2016. PFNA was used in 51 cases (group A), LCP in 53 cases (group B), and artificial femoral head replacement in 46 cases (group C). There was no significant difference in sex, age, side, cause of injury, injury to operation time, type of fracture, and combined medical diseases between groups (P>0.05). The incision length, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, time for full weight bearing, hip Harris score, and complications were recorded and compared between groups.ResultsThe patients were followed up 12-23 months (mean, 18.6 months) in group A, 12-25 months (mean, 19.0 months) in group B, and 12-24 months (mean, 18.9 months) in group C. The incision length, operation time, and intraoperative blood loss of group A were significantly less than those of groups B and C (P<0.05); the operation time of group C was significantly shorter than that of group B (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in incision length and intraoperative blood loss (P>0.05). The time for full weight bearing was significantly shorter in group C than groups A and B, and in group A than group B (P<0.05). Postoperative complications occurred in 11 patients of group A (21.6%), 14 patients of group B (26.4%), and 2 patients of group C (4.3%), showing significant difference between group C and group A or group B (P<0.05), but no significant difference was found between groups A and B (P>0.05). Hip Harris score at 12 months after operation had no significant difference between groups (P>0.05).ConclusionPFNA, LCP, and artificial femoral head replacement are all effective methods to treat femoral intertrochanteric fracture in aged patients. PFNA has the advantages of small incision, short operation time, less bleeding and simple procedure, and artificial femoral head replacement has the advantages of early time for full weight bearing, less bed rest time, and less complications. For these patients, PFNA and artificial femoral head replacement are appropriate.