ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of probiotics for prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).MethodsThe Web of Science, Pubmed, OVID, Cochrane Library, CNKI, EMbase, Sciencedirect, Chinese biomedical database, and Wanfang database before August 2017 were searched, and the relevant data resources were also searched by hand to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of probiotics for prevention of VAP. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using a modified version of the Jadad scale. Meta-analysis was performed with RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 16 RCTs were included. The use of probiotics can reduce the incidence of VAP [RR=0.71, 95%CI (0.62, 0.80), P<0.000 01], ICU days [MD=–3.28, 95%CI (–6.15, –0.41), P=0.03] and total duration of antibiotics [MD=–2.47, 95%CI (–4.89, –0.04), P=0.05], but can not reduce the mortality of ICU [RR=0.99, 95%CI (0.74, 1.32), P=0.94], hospital mortality [RR=0.77, 95%CI (0.58, 1.01), P=0.06], 28-day mortality [RR=1.01, 95%CI (0.69, 1.47), P=0.97], 90-day mortality [RR=1.00, 95%CI (0.72, 1.37), P=0.99], hospital stays [MD=–0.68, 95%CI (–3.88, 2.52), P=0.68], duration of mechanical ventilation [MD=–2.17, 95%CI (–4.78, 0.44), P=0.10], or the incidence of diarrhea [RR=0.96, 95%CI (0.80, 1.14), P=0.62]. No serious adverse events were reported in all included RCTs.ConclusionsThe use of probiotics can reduce the incidence of VAP, but it has no effect on the mortality, hospital stay, duration of mechanical ventilation or the incidence of diarrhea. However, considering the heterogeneity of research designs, we need more rigorous, large sample randomized controlled studies to increase the strength of evidence.
Objective To observe the microperimetry performance of macular function in pathologic myopia patients. Methods The clinical data of 90 patients (142 eyes) with pathologic myopia were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were asked in details about history, and take examinations of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), refractive dioptre, eye axis, fluorescent fundus angiography (FFA), indirect ophthalmoscopy and optical coherence tomography (OCT). According to the test results, patients were divided into non-pathological macular group (20 patients, 24 eyes) and pathological macular group (70 patients, 118 eyes). Retinal imaging and macular microperimetry were measure by MP-1 Microperimeter.The mean retinal sensitivities (MS) and fixation stability in the central 10deg;, fixation rate and fixation position in the central 2deg; and 4deg;were determined.Results The MS of pathological and non-pathological macular group were(16.39plusmn;2.12), (10.80plusmn;4.53) dB respectively, the difference was statistically significant(F=15.044,t=-9.314;P=0.000). Among 24 eyes of non-pathological macular group, fixation was stable in 19 eyes (79.17%), relative unstable in five eyes (20.83%); among 118 eyes of pathological macular group, fixation was stable in 45 eyes (38.14%), relative unstable in 52 eyes (44.07%), unstable in 21 eyes (17.79%), the difference was statistically significant(chi;2=13.56, P=0.000). The differences of 2 deg;and 4 deg;fixation rate between those two groups are statistically significant (F=5.773, 13.230; t=-4.110,-5.465;P=0.000) . Among 24 eyes of non-pathological macular group, center fixation occurred in 23 eyes (95.83%), weak center fixation occurred in one eye (4.17%); among 118 eyes of pathological macular group, fixation center occurred in 81 eyes (68.64%), weak center fixation occurred in 16 eyes (13.56%)，eccentric fixation occurred in 21 eyes (17.80%), the difference was statistically significant (F=9.618,t=-5.773；P=0.000).Conclusion Pathological myopia patients with pathological macular changes have decreased retinal sensitivity, decreased fixation stability and eccentric fixation points.