Objective To analyze the clinical features and outcomes of pregnant women with acute diarrhea. Methods We collected the clinical data of 133 pregnant women with acute diarrhea (group A) admitted into Tangshan Maternal and Child Health Hospital and Kailuan General Hospital between June 2009 and June 2015. Another 100 acute diarrhea patients without pregnancy (group B) and 100 pregnant women without acute diarrhea (group C) were regarded as controls. All the patients’ medical history, symptoms and signs, laboratory examination results, diagnosis and treatment, termination of pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes were retrospectively analyzed. Results The average age of group A patients was (29.72±5.19) years old, and 83.46% of them came to hospital within 24 hours. There were significant differences in vomiting, abdominal pain, white blood cells, neutrophils, C-reactive protein, white blood cells in the feces, fibrinogen, prothrombin time, activated partial prothrombin time, thrombin time and the recovery time of the laboratory indicators between group A and group B (P<0.05). The neonatal weight of group A was lower than that of group C, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Regression analysis showed that hemoglobin and albumin had significant influence on acute diarrhea during pregnancy (P<0.05). Conclusion Pregnancy with acute diarrhea is a kind of severe obstetric complication, which may lead to adverse pregnancy.
Acute diarrhea has a high incidence in children. Pediatric tuina has been widely used in children with acute diarrhea in China. However, there is no guideline on the treatment of tuina for children with acute diarrhea. This guideline was developed following evidence-based principles and the World Health Organization handbook for guideline development. The linked systematic review was conducted following the Cochrane handbook. The quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations were evaluated using the GRADE approach. The reporting followed the RIGHT statement. Seven clinical questions (2 foreground questions and 5 background questions) were identified by literature review and expert consensus. Based on the linked systematic review and through comprehensive consideration of the balance of benefit and harm, quality of evidence, patient preferences, and other resources, we formulated the recommendations using Delphi expert consensus. We suggested combination of a weak recommendation for tuina with Western medicine usual care to treat children with acute diarrhea. This guideline can be used by clinicians and nurses in the department of traditional Chinese medicine pediatrics, and department of pediatric tuina, and can also be used as a reference for relevant clinicians of Western medicine and is also applicable to all institutions that practice tuina treatment.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of pediatric tuina in the treatment of children with acute diarrhea.MethodsCNKI, VIP, WanFang Data, CBM, PubMed and The Cochrane Library databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the treatment of children acute diarrhea with tuina from inception to November 20th, 2020. Two researchers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 15 RCTs involving 1 464 children were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that compared with Western medicine, tuina for children with acute diarrhea could increase the cure rate (RR=1.43, 95%CI 1.26 to 1.63, P<0.001), shorten the time for the frequency of diarrhea to return to normal (MD=−0.86, 95%CI −1.05 to −0.66, P<0.001) and the time for stool traits to return to normal (MD=−1.07, 95%CI −1.15 to −0.99, P<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between tuina and Western medicine (RR=0.25, 95%CI 0.03 to 2.23, P=0.22).ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that tuina has a superior effect on treating children with acute diarrhea, the incidence of adverse reactions is not increased. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify above conclusions.