Objective To summarize the research progress in antitumor mechanism of non-steroidal anti-inflam-matory drugs. Methods The domestic and international published literatures about antitumor mechanism of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in recent years were reviewed. Results The antitumor mechanism of non-steroidal anti-inflam-matory drugs was multistrata and multidigit. Conclusion Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs can be used to prevent the development of colorectal cancer and also be a adjuvant therapy after radical operation for colorectal cancer.
Objective To improve the knowledge of epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment of aspirin induced asthma ( AIA) in China. Methods Thirty-six cases with AIA who were reported in 30 papers in recent 10 years were analyzed retrospectively. Results The drugs which induced AIA in China mainly included acetylsalicylic acid ( aspirin) , ibuprofen ( Fenbid, ibuprofen) , while acetaminophen ( paracetamol,Bufferin, Tylenol ) , phenylpropanoid thiazide ( Piroxicam) , methoxy-naphthalene C acid ( naproxen) ,diclofenac in rare cases. 28. 6% ( 8 /28) of AIA patients were complicated with nasal disease . AIA could occur at all ages, especially for those over 40 years ( 72. 2% , 26 /36) . No significant difference of prevalencein male and female. The onset time of AIA was less than 60min in 71. 4% and gt;120min in 38. 6% . Most patients took the medications by oral ( 83. 3% ,30/36) , but the AIA onset time was not different by different administration route. Conclusions The incidence of AIA increases in recent years because of widely use of NSAIDs. However, no awareness of NSAIDs induced asthma is common in patients and physicians. For asthma patients it must be caution to take antipyretic analgesic anti-inflammatory drugs. If necessary,methoxy-naphthalene C acid ( naproxen) and diclofenac could be better choice.
Objective To assess the effect of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for the prevention of colorectal neoplasia. Methods A systematic review of all relevant randomized controlled trials and quasi-randomized controlled trials of NSAIDs for prevention of colorectal neoplasms was performed by using The Cochrane Collaboration recommended methods. Results Nine trials were included and assessed. There was sufficient evidence for aspirin to prevent the development of colorectal adenomas compared with placebo in three trials of high quality and large sample size with relative risk (RR) 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72 to 0.91 and P=0.000 5 . No adequate evidence supported aspirin in the prevention of development of colorectal cancer (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.20, P= 0.79). However, there was no evidence to support sulindac and celecoxib curing or preventing colorectal adenomas or familial adenomatous polyposis (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.03, P= 0.07 and RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.07, P=0.23). No evidence on the dose of NSAIDs was used for prevention of colorectal adenomas at present. No significant difference was seen in the number of adverse events between patients taking NSAIDs and those taking placebo (P=0.9). Conclusions Aspirin may prevent the development of colorectal adenomas and may avoid polypectomy for 1 in every 10 to 18 persons but we don’t know whether aspirin can be substituted for endoscopically removed colorectal polyps. However, the true clinical benefit for prevention of colorectal neoplasia of NSAIDs should be considered.
Objective To investigate the medication advancement of gastrointestinal polyposis in patients with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS). Methods Literatures about the medication advancement on gastrointestinal polyposis of PJS were reviewed and analyzed. The recent development of targeting drugs, especially the data of cyclooxygenase-2 selective inhibitors and rapamycin, were emphatically summarized. Results With the deep investigation of PJS and application of selective drugs, the medication of gastrointestinal polyposis in cases of PJS has got more advancement. The extensive use of synthetic cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors and rapamycin in clinic developed a new way to treat gastrointestinal polyposis of PJS. Conclusion The cyclooxygenase-2 selective inhibitors and rapamycin have the following features: noninvasive, high selectivity and good curative effects. They have splendid prospects in the clinical treatment of gastrointestinal polyposis in patients with PJS and are bring the treatment of gastrointestinal polyposis in cases of PJS into a targeting therapy phase.
ObjectiveTo observe the efficacy and safety of etofenamate gel (foscavir+tramadoli hydrochloridum+gabapentin) in the treatment of acute herpes zoster. MethodsForty patients with acute herpes zoster neuralgia treated between January 2013 and June 2014 were randomly divided into two groups:control group and treatment group, with 20 in each. The patients had a visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score of seven or higher. Patients in the control group accepted conventional treatment, while those in the treatment group were treated with conventional treatment combined with etofenamate gel. Two weeks after treatment, VAS score, quality of life and sleep score, and the degree of improvement in skin paresthesia were evaluated and compared between the two groups. ResultsThe VAS score decreased significantly in both the two groups after treatment (P < 0.05), and the decrease in the treatment group was significantly more obvious (P < 0.05). The quality of life, sleep score and the degree of improvement in skin paresthesia were ameliorated significantly after treatment (P < 0.05), and the amelioration in the treatment group was significantly greater (P < 0.05). ConclusionThe early application of Ordofen can strengthen analgesia effect of the conventional treatment, improve the quality of life and sleep, and reduce skin paresthesia.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the risk factors for intestinal injury induced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs(NSAIDs).MethodsWe comprehensively searched WanFang Data, CNKI, Web of Science, EBSCO, PubMed and The Cochrane Library databases to collect studies on risk factors of NSAIDs-induced intestinal injury. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed risk of bias, and then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.2 and STATA 12.0 software.ResultsA total of 6 case-control studies were included, in which 265 patients were in the case group and 301 patients in the control group. The results of meta-analysis showed that PPI was an independent risk factor for NSAIDs-induced intestinal injury (OR=1.59, 95%CI 1.07 to 2.35, P=0.02). In addition, patients with osteoarthritis (OR=2.44, 95% CI 1.11 to 5.36, P=0.03) or rheumatoid arthritis (OR=3.04, 95% CI 1.31 to 7.03, P=0.01) was associated with intestinal mucosal injury induced by NSAIDs. Gender, age, smoking history, drinking history, H2RA and rebamipide medication history, cardiovascular disease and cerebrovascular disease were not associated with intestinal injury.ConclusionsPPI is an independent risk factor for NSAIDs-induced intestinal injury. However, studies with high-quality, larger sample size are required to further verify that PPI increases the prevalence of intestinal injury.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on tennis elbow.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, VIP, CNKI and WanFang Data databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on NSAIDs for tennis elbow from inception to May 2019. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies, then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 8 RCTs involving 595 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that there were no significant differences in the therapeutic effect between NSAIDs and the placebo group (RR=1.10, 95%CI 0.89 to 1.35, P=0.39) or non-placebo control group (RR=0.88, 95%CI 0.77 to 1.00, P=0.06). Compared with non-placebo control group, NSAIDs group had lower VAS score difference (MD=−1.41, 95%CI −2.28 to −0.53, P=0.002).ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that the effect of NSAIDs on tennis elbow is still uncertain. The improvement of symptoms with NSAIDs may be superior to placebo, but inferior to other treatment methods. Due to the limited quantity and quality of included studies, the above conclusions are required to be verified by more high-quality studies.