Objective To estimate the efficacy and tolerability of combination of Amlodipine and different angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) in comparison with Amlodipine monotherapy in the treatment of hypertension. Methods We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 2, 2009), PubMed, MEDLINE, EMbase, CBM, and CNKI (from their inception to August 2009) for relevant studies. Two reviewers independently retrieved randomized controlled trials (RCTs) according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, assessed the methodological quality of included trials, and extracted data. Meta-analysis was performed by Stata 10.0 soft. Results Seventeen RCTs involving 3 291 patients were ultimately identified. The results of meta-analyses showed combination had a greater systolic blood pressure reduction (WMD=5.72, 95%CI 4.10 to 7.33, P=0.016) and diastolic blood pressure reduction (WMD=3.62, 95%CI 4.85 to 2.39, P=0.000) than monotherapy. Combination had fewer overall adverse events (RR=0.86, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.99) than that of monotherapy. Conclusion The results of meta-analyses indicate that combination provides a superior blood pressure control to that of monotherapy and has fewer adverse events and better tolerability in hypertensive patients.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of amlodipine versus valsartan in the treatment of diabetes mellitus combined with hypertension and renal impairment. MethodsAll relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were retrieved in WanFang Data, CNKI, VIP, CBM, The Cochrane Library (Issue 10, 2013), PubMed, EMbase and Ovid up to October 2013. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2. ResultsNine RCTs were finally included involving 794 cases. The results of meta-analysis showed that amlodipine was better than valsartan in improving 24-hour proteinuria (basic level < 1 000 mg:WMD=-10.24, 95%CI-18.52 to-1.95, P=0.02; basic level > 1 000 mg:WMD=-575.69, 95%CI-781.02 to-370.36, P < 0.000 01). However, there was no significant difference between two groups in lowing urine albumin excretion rates (UAER), serum creatinine (Scr), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and incidences of adverse events (UAER:WMD=-11.29, 95%CI-27.93 to 5.36, P=0.18; Scr:WMD=1.05, 95%CI-3.89 to 5.99, P=0.68; SBP:WMD=0.52, 95%CI-0.83 to 1.87, P=0.45; DBP:WMD=-0.40, 95%CI-1.41 to 0.62, P=0.44; ADR:WMD=1.00, 95%CI 0.3 to 3.34, P=1.00). ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that, compared with valsartan, amlodipine has the same efficacy in treatment of diabetes mellitus combined with hypertension and renal impairment, and it is even better in improving 24-hour proteinuria.