Objective To summarize the development of gallbladder carcinoma related resistance genes and targeted therapy. Methods Domestic and international publications online involving resistance genes and targeted therapy of gallbladder carcinoma in recent years were collected and reviewed. Results Recent studies had shown that chemotherapy drug resistance of gallbladder carcinoma mainly involved lysosome protein transmembrane β4 （LAPTM4B） gene， NF-E2-related factor 2 （Nrf2） gene， and cancer stem cells （CSCs）. While the latest gene targets of treatment for gallbladder carcinoma mainly involved LAPTM4B， Nemo-like kinase （NLK）， tissue factor way inhibitor-2 （TFPI-2）， vascular endothelial growth factor-D （VEGF-D）， epidermal growth factor receptor （EGFR）， and melanoma differentiation-associated gene 7/interleukin 24 （mda-7/IL-24） gene. Conclusion The research involving resistance genes and targeted therapy of gallbladder carcinoma has make a certain progress， which broaden the concept of traditional treatment of gallbladder carcinoma.
Objective To review the research progress of the treatment of osteosarcoma, and to thoroughly understand its current state of research and prospect so as to lay a sol id foundation for the cl inical treatment. Methods The cl inical and experimental research l iteratures about treatment of osteosarcoma were extensively reviewed and analyzed. Results The present treatment of osteosarcoma is still need to comprehensive therapy which combine chemotherapy and surgical treatment. There are some progresses in gene therapy and molecular targeting therapy which can improve survival rate. Furthermore, well-designed studies and cl inical trials are needed to evaluate the potential therapeutic impact before they are used in cl inical. Conclusion Advancement in chemotherapeutic regimens has improved survival and l imb-sparing surgery in the treatment of osteosarcoma, but the progress of gene therapy and molecular targeting therapy gives new hope for osteosarcoma patients.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents for advanced renal cell carcinoma. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBMdisc and China Academic Periodical database from the establishment of each database to April 2009. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated anti-VEGF agents (sunitinib, sorafenib and bevacizumab). The quality of the included trials was evaluated by two reviewers independently. Meta-analyses were conducted by the Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 4.2 software. Results Four RCTs involving 2 320 patients were identified. According to the different interventions for advanced renal cell carcinoma, we divided the patients into two groups: anti-VEGF agents monotherapy and anti-VEGF agents plus interferon combination treatment. Our meta-analyses showed: monotherapy was superior to interferon on inhibition of tumor progression [OR=0.38, 95%CI (0.29, 0.51), Plt;0.01] and control of tumor [OR=2.53, 95%CI (1.87, 3.43), Plt;0.01], but was not significantly different from interferon on the overall effective rate [OR=1.97, 95%CI (0.20, 19.57), P=0.56] and serious side effects [OR=1.98, 95%CI (0.90, 4.34), P=0.09]. There were significant differences between anti-VEGF agents plus interferon and interferon alone on inhibition of tumor progression [OR=0.67, 95%CI (0.53, 0.84), P=0.000 5], overall effective rate [OR=2.65, 95%CI (1.94, 3.61), Plt;0.01], control of tumor [OR=2.14, 95%CI (1.65, 2.78), Plt;0.01] and serious side effects [OR=2.63, 95%CI (2.09, 3.31), Plt;0.01]. Conclusion Compared with interferon, anti-VEGF agents could inhibit tumor progression more effectively. Moreover, the combination therapy with interferon could offer a more favorable overall effective rate for advanced renal cell carcinoma, but then followed by more serious side effects. We need to weigh the merits and demerits of drugs before making a clinical decision for advanced renal cell carcinoma.