Objective To investigate the prevention of HBV reinfection in the perioperative period of liver transplantation on HBV-related diseases． Methods Published papers were collected and reviewed． Results HBV-related diseases were the main indications of liver transplantation．The prevention for HBV reinfection affects the survivals remarkably. Nowadays, a lot of medication have been used in the prevention of HBV reinfection， and the therapeutic regimens were different from each other. Conclusion Liver transplantation is an effective treatment for HBV-related disease． Appropriate prevention of HBV reinfection in the perioperative period of liver transplantation is important for the survivals of patients．
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of adefovir monotherapy (ADF) versus adefovir-Matrine combination therapy (ADF+M) for chronic hepatitis B. Methods Such databases as The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, PubMed, CBM, CNKI, WanFang and VIP Database were searched from the date of their establishment to July 2010, and the references of all included studies were also traced so as to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of ADF versus ADF+M. Quality assessment and data extraction were conducted in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook 5.0.2 by two reviewers independently. Meta-analyses were conducted by using RevMan 5.0 software. Results A total of 24 RCTs involving 2 092 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that at the end of the treatment for both six months and 12 months, respectively, the ADF+M group was superior to ADF group with a significant difference in both the HBeAg seroconversion rate as the primary outcome (six months: RR=2.05, 95%CI 1.53 to 2.74; 12 months: RR=2.13 95%CI 1.74 to 2.60) and the secondary outcome such as HBV-DNA negative conversion, HBeAg negative conversion, ALT normalization, HBV-DNA variation, complete response and HBsAg negative conversion, etc. Conclusion As the current evidence shows, ADF+M therapy is superior to ADF therapy for chronic hepatitis B. The significant difference can even be observed at the end of the treatment for six months. However, the results should be interpreted with caution because of the low quality of the included studies. High-quality, large-scale RCTs are needed to further prove the results.
Objective To review the efficacy and safety of Kushenin combined with Adefovir Dipivoxil for Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB). Method Randomized controlled trails of Kushenin combined with Adefovir Dipivoxil for CHB were gathered from PubMed, CBMdisc (1978 to 2009), and CSJD (1989 to 2009), while other relative researches were searched manually; every research was evaluated, and then analyzed with RevMan 5.0.0 software. Result Ten randomized controlled trials were included; among total 855 patients, 436 were in trial group and the other 419 were in control group. As the Meta-analysis showed, the therapeutic effect of kushenin combined with Adefovir Dipivoxil was better than that of Adefovir Dipivoxil in aspects of improving the negative rate of serum ALT (RR=1.28, 95%CI 1.17 to 1.40), the negative rate of serum HBV-DNA (RR=1.27, 95%CI 1.13 to 1.42), the negative rate of serum HBeAg (RR=1.80, 95%CI 1.32 to 2.44), and the conversion rate of HBeAg and anti-HBe (RR2.06, 95%CI 1.43 to 2.95). Conclusion Kushenin combined with Adefovir Dipivoxil in treating CHB can improve the conversion rate of HBeAg and anti-HBe and further take better therapeutic effect.
Objective To compare adefovir monotherapy with adefovir-thymosin alpha-1 combination therapy for chronic hepatitis B. Methods We searched The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, PubMed, the Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM), CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases up to February 2010 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing adefovir plus thymosin alpha-1 versus adefovir alone for chronic hepatitis B. We also scanned references of all included studies and pertinent reviews. The methodological quality assessment and data extraction were conducted by two reviewers independently according to the Cochrane Reviewer’s Handbook 5.0.2 . Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 5.0 software. Results Eleven trials involving 895 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses shoued: the HBeAg seroconversion rate of the combination therapy group was higher than that of the monotherapy group, both at the sixth month and the twelfth month (RR=1.77, 95%CI 1.38 to 2.27; RR=1.74, 95%CI 1.44 to 2.10); and there were also significant differences between the two groups for secondary outcomes including HBV-DNA negative, ALT normalization, etc.Conclusion Adefovir-thymosin alpha-1 combination therapy might be more effective than adefovir monotherapy for chronic hepatitis B. Significant differences are even observed at the sixth month. However, the results should be interpreted with caution because of the low quality of the included studies. High-quality, large-scale RCTs are needed to further prove the results.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of telbivudine (TEV) combined with adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) for chronic hepatitis B (CHB), so as to provide references for clinical practice and research. MethodsWe electronically searched databases including The Cochrane Library (Issue 7, 2013), PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, CBM, CNKI, VIP, and WanFang Data from inception to August 21st, 2013, for the relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Other sources were also retrieved. