目的:探讨早期护理干预对颈椎前路手术患者康复的影响。方法:选择颈椎前路手术患者66 例。分为实验组33例和对照组33例,实验组实施系统的早期护理干预活动指导,对照组进行常规护理,比较两组术后卧床时间、住院天数、术后并发症及术后生活质量。结果:实验组卧床时间及住院天数、术后并发症发生率均低于对照组 (Plt;0.05), 生活质量优于对照组 (Plt;0.05)。结论:早期护理干预有利于颈椎前路手术患者术后恢复
目的:探讨CCRS拉钩在颈椎前路手术中的应用方法及结果。方法:回顾分析2007~2008年在我院完成的97例颈椎前路手术中,应用CCRS拉钩来显露切口者的临床资料,并观察平均手术时间、术中出血量、周围软组织突入手术野的次数、术者术中调整撑开器的次数、患者术后咽部不适时间和医生满意度等指标。结果:该组病例平均手术时间103min,平均术中出血量110 mL,每台次软组织突入术野的次数为0~2次,术者术中调整CCRS 1~2次,患者术后咽部不适1~4 d,医生满意度为95.88%。结论:CCRS拉钩撑开切口后颈前方显露清晰,避免了周围软组织突入颈前操作区,从而提高了手术安全性和术者满意度。
With the continuous deepening of the practice related to the concept of enhanced recovery after surgery, patients with cervical spondylosis have higher expectations and requirements for postoperative rehabilitation. In order to improve the rehabilitation of patients with cervical spondylosis, and increase patient satisfaction, the orthopedics team of West China Hospital of Sichuan University has formulated a program for early ambulation after anterior cervical spine surgery based on the concept of enhanced recovery after surgery. This article introduces the program from the definition, background, feasibility, significance, and specific content of early ambulation for patients undergoing anterior cervical spine surgery, and aims to provide experience and reference for future clinical practice.
Objective To investigate the microscope-assisted anterior cervical surgery and traditional open surgery for the treatment of cervical myelopathy with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Methods Retrospective selection of patients with OPLL who underwent microscope-assisted and traditional open anterior cervical surgery in West China (Airport) Hospital Sichuan University were selected between January 2016 and August 2020. The patients who underwent traditional open anterior cervical surgery between January 2016 and August 2018 were classified as the conventional group, and the patients who underwent microscope-assisted anterior cervical surgery between September 2018 and August 2020 were classified as the microscope group. The baseline characteristics, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of pain before and after surgery, and surgical complications were collected. Neurological function was assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score. Result A total of 46 patients were included. There were 24 cases in the conventional group and 22 cases in the microscope group. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss and length of hospital stay in the microscope group were lower than those in the conventional group (P<0.001). There was no significant difference in VSA score and JOA score between the two groups before operation (P>0.05). There were statistically significant differences in VAS score and JOA score between the two groups 18 months after operation (P<0.001). The comparison of VAS score and JOA score in the two groups before and after operation showed that there was a statistically significant difference between 18 months after operation and before operation (P<0.05). In the microscope group, the average improvement rate of neurological function [(79.90±16.67)% vs. (58.12±17.47)%, t=4.317, P<0.001], excellent and good rate [95.45% (21/22) vs. 66.67% (16/24), χ2=4.354, P=0.037] were higher than those in the conventional group. The total number of complications in the microscope group was lower than that in the conventional group (P=0.024). Conclusion Compared with the traditional open anterior cervical surgery, the microscope-assisted anterior cervical surgery for OPLL can reduce intraoperative blood loss and length of hospital stay, reduce the incidence of postoperative complications.
