ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) via radial access versus via femoral access for patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). MethodsRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) about the clinical efficacy and safety of radial access for PCI in patients with acute STEMI were searched in PubMed, EMbase, CBM, The Cochrane Library (Issue 6, 2014), CNKI, VIP, and WanFang Data from 2000 to November 2014. Literature screening according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, data extraction and methodological quality assessment of included studies were completed by two reviewers independently. Then meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.2 software. ResultsA total of fourteen RCTs involving 5 212 patients were enrolled. The results indicated that:a) radial access was associated with decreased risks of mortality (OR=0.54, 95%CI 0.40 to 0.74, P=0.000 1); decreased incidences of major bleeding (OR=0.50, 95%CI 0.34 to 0.74, P=0.000 8), major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (OR=0.65, 95%CI 0.50 to 0.83, P=0.000 6), and puncture site complications (OR=0.35, 95%CI 0.25 to 0.49, P < 0.000 01); and decreased hospital duration (MD=-2.14, 95%CI-3.97 to-0.31, P=0.002). b) However, the two groups were alike in the success rate of operation, exposure time of X ray, risk of stroke, and the rate of CABG. PCI via radial access took more operation time than that via femoral access, and PCI via radial access had a higher incidence of changing puncture access. ConclusionFor acute STEMI patients undergoing PCI, radial access could significantly reduce mortality, and incidences of major bleeding, MACE and puncture site complications. Therefore, under the conditions of strict indication control and increased operation skills, PCI via radial access is effective and safe in the treatment of acute STEMI. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more large-scale, multi-centre, high quality RCTs are needed to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo explore the predictive value of a simple prediction model for patients with acute myocardial infarction.MethodsClinical data of 280 patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in the Department of Emergence Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University from January 2019 to January 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into a death group (n=34) and a survival group (n=246).ResultsAge, heart rate, body mass index (BMI), global registry of acute coronary events (GRACE), thrombolysis in myocardial infarction trial (TIMI) score, blood urea nitrogen, serum cystatin C and D-dimer in the survival group were less or lower than those in the death group (P<0.05). Left ventricle ejection fraction and the level of albumin, triglyceride, total cholesterol and low density lipoprotein cholesterol were higher and the incidence of Killip class≥Ⅲ was lower in the survival group compared to the death group (P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age, BMI, heart rate, diastolic blood pressure, and systolic blood pressure were independent risk factors for all-cause death in STEMI patients. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that the area under the curve of simple prediction model for predicting death was 0.802, and similar to that of GRACE (0.816). The H-L test showed that the simple model had high accuracy in predicting death (χ2=3.77, P=0.877). Pearson correlation analysis showed that the simple prediction model was significantly correlated with the GRACE (r=0.651, P<0.001) and coronary artery stenosis score (r=0.210, P=0.001).ConclusionThe simple prediction model may be used to predict the hospitalization and long-term outcomes of STEMI patients, which is helpful to stratify high risk patients and to guide treatment.