Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of postoperative intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion chemotherapy (IHPC) for advanced gastric cancer, so as to provide references for clinical practice and study. Methods The following databases including The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang were searched on computer, and other searches were also performed to collect all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on postoperative IHPC versus intravenous chemotherapy alone (IC) for advanced gastric cancer. The quality of the included studies was assessed according to Cochrane Handbook 5.1 for Systematic Review, and Meta-analysis was conducted by using RevMan 5.1 software. Results A total of 18 RCTs involving 2299 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that: a) Efficacy evaluation: There were significant differences between the IHPC group and the IC group in 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year survival rate, 3- and 5-year recurrence rate, and 3- and 5-year distant metastasis rate; the OR value and 95%CI were 1.88 (1.49, 2.39), 2.45 (1.64, 3.67), 2.29 (1.92, 2.73), 2.17 (1.70, 2.76), 0.39 (0.29, 0.52), 0.54 (0.40, 0.72), 0.55 (0.38, 0.78), 0.58 (0.42, 0.81), respectively; b) Safety evaluation: There were significant differences between the IHPC group and the IC group in the incidence of abdominal pain, abdominal distension, nausea and vomiting; the OR value and 95%CI were 2.20 (1.58, 3.07), 7.00 (2.67, 18.36), 0.65 (0.45, 0.95), respectively. But there were no significant differences between the IHPC group and the IC group in the incidence of alopecia, ileus, bone marrow inhibition, and hepatic lesion. Conclusion Compared with IC, postoperative IHPC+IC can improve survival rate and reduce the recurrence and distant metastasis rate; additionally, it is safe and feasible, so it is recommended that the detailed condition of patients should be taken into consideration when the postoperative IHPC+IC therapy is applied to clinic.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of lentinan on immune function in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Methods We searched MEDLINE (1969-2006), EMBASE (1984-2006), OVID (1969-2006), CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in The Cochrane Library) (Issue 4, 2006), the Chinese Biomedicine Database (1978-2006) and CNKI (1978-2006). We also handsearched relevant journals. Pharmaceutical companies were contacted to identify additional randomized controlled trials. We assessed the identified studies in order to include high quality studies. Results Ten studies (containing 786 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Six trials shown that lentinan+FAM had significant efficacy upon patients with advanced gastric cancer compared with FAM in overall response [Plt;0.01, RR1.70, 95%CI (1.39,2.09)]. In three trials, a significant effect of lentinan+FAM group compared with FAM group in quantity of CD3+ T, T4/T8, NK was found, but lower than FAM group in side- effect of digestive system [RR0.71, 95%CI (0.55,0.91)]. The other trail identified there were fewer side effects in lentinan+FAM group compared with FAM group, though did not discribe the overall response. In case the significant heterogeneity, meta-analysis could not be used for the other three trails included, since the components of chemotherapeutic agents (ATP+Co-A+Vc; DDP+ Epirubicin+5FU; 5FU+CF+VP16) were not the same. In the three trials, overall response was statistically significant better in the lentinan group than in the control group, and lentinan group could significantly increase the quantity of CD3+ T, T4/T8, NK compared with control group. Conclusions The present meta-analysis suggested that addition of lentinan to standard chemotherapy provided a significant advantage over chemotherapy alone in terms of efficacy for patients with advanced gastric cancer. However, most of trials included in the review were of low quality, therefore, it is of necessity to conduct multi-center randomized-controlled trials of high quality.
Objective To observe the effect of cisplatin in bletilla hyacinthine particle chemotherapy combined with 125I brachytherapy on short-and long-term outcomes and the toxic and side effects in advanced gastric cancer. Methods One hundred seventy-six patients with stage Ⅱ or stage Ⅲ advanced gastric cancer underwent curative surgical resection were included in this study. They were randomly divided into brachytherapy and chemotherapy group (n=48), intraperitoneal chemotherapy group (n=32) and intravenous chemotherapy group (n=48), and other patients who abandoned radiotherapy and chemotherapy and signed informed consent form by themselves were considered as control group (n=48). The short-and long-term outcomes and the toxic and side effects were observed and the survival of all patients was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method and Log-Rank test. Results For short-term outcomes, the total effective rate in 4 groups were 95.83%, 71.88%, 64.58% and 52.08% respectively, and the difference was significant (Plt;0.05). For long-term outcomes, the 3 -and 5-year mortality rate was 37.50% and 56.30%, and 5-year median survival time was (14±4.51) months (95%CI: 14.419-4.512) in brachytherapy and chemotherapy group patients. The 3- and 5-year mortality rate was 78.12%and 93.75%and 5year median survival time was (10.6±1.13) months (95%CI: 10.620-1.163) in intraperitoneal chemotherapy group patients. The 3-and 5-year mortality rate was 79.21%and 95.80%and 5-year median survival time was (11±3.10) months (95%CI: 11.130-3.162) in intravenous chemotherapy group patients. The 3-and 5-year mortality rate was 87.50%and 95.83% and 5-year median survival time was (9±2.30) months (95%CI: 10.024-1.180) in control group patients. Compared with the vein chemotherapy group, the short distance puts the chemotherapy group disgusting vomit, the marrow to suppress, the liver function harm, the kidney function harm formation rate to reduce obviously (Plt;0.05). Conclusion Cisplatin in bletilla hyacinthine particle chemotherapy combined with 125I brachytherapy can reduce the toxic and side effects of drugs and prolong survival time of patients with advanced gastric cancer.