Objective To establish the mode of anterior cervical surgery in outpatient setting, and evaluate its preliminary effectiveness. Methods A clinical data of patients who underwent anterior cervical surgery between January 2022 and September 2022 and met the selection criteria was retrospectively analyzed. The surgeries were performed in outpatient setting (n=35, outpatient setting group) or in inpatient setting (n=35, inpatient setting group). There was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05) in age, gender, body mass index, smoking, history of alcohol drinking, disease type, the number of surgical levels, operation mode, as well as preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, visual analogue scale score of neck pain (VAS-neck), and visual analogue scale score of upper limb pain (VAS-arm). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, total hospital stay, postoperative hospital stay, and hospital expenses of the two groups were recorded; JOA score, VAS-neck score, and VAS-arm score were recorded before and immediately after operation, and the differences of the above indexes between pre- and post-operation were calculated. Before discharge, the patient was asked to score satisfaction with a score of 1-10. Results The total hospital stay, postoperative hospital stay, and hospital expenses were significantly lower in the outpatient setting group than in the inpatient setting group (P<0.05). The satisfaction of patients was significantly higher in the outpatient setting group than in the inpatient setting group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in operation time and intraoperative blood loss (P>0.05). The JOA score, VAS-neck score, and VAS-arm score of the two groups significantly improved at immediate after operation when compared with those before operation (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the improvement of the above scores between the two groups (P>0.05). The patients were followed up (6.67±1.04) months in the outpatient setting group and (5.95±1.90) months in the inpatient setting group, with no significant difference (t=0.089, P=0.929). No surgical complications, such as delayed hematoma, delayed infection, delayed neurological damage, and esophageal fistula, occurred in the two groups. Conclusion The safety and efficiency of anterior cervical surgery performed in outpatient setting were comparable to that performed in inpatient setting. Outpatient surgery mode can significantly shorten the postoperative hospital stay, reduce hospital expenses, and improve the patients’ medical experience. The key points of the outpatient mode of anterior cervical surgery are minimizing damage, complete hemostasis, no drainage placement, and fine perioperative management.
Objective To investigate the effect of ultrasonic bone curette in anterior cervical spine surgery. MethodsA clinical data of 63 patients with cervical spondylosis who were admitted between September 2019 and June 2021 and met the selection criteria was retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 32 cases were operated with conventional instruments (group A) and 31 cases with ultrasonic bone curette (group B). There was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05) in gender, age, surgical procedure, surgical segment and number of occupied cervical space, disease type and duration, comorbidities, and preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, cervical dysfunction index (NDI), and pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score. The operation time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative drainage, postoperative hospital stay, and the occurrence of postoperative complications were recorded in both groups. Before operation and at 1, 3, and 6 months after operation, the JOA score and NDI were used to evaluate the function and the postoperative JOA improvement rate was calculated, and VAS score was used to evaluate the pain improvement. The anteroposterior and lateral cervical X-ray films were taken at 1, 3, and 6 months after operation to observe whether there was any significant loosening and displacement of internal fixators. ResultsCompared with group A, group B had shorter operation time and postoperative hospital stay, less intraoperative bleeding and postoperative drainage, and the differences were significant (P<0.05). All incisions healed by first intention in the two groups, and postoperative complications occurred in 5 cases (15.6%) in group A and 2 cases (6.5%) in group B, showing no significant difference (P>0.05). All patients were followed up 6-12 months (mean, 7.9 months). The JOA score and improvement rate gradually increased in groups A and B after operation, while the VAS score and NDI gradually decreased. There was no significant difference in VAS score between 3 months and 1 month in group B (P>0.05), and there were significant differences between the other time points of each indicator in the two groups (P<0.05). At 1, 3, and 6 months after operation, the JOA score and improvement rate in group B were better than those in group A (P<0.05). X-ray films examination showed that there was no screw loosening or titanium plate displacement in the two groups after operation, and the intervertebral cage or titanium mesh significantly sank. ConclusionCompared with traditional instruments, the use of ultrasonic bone curette assisted osteotomy in anterior cervical spine surgery has the advantages of shorter operation time, less intraoperative bleeding, less postoperative drainage, and shorter hospital stay.