Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of domestic ambroxol hydrochloride injection in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infection. Methods A total of 120 patients with respiratory tract infections were included and randomized into the treatment group (ambroxol hydrochloride injection 30mg, iv, q12h) and the control group (mucosolvan ampoule 30mg, iv, q12h). The duration of treatment was 6 days. Results 118 patients completed the trial, 59 in each group. From Day 1 to Day 6, the severity scores of cough, sputum amount, difficulty in expectoration and rales were similar between the two groups (Pgt;0.05), but a significant difference was observed in the nature of sputum (Plt;0.05). The total effective rates of the treatment group and the control group were 96.6% (FAS analysis and PP analysis) or 93.3% (FAS analysis), and 94.9% (PP analysis), respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups (Pgt;0.05). The incidence of adverse effects was comparable between the two groups (1.7% vs. 0%, Pgt;0.05), and no severe adverse effect was observed. Conclusion The efficacy of domestic ambroxol hydrochloride injection in the treatment of lower respiratory infection was equal to that of mucosolvan ampoule, and it can even further improve the nature of sputum. Ambroxol hydrochloride was as safe as mucosolvan ampoule.
ObjectiveTo retrospectively analyze off-label drug use (OLDU) situation of ambroxol hydrochloride injection (AHI) among inpatients in the Guangdong General Hospital in 2012, so as to provide references for AHI OLDU. MethodsAll medical orders of AHI for inpatients in the Guangdong General Hospital in 2012 were included, and OLDU was judged according to drug labels. We summarized situation of drug use in all departments, analyzed OLDU incidence in administration path and in dose, calculated prescribed daily dose (PDD) and utilization index (DUI) in each department to evaluate the degree of OLDU in dose. Resultsa) A total of inpatients 138 227 patient-days who used AHI were included. OLDU occurred in all departments in this hospital and the total OLDU incidence was 67.06%. b) OLDU in dose occurred in 71.43% of the departments (25/35) with an incidence of 29.53%; the top 4 departments were cardiac surgery intensive care unit department (CICU) (97.74%), cardiac surgery department (97.51%), pediatric cardiac surgery department (72.30%) and pediatric intensive care unit department (PICU) (70.28%) in order. c) The PDDs in CICU department, cardiac surgery department, PICU departments, pediatric cardiac surgery department, oncological surgery ward, neurosurgery ward and intensive care unit (ICU) were higher than the defined daily dose (DDD), of which, the DUI/cDUI in CICU, cardiac surgery department, PICU and pediatric cardiac surgery department were 1 to 3 times higher than normal level. d) No relevant adverse drug reaction/adverse event (ADR/AE) reports were received in this hospital in 2012. ConclusionAHI is widely used in the Guangdong General Hospital, and AHI OLDU is commonly-seen. Further studies should be conducted to analyze the influence factors of AHI OLDU in dose and to evaluate the rationality of its application.
ObjectiveTo investigate the situation of off-label drug use in dose (OLDUD) of ambroxol hydrochloride injection (AHI) in perioperative period among patients for stanford type A aortic dissection in Guangdong General Hospital, so as to provide references for the rational application of AHI in clinical practice. MethodsAll medical orders of AHI for patients had aortic arch replacement for Stanford type A aortic dissection in Guangdong General Hospital between January 2005 and December 2014 were included. The patients were divided into a mild OLDUD ( < 450 mg) group, a moderate OLDUD (450 mg≤OLDUD < 900 mg) group, and a high OLDUD (≥900 mg)group. The preoperative and postoperative features, incidence of PPCs, mortality, incidence of reintubation, time of mechanical ventilation, time stay in ICU, time stay in hospital and the overall costs among three groups were compared by SPSS 22.0 software. Resultsa) A total of 549 patients were included. The incidence of OLDUD was 99.82%. The most common PMDDs were 450 mg (n=358) and 900 mg (n=88). b) The three groups were well matched for perioperative and operative variables. c) The incidence of preoperative drug use was 8.6%. The incidences (5.5% vs. 7.7% vs. 15.7%, P=0.022) and maximum doses (180 mg vs. 300 mg vs. 450 mg, P=0.014) of preoperative drug use were statistically different in mild OLDUD, moderate OLDUD and high OLDUD groups. The days of preoperative drug use were not different (3 d vs. 2.5 d vs. 2 d, P=0.307). The days of postoperative drug use (9.5 d vs. 13 d vs. 19 d, P < 0.001) and postoperative drug use in maximum doses (7 d vs. 8 d vs. 7 d, P=0.005) were different. d) The incidence of PPCs was 100%, and the mortality (8.2% vs. 6.6% vs. 9.0%, P=0.696) was not statistically different among mild OLDUD, moderate OLDUD and high OLDUD groups. However the incidence of reintubation (14.3% vs. 13.8% vs. 27%, P=0.009), time of mechanical ventilation (37 h vs. 50 h vs. 114 h, P < 0.001), time stay in ICU (138 h vs. 178.5 h vs. 316 h, P < 0.001), time stay in hospital (25 d vs. 27 d vs. 34 d, P=0.001) and the overall costs (¥ 0.17 million vs. ¥ 0.19 million vs. ¥ 0.25 million, P < 0.001) were different among three groups. Moreover, they were all increasing along with the dose of AHI. ConclusionAHI cannot improve the prognosis of patients having aortic arch replacement for Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection in a dose-dependent manner. Further well-designed prospective studies should be conducted to verification or falsification.