west china medical publishers
Author
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Author "陆玫竹" 3 results
  • 被动抬腿试验预测容量反应性的最新研究进展

    在重症患者的循环支持中,容量状态的判断非常重要。静态指标及动态指标易受多种因素的影响,容量负荷试验安全性较差,在临床实施时均有一定局限性。被动抬腿试验预测容量反应性具有简单、快速、安全、受干扰小等特点,在不增加患者全身容量的基础上,可以迅速判断患者容量反应性。近年来将被动抬腿试验与其他血流动力学监测手段相结合,逐渐成为研究容量反应性的热点。

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 静脉胰岛素泵联合持续血糖监测系统对肝移植术后患者血糖控制的有效性及安全性:附 1 例报道

    目的 总结 1 例肝移植患者术后使用胰岛素泵联合持续血糖监测系统(CGMS)进行血糖控制的有效性及安全性。 方法 回顾性分析笔者所在医院科室于 2015 年 11 月收治的 1 例肝移植患者的临床资料,该患者术后使用胰岛素泵联合 CGMS 进行血糖控制。 结果 本例患者的血糖控制时间为 4 127 min。血糖控制参数:最大值 9.8 mmol/L,最小值 4.7 mmol/L(自觉无头晕、乏力等低血糖症状),平均 6.9 mmol/L,目标血糖达标时间为4 030 min,占 98%。血糖变异参数:标准差(SD )为 1.1 mmol/L,血糖不稳定指数为 7.32(mmol/L)2/(h·d),平均血糖波动幅度为 0,平均日内血糖改变为 3.4 mmol/L。控制期间营养情况:肠内营养的碳水化合物用量为 115 g,全胃肠外营养的碳水化合物用量为 516 g,胰岛素用量为 139 U(用量均值为 2 U/h),平均采样时间为 109 min。肝移植术后 3 周患者痊愈出院,术后 1 个月随访无不适,复查糖化血红蛋白为 4.9%。 结论 胰岛素泵联合 CGMS 的血糖控制效果较好,但该结论仍需要大样本、多中心及前瞻性的随机对照试验给予证实。

    Release date:2017-10-17 01:39 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Randomized Controlled Trial of Preoperatively Combinative Assessment of Transrectal Ultrasound and Serum Amyloid A Protein in Middle and Lower Rectal Cancer for Surgical Decision Making

    Objective To determine the influence of combinative assessment of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and serum amyloid A protein (SAA) on the assessment of preoperative staging selection of operative procedures in the middle and lower rectal cancer. Methods Prospectively enrolled 130 patients, who diagnosed definitely as middle and lower rectal cancer at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from June 2008 to February 2009 were randomly assigned into two groups with 65 participants, respectively. In one group named TRUS combined SAA group, both TRUS and SAA combinative assessment were made for the preoperative evaluation. In another group named TRUS group, only the preoperative TRUS was made. The preoperative staging and predicted operative procedures were compared with postoperative pathologic staging and practical operation program, respectively.Results Of 118 patients with rectal cancer were actually included into TRUS combined SAA group (n=59) and TRUS group (n=59). The baselines of characteristics of two groups were basically identical. For TRUS combined SAA group, the accuracies of preoperative T and N staging were 79.7% (47/59) and 77.8% (42/54) respectively; For TRUS group the corresponding rates were 86.4% (51/59) and 57.7% (30/52), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference of the accuracy of preoperative T staging (P=0.609) while preoperative N staging had statistical difference (P=0.027) between two groups. There was a statistically significant difference of the accuracy of prediction to operative procedures in two groups 〔96.6% (57/59) vs. 83.1% (49/59), P=0.015〕. The preoperative T staging was related to the selection of operative procedures (P=0.037) when analyzing the relationship between the operative procedures and the multiple clinicopathological factors in middle and lower rectal cancer. ConclusionCombinative assessment of TRUS and SAA could improve the accuracy of preoperative staging in middle and lower rectal cancer, thus provide higher predictive coincidence rate to operative procedures for surgeon.

    Release date:2016-09-08 10:58 Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content