ObjectiveTo summarized the clinical experience on laparoscopic radical surgery in patients with advanced distal gastric cancer. MethodsThe clinical data of 26 patients with advanced distant gastric cancer undergoing laparoscopic gastrectomy were retrospectively analyzed. ResultsLaparoscopic distal gastrectomy was performed successfully in all patients. The operation time was (283.2±27.6) min (270-450 min) and the blood loss was (178.4±67.4) ml (80-350 ml). The time of gastrointestinal function recovery was (2.8±1.2) d (2-4 d), out of bed activity time was (1.5±0.4) d (1-3 d) and liquid diet feeding was (3.5±1.4) d (3-4 d). The hospital stay was (10.0±2.6) d (7-13 d). The number of harvested lymph nodes was 11 to 34 (17.8±7.3). The distance from proximal surgical margin to tumor was (7.0±2.1) cm (5-12 cm) and the distance from distal surgical margin to tumor was (5.5±1.8) cm (4-8 cm), thus surgical margins were negative in all samples. All patients were followed up for 3-48 months (mean 18.5 months), two patients with poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma died of extensive metastasis in 13 and 18 months, respectively, and other patients survived well. ConclusionsLaparoscopic radical gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer is safe and feasible. However, the advantage of laparoscopic technique over the conventional open surgery requires further study.
Objective To investigate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy for distant gastric cancer. Methods All 18 patients with distant gastric cancer receiving laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy were analyzed. Results Laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy was performed successfully in all patients. The mean operation time was (291.33±19.61) min. The mean blood loss was (151.32±71.78) ml. The mean numbers of harvested lymph node were 14.57±3.11. The mean time of gastrointestinal function recovery was (3.46±0.93) d, the mean out of bed activity time was (1.75±0.45) d. All patients were followed up for 1-24 months, mean 11 months. No local recurrence, trocar implant or distant metastasis happened. Conclusion Laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy is a feasible and safe surgical procedure combined with minimal trauma and fast recovery.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the relationship between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene C677T polymorphism and efficacy of fluorouracil-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). MethodsComputer retrieval in China Journal Full-text Database, Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database, Wanfang database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, PubMed, EMbase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science Database (from their establishment to May 28, 2013) was performed to include case-control studies on MTHFR gene C677T polymorphism and sensitivity to fluorouracil-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Statistical analysis was done by using RevMan 5.1 software. ResultsSeven case-control studies with 775 patients were included. The meta-analysis showed that among MTHFR C677T genotypes, for TT vs. CC, OR=4.63, 95%CI (1.23, 17.4); and for CC+CT vs. TT, OR=0.21, 95%CI (0.06, 0.78). Subgroup analysis of Asian group showed that for TT vs. CC, OR=32.99, 95%CI (11.40,95.42); and for CC+CT vs. TT, OR=0.04, 95%CI (0.02, 0.10). Sensitivity analysis performed according to different detection methods showed that for TT vs. CC, OR=6.03, 95%CI (1.53, 23.72); and for CC+CT vs.TT, OR=0.17, 95%CI (0.04, 0.68). ConclusionPolymorphism of MTHFR C677T gene may be associated with sensitivity to fluorouracil-based chemotherapy in patients with AGC.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel (DOC) combined with oxaliplatin (OXA) regimen in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. MethodsSixty patients with advanced gastric cancer treated in our hospital from January 2008 to January 2011 were randomly divided into two groups. The treatment group (n=30) was given DOC combined with OXA regimen. Patients in this group were treated with DOC 75 mg/m2, ivgtt, d1; OXA 130 mg/m2, ivgtt, d4; with 21 days as a cycle. The control group (n=30) was given DCF regimen. Patients in the control group were treated with DOC 75 mg/m2, ivgtt, d1; cisplatin 75 mg/m2, ivgtt, d1; calcium folinate 200/m2, ivgtt, 2 h, d1-2; fluorouracil 400 mg/m2, bolus 10 minutes, fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 civ 22 h d1-2; also with 21 days as a cycle. All patients received two cycles of chemotherapy at least. The effective rate (complete remission+partial remission), adverse reactions, median