west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "Acute promyelocytic leukemia" 2 results
  • Arsenic Trioxide for Incipient Stage Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia: A Meta-Analysis

    Objective To systematically review the effectiveness and safety of arsenic trioxide (ATO) versus retinoic acid for patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). Methods Such databases as PubMed, The Cochrane Library (Issue 12, 2012), CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP were electronically and comprehensively searched from inception to December 2012, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effectiveness and safety of ATO versus retinoic acid for patients with APL. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.0.2 software. Results Eight RCTs involving 586 cases of APL patients. The results of meta-analysis showed that, ATO and all-trans-retinoic (ATRA) were not statistically different in CR rates (OR=0.85, 95%CI 0.54 to 1.35, P=0.50), CR time (OR=–8.14, 95%CI –16.42 to 0.13, P=0.05), recurrence rates (OR=0.14, 95%CI 0.02 to 1.21, P=0.07), early mortality (OR=0.82, 95%CI 0.32 to 2.06, P=0.67), and five-year total survival rates (OR=1.19, 95%CI 0.54 to 2.60, P=0.66). ATO had lower incidences of adverse reaction such as hyperleukocytosis syndrome (OR=0.32, 95%CI 0.18 to 0.58, P=0.000 1) and retinoic acid syndrome (OR=0.05, 95%CI 0.02 to 0.14, Plt;0.000 01). Conclusion ATO and ATRA are alike in CR rates, CR time, recurrence rates, early mortality, and five-year total survival rates, but ATO causes less adverse reaction. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, ATO should be applied with caution according to patients’ conditions in clinic.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Effectiveness of Inductive Treatment with Arsenic Trioxide for Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia: A Systematic Review

    Objective To assess the clinical effectiveness and safety of inductive treatment with arsenic trioxide (As203) for acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified from MEDLINE (1966 -July, 2005 ), EMBASE (1984 -July, 2005 ), The Cochrane Library ( Issue 3, 2005) and CBM- disc (1978 -July, 2005). The references of eligible studies were handsearched. RCTs of As203 treating for APL were included. Data were evaluated and extracted by two reviewers independently with designed extraction form. RevMan 4. 2.7 software was used for data analysis. Results Six RCTs involving 323 patients were included. Two studies reported that there was no statistical difference between As2O3 group and all-transretinoic acid (ATRA) group in mortality for patients with APL or APL patients with complications of desseminated intiavascular coagulation or cerebra hemorrhage. The pooled result of 4 studies showed that there was no statistical difference with RR 0.98, 95 % CI 0.86 to 1.12 in complete remission (CR) rates between the two groups. The result of one study showed that the CR rate of patients with intravenous injection of As203 in 2 divided dosages with longer injection duration was higher with RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.12 compared with those with a single intravenous injection. Adverse effects in As2O3 group were less than ATRA group. Conclusions Inductive treatment with As2O3 for acute promyelocytic leukeuia has similar mortality and CR with less adverse effects compared with ATRA. More trials of high quality are required.

    Release date:2016-08-25 03:34 Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content