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the quality of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1 software. ResultsA Total of 11 RCTs involving 1 010 patients were included. The trial group were given TEV combined with ADV, while the control group were given TEV alone or ADV alone. The results of metaanalysis showed that, the combined use was superior to TEV alone or ADV alone in improving HBV-DNA negative rates at 12-, 24-, 48-weeks, HBeAg negative rates at 12-, 24-, 48-weeks, and ALT recovery rates at 12-, 24-weeks (P < 0.05). The results of qualitative analysis showed that, the trial group had a lower drug resistance rate, and both were alike in the incidence of adverse reaction. ConclusionCompared with TEV alone or ADV alone, TEV combined with ADV could improve the clinical efficacy of treating CHB which is also fairly safe. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, the aforementioned conclusion still needs to be further verified by conducting more large-scale and high quality RCTs.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of lamivudine (LAM) plus adefovir (ADV) versus entecavir (ETV) monotherapy for LAM-resistant chronic hepatitis B patients. MethodsWe electronically searched databases including PubMed, The Cochrane Library (Issue 12, 2013), CBM, CNKI, VIP, WanFang Data from their inception to December 2013, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or cohort studies of LAM+ADV versus ETV for LAM-resistant chronic hepatitis B. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data and assessed the methodological quality of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2 software. ResultsA total of 13 RCTs and 5 cohort studies involving 1 336 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses of RCTs showed that:there were no significant differences between the LAM+ADV group and the ETV group in the negative rates of serum HBV-DNA (RR=1.00, 95%CI 0.91 to 1.10, P=0.94), HBeAg (RR=0.90, 95%CI 0.70 to 1.17, P=0.43), serum ALT recovery rate (RR=0.97, 95%CI 0.90 to 1.05, P=0.45) and serum HBeAg conversion rate (RR=0.71, 95%CI 0.40 to 1.24, P=0.22) at the 48th week. The results of meta-analyses of cohort studies showed that:there were no significant differences between the two groups in the negative rates of serum HBV-DNA (RR=1.37, 95% CI 0.91 to 2.06, P=0.13) and serum ALT recovery rate (RR=0.99, 95%CI 0.87 to 1.12, P=0.87), but the ETV group had higher serum HBeAg conversion rate (RR=0.24, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.79, P=0.02). ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that the efficacy of LAM+ADV is similar to ETV at the 48th week for LAM-resistant chronic hepatitis B patients. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of peginterferon alpha (PEG-IFNα) initially combined with lamivudine (LAM) or adefovir (ADV) in treatment of HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. MethodsWe electronically searched databases including The Cochrane Library (Issue 11, 2014), PubMed, CBM, CNKI, VIP, and WanFang Data from inception to December 2014, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about PEG-IFNα initially combined with LAM or ADV for HBeAg-positive CHB. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.2 software. ResultsA total of 11 RCTs involving 2031 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: After 48 weeks of treatment, the HBsAg seroconversion rate of the PEG-IFNα plus ADV group was significantly higher than that of the PEG-IFNα monotherapy group (8.6% vs. 0%, OR=7.73, 95%CI 1.53 to 39.05, P=0.01) or the ADV monotherapy group (8.5% vs. 0%, OR=7.75, 95%CI 1.07 to 56.23, P=0.04); and the HBsAg seroclearance rate in the combination therapy group was significantly higher than that of the ADV monotherapy group (10.5% vs. 1.2%, OR=5.56, 95%CI to 2.14 to 14.47, P=0.0004). After 52 weeks of treatment, the HBsAg seroconversion rate of the PEG-IFNα plus LAM group was significantly higher than that of the PEG-IFNα monotherapy group (11.6% vs. 5.6%, OR=2.21, 95%CI 1.04 to 4.72, P=0.04). After 26 weeks of follow-up, no significant differences were found between the combination therapy group and the PEG-IFNα monotherapy group in HBsAg seroclearance rate and HBsAg seroconversion rate (all P values >0.05). ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that, compared with PEG-IFNα, LAM, or ADV monotherapy, PEG-IFNα plus LAM or ADV could improve the HBsAg seroclearance or seroconversion rate after 48-52 weeks of treatment for HBeAg-positive CHB, but this effect is still limited. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo explore the effectiveness of lamividine (LAM) combined with adefovir (ADV) versus entecavir (ETV) for lamivudine-resistant (LAM-R) hepatitis B in renal transplant recipients. MethodOutpatients and inpatients of lamivudine-resistant kidney graft recipients with chronic hepatitis B admitted to West China Hospital and the People's Hospital of Santai County during Jan 2007 to Mar 2012 were divided into A group (LAM+ADV) and B group (ETV). And the level of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), level of serum creatinine, HBV serological markers and HBV-DNA load were compared by SPSS 16.0 software. ResultsA total of 15 patients were included. The mean age was 36.7±6.6 years old, the majority of patients were male. After treatment for 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks, 96 weeks, no significant differences were found between two groups in liver function normalization rates, the HBV-DNA negative conversion rates and serum creatinine level. ConclusionsLAM add-on ADV combination therapy and ETV monotherapy were both safe and effective in LAM-R kidney transplants with CHB, but the load of HBV-DNA in some patients were still positive at the endpoint. Elevated serum creatinine level may occur in some patients who treated with ADV. Consequently, for HBsAg-positive kidney transplantation patients, those anti-HBV drugs that are more effective, safer and less resistant may be better in the beginning of treatment.