west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "附加钢板" 2 results
  • 微创附加钢板治疗下肢长骨骨折髓内钉固定术后肥大性骨不连

    目的 总结微创附加钢板治疗下肢长骨骨折髓内钉固定术后肥大性骨不连的可行性和效果。 方法 回顾分析 2010 年 1 月—2015 年 8 月采用微创附加钢板治疗的 11 例下肢长骨骨折髓内钉固定术后肥大性骨不连患者临床资料。男 8 例,女 3 例;年龄 18~63 岁,平均 34.6 岁。股骨 8 例,胫骨 3 例。原始骨折国际内固定研究协会(AO/ASIF)分型:A 型 5 例,B 型 4 例,C 型 2 例。髓内钉固定手术至本次手术时间为 6~22 个月,平均 12.4 个月。术前患者膝关节或踝关节活动度(range of motion,ROM)较对侧减少(30.71±14.72)°。 结果 手术切口均 Ⅰ 期愈合。11 例患者均获随访,随访时间 12~30 个月,平均 14 个月。X 线片示骨折均愈合,愈合时间 4~8 个月,平均 5.7 个月。无感染、神经血管损伤、钢板髓内钉断裂等并发症发生。末次随访时,患膝关节或踝关节 ROM 较对侧减少(15.36±12.17)°,与术前比较差异有统计学意义(t=5.571,P=0.000)。患肢功能恢复按 Schatzker-Lambert 股骨远端骨折功能评分或 Kaikkonen 踝关节损伤功能评分分级法,优 5 例,良 5 例,可 1 例,优良率 90.9%。 结论 微创附加钢板治疗下肢长骨骨折髓内钉固定术后肥大性骨不连,方法简便,安全可行,效果良好。

    Release date:2017-07-13 11:11 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Research progress of augmentation plate for femoral shaft nonunion after intramedullary nail fixation

    ObjectiveTo review the history, current situation, and progress of augmentation plate (AP) for femoral shaft nonunion after intramedullary nail fixation.MethodsThe results of the clinical studies about the AP in treatment of femoral shaft nonunion after intramedullary nail fixation in recent years were widely reviewed and analyzed.ResultsThe AP has been successfully applied to femoral shaft nonunion after intramedullary nail fixation since 1997. According to breakage of the previous nailing, AP is divided into two categories: AP with retaining the previous intramedullary nail and AP with exchanging intramedullary nail. AP is not only suitable for simple nonunion, but also for complex nonunion with severe deformity. Compared with exchanging intramedullary nail, lateral plate, and dual plate, AP has less surgical trauma, shorter healing time, higher healing rate, and faster returning to society. However, there are still some problems with the revision method, including difficulty in bicortical screw fixation, lack of anatomic plate suitable for femoral shaft nonunion, and lack of postoperative function and quality of life assessment.ConclusionCompared with other revision methods, AP could achieve higher fracture healing rate and better clinical prognosis for patients with femoral shaft nonunion. However, whether patients benefit from AP in terms of function and quality of life remain uncertain. Furthermore, high-quality randomized controlled clinical studies are needed to further confirm that AP are superior to the other revision fixations.

    Release date:2019-12-23 09:44 Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content