survival time and quality of life were analyzed and compared between the two groups. ResultsThe effective rates in the treatment group and the control group were 60.0% and 46.7% respectively, showing a non-significant difference (P>0.05). The appetite increasing rate (70.0% vs 43.3%), the weight gain rate (60.0% vs 33.3%), and the Karnofsky score improvement rate (63.3% vs 30.0%) of the treatment group were significantly higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). The adverse reactions were fewer in the treatment group, and most of them were between grade Ⅰ and Ⅱ. The median time of disease progression (5.8 months vs 5.6 months) and the median survival period (11.8 months vs 9.2 months) of the treatment group were longer than those in the control group. ConclusionDOC combined with OXA regimen is effective in treating advanced gastric cancer. It can significantly improve the quality of life of the patients, and it has fewer adverse reactions. Meanwhile, the median survival period is prolonged. DOC combined with OXA regimen is worth to be applied in clinic.
ObjectiveTo observe the clinical curative effect of interventional chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. MethodsThirty advanced gastric cancer patients underwent arterial infusion chemotherapy and embolization treatment between January and December 30, 2013. The treatment was carried out every three weeks. We evaluated the clinical results after the third treatment. The clinical improvement was assessed based on alleviation of such symptoms as epigastric pain, poor appetite, nausea, vomiting and fecal occult blood. The tumor size was evaluated through abdominal CT examination. ResultsAbdominal pain relieved in 19 out of 28 patients (67.9%); appetite improved in 18 out of 24 patients (75.0%); vomiting relieved in 15 out of 16 cases (93.8%); and fecal 9 out of 12 patients with positive occult blood turned to negative (75.0%). The total effective rate was 83.3%, and 8 patients accepted interventional therapy after operation. The survival rates during the 6, 12 and 24-month follow-up were respectively 85.0%, 65.0%, and 25.0%. ConclusionsInterventional chemotherapy and embolization treatment are effective for advanced gastric cancer, which can relieve symptoms and lower tumor stage. Some patients have a second chance of operation, which can be an effective method in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of S-1 and oxaliplatin in the first-line chemotherapy of patients with advanced gastric cancer. Methods From March 2012 to April 2013, 57 patients in the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University were enrolled in this study. Oxaliplatin was administered at 130 mg/m2 on day 1, while S-1 was administered orally (< 1.25 m2: 40 mg twice per day; 1.25-1.50 m2: 50 mg twice per day; > 1.50 m2: 60 mg twice per day) for 14 days. The response was evaluated every two chemotherapy cycles. Results The objective response rate was 52.6%, and the disease control rate was 84.2%. The median time to progression was 5.8 months, and the median survival time was 13.5 months. The major grade 3/4 hematological toxic effects were neutropenia (12.3%) and thrombocytope nia (12.3%), and the grade 3/4 non-hematological toxic effects were vomiting, fatigue and sensory neuropathy. The rate of clinical benefit response was 71.9% (41/57). Conclusion The regimen of oxaliplatin and S-1 shows precise efficacy and good tolerance against advanced gastric cancer, and it is worthy of promotion and application in the future.
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical effects of continuous hyperthermic peritoneal perfusion chemotherapy (CHPPC) and intravenous chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer patients, and find better nursing methods. MethodsSixty advanced gastric cancer patients who underwent chemotherapy between June 2013 and June 2014 were divided into CHPPC group (group C, n=30) and intravenous chemotherapy group (group V, n=30). We recorded the nursing methods for both the two groups, patients' satisfaction to the nursing and treatment, peritoneal metastasis rate and quality of life during the chemotherapy. ResultsThe life quality in group V was lower than that in group C (P<0.05). The differences in patients' satisfaction rate, peritoneal metastasis rate, and one-year survival rate were not significantly different between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionFor patients with advanced gastric cancer requiring chemotherapy, in spite of higher cost and more complicated operations, CHPPC is superior in lower adverse events rate, better quality of life during chemotherapy and doesn't decrease patients' satisfaction to the nursing and treatment.