west china medical publishers
Author
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Author "韩巍" 3 results
  • APPLICATION OF ACETABULUM REINFORCEMENT RING FOR RECONSTRUCTING ACETABULAR DEFECTS IN ARTIFICIAL HIP REPLACEMENT

    Objective To study the operative methods and therapeutic effects of acetabulum reinforcement ring in the reconstruction of acetabular defects in primary and revisional artificial hip replacement. Methods From November 2000 to July 2005, 14 cases (15 hips) of severe acetabular defects in artificial hip replacement were treated with acetabulum reinforcement ring combined autogenous or allogenic bone transplantation, including 7 males and 8 females aged 34-72 years with an average of 55 years. Among them, 9 cases (9 hips) underwent artificial hip joint revision, which was 3-22 years (average8.9 years) far away from their primary replacement, and 5 cases (6 hi ps) received primary replacement, including 1 case of rheumatoid arthritis of both hips, 1 osteoarthritis caused by acetabular dysplasia, 1 femoral head resection due to debridement of hi p infection, 1 nonunion of acetabulum old fracture with the center dislocation of femoral head and 1 old acetabulum fracture. The disease course was 2-25 years (average 11.6 years). According to the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) classification, the acetabulum defects of 7 hips were categorized into Type II, 6 hips were Type III and 2 hips were Type IV. Harris score was (59.1 ± 15.4) points preoperatively. Results All wounds were healed by first intention. The symptom of sciatic nerve simulation was occurred in 1 case and was rel ieved after taking neuroprotective drug for 5 months. All the cases were followed up for 33-90 months (average 51.3 months). Harris score at the final follow-up was (81.9 ± 10.4) points, indicating there was a significant difference between before and after operation (P lt; 0.01). X-ray film demonstrated that the displacement of acetabulum reinforcement ring and acetabular cup was less than 5 mm, the rotation was less than 5°, and there was no progressive radiolucent zone around acetabulum and screw. Conclusion Acetabulum reinforcement ring is beneficial to reconstruct severe acetabular defects, improve hip joints’ function and provide primary stabil ity for putting acetabular cup into an ideal biomechanical position.

    Release date:2016-09-01 09:05 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 内置固定架治疗骨盆骨折致股神经麻痹三例

    目的总结皮下前环内置固定架(INFIX)治疗骨盆骨折致股神经麻痹的原因及处理方法。 方法回顾2013年4月-2015年1月经INFIX方法治疗后发生股神经麻痹的3例骨盆骨折患者临床资料。其中女2例,男1例;年龄分别为26、19、51岁;均为交通事故致伤。INFIX方法治疗后出现股神经麻痹症状,经影像学、神经电生理及彩色超声多普勒检查确诊。待骨折愈合后,二次手术取出内固定物,并联合营养神经治疗;其中2例行股神经松解。 结果患者分别获随访12、22、15个月,股四头肌肌力恢复至4级,可负重行走伴跛行。 结论INFIX治疗骨盆骨折时,如螺钉植入过深、连杆安放层次错误、连杆折弯不充分均可能导致股神经麻痹。对症处理后仍存在股四头肌力量弱以及步态改变。

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Orthopedic robot based on 5G technology for remote navigation of percutaneous screw fixation in pelvic and acetabular fractures

    Objective To investigate the accuracy and safety of percutaneous screw fixation for pelvic and acetabular fractures with remote navigation of orthopedic robot based on 5G technology. Methods Between January 2021 and December 2021, 15 patients with pelvic and/or acetabular fractures were treated with percutaneous screws fixation which were placed by remote navigation of orthopedic robot based on 5G technology. There were 8 males and 7 females. The age ranged from 20 to 98 years, with an average of 52.1 years. The causes of trauma included traffic accident injury in 6 cases, falling from height injury in 6 cases, fall injury in 2 cases, and heavy object smashing injury in 1 case. The time from injury to operation ranged from 3 to 32 days, with an average of 10.9 days. There were 8 cases of simple pelvic fractures, 2 simple acetabular fractures, and 5 both pelvic and acetabular fractures. There were 7 cases of pelvic fractures of Tile type B2, 2 type B3, 1 type C1, and 3 type C2; 4 cases of unilateral anterior column fracture of the acetabulum, 2 bilateral anterior column fractures, and 1 anterior wall fracture. CT images within 5 days after operation were collected for screw position assessment. The screw planning time and guidewire placement time were recorded, as well as the presence of intraoperative adverse events and complications within 5 days after operation. Results All patients achieved satisfactory surgical results. A total of 36 percutaneous screws were inserted (20 sacroiliac screws, 6 LC Ⅱ screws, 9 anterior column screws, and 1 acetabular apical screw). In terms of screw position evaluation, 32 screws (88.89%) were excellent and 4 screws (11.11%) were good; there was no screw penetrating cortical bone. The screw planning time ranged from 4 to 15 minutes, with an average of 8.7 minutes. The guidewire placement time ranged from 3 to 10 minutes, with an average of 6.8 minutes. The communication delayed in 2 cases, but the operation progress was not affected, and no serious intraoperative adverse events occurred. No delayed vascular or nerve injury, infection, or other complications occurred within 5 days after operation. No cases need surgical revision. ConclusionThe fixation of pelvic and acetabular fractures by percutaneous screw with remote navigation of orthopedic robot based on 5G technology is accurate, safe, and reliable.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content