Objective To observe the short-term effect and safety of hyperbaric oxygen combined with edaravone and ozagrel sodium in treating progressive cerebral infarction. Methods A total of 65 in-patients with acute progressive cerebral infarction were randomly divided into two groups: 33 in-patients in the trial group were treated by hyperbaric oxygen combined with edaravone and ozagrel sodium, while the other 32 in-patients in the control group were treated by edaravone and ozagrel sodium. The course of treatment was 14 days. The following indications were assessed before and after the treatment respectively: the national institutes of health stroke scale (NIHSS), activities of daily living (ADL), and clinical effects. Results This study showed that the scores of both ADL and NIHSS in the trial group were higher than those in the control group, with significant differences (Plt;0.05). The clinical effective rate of the trial group was 90.91% which was obviously higher than the control group with a significant difference (P=0.028). There were no obvious adverse reactions in both groups. Conclusion Hyperbaric oxygen combined with both edaravone and ozagrel sodium is notable in short-term effect and safe, thus it is worth being popularized in clinical treatment.
Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of hyperbaric oxygen treatment for patients with post-stroke depression. Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about hyperbaric oxygen treatment with placebo or open control in patients with post-stroke depression were comprehensively retrieved in PubMed (1966 to 2012.12), EMbase (1974 to 2012.12), EBSCO (1965 to 2012.12), CENTRAL (2012.11), CBM (1978 to 2012.12), CNKI (1980 to 2012.12), and VIP (1989 to 2012.12). References of the included articles were also retrieved. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the quality of the included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.0. Results Twelve trials involving 822 patients were included, all of which were randomized non-placebo controlled trials. The results of meta-analysis of 12 trials (n=822) showed, the improvement of depression symptoms in the HBO group was better than that in the control group (MD=4.82, 95%CI 3.12 to 6.52). However, funnel plot showed that publication bias was large. After removing three trials for sensitive analysis, the results showed that the improvement of depression symptoms in the HBO group was still better than that in the control group (MD=3.91, 95%CI 3.35 to 4.47). Adverse events were reported in 2 trials, including dizziness, palpitation, mild earache, tinnitus, etc. However, no severe adverse events occurred. Conclusion Current evidence indicates that, HBO can effectively reduce the score of HAMD and no serious adverse reactions occurred. It’s necessary to further carry out high quality randomized controlled trials with large sample size due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, so as to assess its effectiveness and safety.
Object To collect and summarize high quality clinical evidence on the use of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) in health care generally. Method We searched MEDLINE (1980-2006), The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2006) and the China Biomedicine Database (1982-2006) for systematic reviews, meta-analyses and randomized controlled trials. The quality of included studies was critically evaluated. Result Thirteen systematic reviews (12 Cochrane reviews) on HBO were included. Results showed that HBO had some beneficial effect on acute coronary syndrome, ischemic stroke, multiple sclerosis, malignant otitis externa, idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss and tinnitus. It might also promote chronic wound healing and relieve radiation damage.Conclusions Since the avaliable randomized controlled trials for the systematic reviews we included are too small, further well-designed multicentre large-scale trials are needed to determine the efficacy and safety of HBO .
目的:观察依达拉奉联合高压氧治疗脑梗死的疗效。方法:50例脑梗死随机分成2组，对照组25例采用依达拉奉治疗30 mg，静脉滴注2次/d，疗程14 d，观察组采用依达拉奉治疗的同时给予高压氧治疗，14 d后评定疗效。结果:观察组和对照组的有效率分别是96%和88%，对照组与观察组比较Plt;0.05，差异有统计学意义。结论:依达拉奉联合高压氧治疗脑梗死是一种更有效的治疗方法，值得推广。
Forty white rats, randomly equally divided into experimental and control groups, were used in this study. Sodium amytal was injected intraperitoneally, a crushing injury of the sciatic nerve was created in all of the 80 rats. The forty rats in the experimental group were treated with hyperbaric oxygenation while those rats in the control group received no treatement. From 2-8 weeks following the crushing injury of the sciatic nerves, it was observed that the treatment group showed an earlier recovery of nerve function and carlier response of leg muscles to electristimulation; less edema and exudation; marked proliferation of Schwann’s cells and more rapid recoveryof neurilemma, lastly. the number and rate of regeneration of neural axons were higher than that the control group.