west china medical publishers
Author
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Author "陈理国" 2 results
  • A Clinical Study on Tauro Ursodeoxycholic Acid for the Relapse of Cholelithiasis after Gallbladder-Protected Lithotomy

    Objective To evaluate the clinical application value of the tauro ursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA) for preventing the relapse of lithiasis after the gallbladder-protected lithotomy. Methods Totally 80 cholecyslithiasis patients in Chengdu General Military Hospital who met the demand of lithotomy in protecting gallbladder were divided into two groups by random permutations, with 40 patients in each. The calculus was removed by using the percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy in order to preserve the well-functioning gallbladder. The patients in the trial group were given TUDCA after surgery for two years, whereas the patients in the control group received the same nursing and diet therapies without medication. The thickness of gallbladder wall and the contraction function of gallbladder were checked two years after surgery, the statistics of the recurrence rate of liary calculus symptoms and cholecyslithiasis were conducted, and the comparison between those two groups was performed. Results All the operations of gallbladder-protected lithotomy were successful. There was significant difference between those two groups two years after surgery in terms of the thickness of gallbladder wall and the contraction function of gallbladder (Plt;0.05). The relapse of lithiasis was remarkably decreased in the trial group (Plt;0.05). Conclusion The application of TUDCA for patients with gallbladder-protected lithotomy can prevent the relapse of cholecyslithiasis.

    Release date:2016-09-07 11:06 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Comparative Analysis Between Laparoscopic Microinvasion Gallbladder-Preserving Lithotomy and Laparoscopic Cholecystolithotomy

    目的 探讨腹腔镜下联合胆道镜微创保胆取石术治疗胆囊结石的疗效。方法 解放军第452医院普外科2005年1月至2010年1月期间行腹腔镜保胆取石术治疗胆囊结石患者70例,与同期行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者对比,观察2组的手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间、住院费用及术后饮食恢复时间。结果 在术中出血量及术后饮食恢复时间上,保胆取石组明显少于或短于胆囊切除组(P<0.05);在手术时间、术后住院时间及住院费用上2组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 相比胆囊切除术,腹腔镜联合胆道镜保胆取石术创伤较小且恢复较快,但是保胆取石术后结石的复发有待长期观察和研究。

    Release date:2016-09-08 10:38 Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content