Objective To systematically review the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET dual time point scan in identifying benign and malignant lung lesions, in order to necessity and clinical value of dual time point scan. Methods We electronically searched PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, WanFang Data, CNKI and CBM for diagnostic tests on 18F-FDG PET dual time point scan vs. surgery or needle biopsy (gold standard) from January 1990 to November 2013. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of included studies. Then statistical analysis was performed to calculate pooled effect sizes of sensitivity (SEN) and specificity (SPE), and area under the curve (AUC) of summary receiver operating characteristics (SROC), followed by sensitive analysis and subgroup analysis. Results A total of 19 domestic and foreign studies were totally included, involving 1 225 lesions. The results of meta-analysis showed SEN 0.82 (95%CI 0.79 to 0.85) and SPE 0.74 (95%CI 0.71 to 0.78) regarding 18F-FDG PET dual time point scan in identifying benign and malignant lung lesions. The results of sensitive analysis showed that: a) after eliminating studies in which tuberculosis in the benign lesions accounted for more than 50%, it showed pooled SEN 0.81 (95%CI 0.77 to 0.84), pooled SPE 0.76 (95%CI 0.72 to 0.80), and AUC 0.850 3; b) after eliminating studies in which sample size was less than 50 cases, it showed pooled SEN 0.78 (95%CI 0.74 to 0.82), pooled SPE 0.78 (95%CI 0.74 to 0.82), and AUC 0.814 1; and c) after eliminating studies in which iSUV was more than 2.5, it showed pooled SEN 0.67 (95%CI 0.55 to 0.78), pooled SPE 0.66 (95%CI 0.54 to 0.77), and AUC 0.779 8. Conclusion 18F-FDG PET dual time point scan has intermediate value in identifying benign and malignant lung lesions, which is almost as good as single time point scan, so it’s unnecessary to apply it as a clinical routine test.
Objective To use meta-analysis method to assess the efficacy of fluorine-18fluorode-oxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) (18F-FDG-PET/CT) scan and 99Tcm-methylene diphosphonate (99Tcm-MDP) bone scan (BS) on early diagnosis of bone metastases of cancer. Methods Computer-based retrieval was conducted on MEDLINE, PubMed, EMbase, Ovid, and The Cochrane Library (from their establishment to 2010) to search reports about diagnosing bone metastases of cancer with 18FDG-PET/CT and 99Tcm-MDP Bone Scan. Three reviewers independently selected the studies according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, collected the data, and evaluated the quality. MetaDisc software was adopted to conduct meta-analyses. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated, the summary receiving operating characteristic (SROC) curve was drawn, and the areas under the curve (AUC) and Q were measured. Results Five studies were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that the pooled sensitivity of 18FDG-PET/CT and 99Tcm-MDP BS in the diagnosis of bone metastases was 0.95 (95%CI 0.90 to 0.97) and 0.77 (95%CI 0.71 to 0.83), respectively; the pooled specificity was 0.98 (95%CI 0.97 to 0.99) and 0.90 (95%CI 0.88 to 0.92), respectively; the pooled DOR was 602.81 (95%CI 214.07 to 1697.51) and 41.37 (95%CI 8.15 to 210.05), respectively; the AUC was 0.984 2 and 0.901 7, respectively; and the Q index was 0.945 4 and 0.833 1, respectively. Conclusion The 18F-FDG PET/CT is more effective than the 99Tcm-MDP bone scan in the early diagnosis of bone metastases in cancer.