Objective To investigate the medication adherence to antihypertensives, antidiabetics, and lipid-lowering agents and its influence on the prognosis of individuals at high risk of stroke. Methods A total of 16892 residents aged 40 years or above in eight communities in Sichuan participated in a face-to-face study from May to September 2015. A database of a high-risk population of stroke in Sichuan province was established, and data were collected via using a standardized structured questionnaire by experienced investigators, including the treatment status and medication compliance of participants with hypertension, diabetes, or dyslipidemia during the follow-up period. Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to explore the influencing factors of medication adherence and its influence on the prognosis of individuals at high risk of stroke. Results A total of 2893 participants at high risk of stroke were enrolled. The treatment rates of hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia were 50.1%, 49.2%, and 5.1%, respectively, when the high-risk individuals were identified. At the end of follow-up (with a median follow-up period of 4.8 years), the treatment rates of hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia were 24.8%, 25.0%, and 7.9%, respectively. Medication adherence to antihypertensives, antidiabetics, and lipid-lowering agents were 27.8%, 25.5%, and 18.1%, respectively. Multiple logistic regression analyses showed that the education level of high school or above [odds ratio (OR)=2.134, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.098, 4.147), P=0.025], medical insurance for urban residents [OR=1.556, 95%CI (1.086, 2.230), P=0.016] and urban employees [OR=2.325, 95%CI (1.362, 3.967), P=0.002], having fewer children [OR=0.819, 95%CI (0.719, 0.933), P=0.003], and family history of stroke [OR=1.559, 95%CI (1.066, 2.282), P=0.022] were associated with greater adherence to antihypertensives; medical insurance for urban employees was associated with greater adherence to antidiabetics [OR=2.494, 95%CI (1.173, 5.300), P=0.018]. After adjusting for confounding factors, failure to regular use of antihypertensives [OR=2.617, 95%CI (1.414, 4.842), P=0.002], antidiabetics [OR=3.909, 95%CI (2.394, 6.380), P<0.001], and lipid-lowering agents [OR=4.828, 95%CI (2.581, 9.033), P<0.001] in patients with hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia, respectively were associated with increased risk of ischemic stroke during the follow-up period. Regular use of lipid-lowering agents in patients with dyslipidemia was associated with an increased risk of intracerebral hemorrhage during the follow-up [OR=4.371, 95%CI (1.156, 16.530), P=0.030]. Conclusions The prevalences of hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia are high in high-risk individuals of stroke in Sichuan province. However, the treatment rates are unsatisfactory, and the medication adherence is poor. The medication adherence is affected by a variety of demographic and socioeconomic factors. Regular treatments of hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia reduce the risk of ischemic stroke in individuals at high risk of stroke, but regular use of lipid-lowering agents in patients with dyslipidemia is associated with an increased risk of intracerebral hemorrhage during the follow-up.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the outcomes of drug-eluting balloon (DEB) in treating coronary artery in-stent restenosis (ISR) by using meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA). MethodsWe searched PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library（Issue 4, 2016）, CNKI, CBM, VIP and WanFang Data to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding the treatment of ISR by DEB from inception to April 2016. After two reviewers independently screened citations, extracted data and assessed the bias risk of included studies, we carried out meta-analysis and TSA analysis by using RevMan 5.3 version and TSA v0.9 respectively. ResultsA total of 10 RCTs involving 1909 patients were included. Seven-hundred and forty-seven patients were included with regard to the comparison between DEB and POBA, 1162 patients were recruited to compare DEB and drug-eluting stents (DES). The results of meta-analysis revealed that DEB was associated with decreased mortality (OR=0.36, 95%CI 0.14 to 0.93, P=0.04), compared with that of plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA). And TSA showed that cumulative Z-curve strode the conventional threshold value but not the TSA threshold value which suggested a false positive result of meta-analysis. In comparison with that of POBA, DEB had a lower incidence of target lesion revascularization (TLR) (OR=0.16, 95%CI 0.07 to 0.38, P＜0.01). And the result of TSA displayed that the cumulative Z-curve strode both the conventional and TSA threshold value which validated the result of meta-analysis. Besides, the results of meta-analysis showed that there were no significant differences in mortality (OR=0.84, 95%CI 0.41 to 1.72, P=0.63) and TLR (OR=1.55, 95%CI 0.76 to 3.16, P=0.22) between DEB and DES. However, the result of TSA revealed that the cumulative Z-curve did not strode both the conventional and TSA threshold value, and the included sample size less was than required information size which suggested that the reliability of the meta-analysis needed more studies to confirm. While the subgroup analysis of EES revealed that DEB had a higher incidence of TLR than that of DEB (OR=3.37, 95%CI 1.59 to 7.15, P＜0.01). And the result of TSA displayed that the cumulative Z-curve strode both the conventional and TSA threshold value which validated the result of meta-analysis. ConclusionCurrent evidence shows, EES is superior to DEB in decreasing the incidence of TLR in patients with ISR, while DEB is superior to POBA. However, the comparison of DEB and other strategies on reducing of mortality in patients with ISR still needed more studies to prove.