Objective To summarize the experience of single incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery and to discuss the operative techniques. Methods The clinical data of 21 cases who underwent single incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery in Shengjing Hospital from Jan. 2010 to Jun. 2011 were collected and analyzed. Results Of 21 cases underwent single incision laparoscopic surgery， right hemicolectomy performed in 5 cases， sigmoidectomy performed in 2 cases， rectal anterior resection performed in 9 cases， rectal abdominoperineal resection performed in 2 cases， total colectomy performed in 1 case， and colostomy performed in 2 cases. Twenty cases completed by single incision， but 1 case was added an extra 12 mm incision in order to dissect the lower segment of rectum. The operative time was （189±75） min （40-335min）；the postoperative hospitalization time was （11.5±3.4） d （7-16d）. There were no bleeding， anastomosis leakage or intestinal obstruction after operation， and no incision infection， rupture or hernia were founded. No recurrence was found within 6 months’ follow up after operation. Conclusions Under reasonable selection of indication， single incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery is safe and feasible， and it also has a satisfactory cosmetic effect and better minimally invasive effect.
ObjectiveTo compare clinical outcome between single-incision laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy (SILSG) versus laparoscopy-assisted subtotal gastrectomy (LASG) in treatment of benign gastric ulcer and duodenal ulcer. MethodsClinical data of 37 patients with benign gastric ulcer or duodenal ulcer who underwent laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy between Jan. 2008 and Feb. 2015 at Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University was collected retrospectively. Among them, 15 patients underwent SILSG and 22 patients underwent LASG. Demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative data was analyzed and compared between the 2 groups. ResultsThe operative time of SILSG group was significantly longer than that of LASG group (P < 0.050). However, the postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter (P < 0.050), and the total patient scar assesment scale (PSAS) score was significantly lower (P < 0.050) in the SILSG group than those of LASG group. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups with respect to other variables (P > 0.050), such as conversion rate, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative exhaust time, incidence of complication, and visual analog scale score of pain. All patients received postoperative follow up, and the period ranged from 6 months to 25 months, with a median of 11 months. During the follow up period, no one suffered from incision hernia and recurrence of ulcer. ConclusionCompared with LASG, SILSG is a technically feasible procedure with better cosmesis and equivalent curability.