ObjectiveTo explore the feasibility and short-term effectiveness of ankle arthrodesis by ankle osteotomy-tool. MethodsA retrospective analysis was made on the data of 38 patients with end-stage ankle arthritis undergoing ankle arthrodesis between February 2009 and March 2012. There were 24 males and 14 females, with an average age of 67 years (range, 40-85 years). The left ankle was involved in 18 cases and the right ankle in 20 cases. There were 20 cases of post-traumatic arthritis, 7 cases of avascular necrosis of talus, 5 cases of rheumatoid arthritis, 5 cases of primary osteoarthritis, and 1 case of post infective arthritis. The disease duration ranged 3.2-6.1 years (mean, 4.7 years). The ankle osteotomy-tool was used to remove the joint surfaces, and proximal humeral locking plate combined with compression screws were used for internal fixation. ResultsThe operation time was 40-90 minutes (mean, 60 minutes). The healing of incisions by first intention was obtained in the other cases except 1 case of superficial infection, which was cured after dressing change. Thirty-eight patients were followed up 10 to 36 months (mean, 23 months). The ankles in 4 patients started to swell repeatedly when they walked early after operation and the swelling subsided at 1 year after rehabilitation therapy. The X-ray films showed that bone fusion was obtained at 12 weeks after operation on average (range, 10-19 weeks). No internal fixation failure or malunion occurred. The mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score was improved significantly from 43.11±17.49 at preoperation to 85.03±13.17 at last follow-up (t=14.412, P=0.000). The short-form 36 health survey scale (SF-36) showed that physical component summary score was increased significantly from preoperative 54.30±12.32 to postoperative 77.95±8.21 (t=7.723, P=0.000), and mental component summary score was significantly increased from preoperative 63.16±8.30 to postoperative 77.05±10.12 (t=2.523, P=0.021). According to the patients' satisfaction, 32 patients were very satisfied, 5 patients were satisfied, and 1 patient was not satisfied. The subjective satisfaction of patients was 97.37%. ConclusionAnkle arthrodesis by lateral malleolus osteotomy with ankle osteotomy-tool and internal fixation using proximal humeral locking plate and compression screws has the advantages of simple operation, less complications, rigid fixation, and high fusion rate. It may obtain a good short-term effectiveness.
Objective To investigate the mid- and long-term effectiveness of external fixator distraction arthroplasty in the treatment of moderate to severe ankle arthritis. Methods The clinical data of 23 patients with moderate to severe ankle arthritis treated with external fixation distraction arthroplasty who met the selection criteria between January 2007 and November 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 20 males and 3 females; the age ranged from 21 to 65 years, with an average age of 43.7 years. Etiology included 8 cases of primary ankle arthritis, in which 5 cases combined with varus deformity; 15 cases of traumatic ankle arthritis, the cause of injury was 5 cases after ankle fracture surgery, 3 cases after Pilon fracture surgery, 5 cases of chronic ankle instability and repeated sprain, and 2 cases of other causes. According to Takakura staging system, there were 4 cases of stage ⅢA, 12 cases of stage ⅢB, and 7 cases of stage Ⅳ; according to Giannini staging system, there were 5 cases of stage Ⅱ and 18 cases of stage Ⅲ; according to Cheng staging system, 16 cases were in stage Ⅲ, and 7 cases stage Ⅳ. American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score and visual analogue scale (VAS) score were used to evaluate the improvement of ankle pain and function before operation and at last follow-up, and the data were analyzed according to different etiological groups. At last follow-up, the surgical results were evaluated subjectively and objectively. The changes of ankle joint space before operation and at last follow-up were compared. The patients were divided into two groups according to their age: ≤45 years old group [young group, 10 cases, aged (35.62±7.41) years old] and >45 years old group [middle-aged and elderly group, 13 cases, aged (54.20±6.20) years old]. The AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score and VAS score were compared before and after operation between the two groups, and the influence of age on distraction arthroplasty was analyzed. ResultsThe external fixator was removed after 3 months of continuous distraction,12 patients got infection around the wire tunnels. All the 23 patients were followed up 13-143 months, with an average of 56.9 months; the follow-up time was (43.46±32.77) months and (69.80±37.79) months in the young group and middle-aged and elderly group, respectively. At last follow-up, the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score and VAS score significantly improved when compared with those before operation (P<0.05). According to etiological analysis, there was no significant difference in AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score and VAS score before and after operation (P>0.05) in Pilon fracture patients, while the significant difference was found in remaining patients (P<0.05). There was significant difference in AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score before operation between the young group and the middle-aged and elderly group (t=2.110, P=0.040), but no significant difference in preoperative VAS score and the differences in VAS score and AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score before and after operation between the two groups (P>0.05). The subjective and objective results of pain evaluation at last follow-up showed that 4 patients had no pain, 12 patients had moderate pain relief, 5 patients had mild pain relief, and 2 patients had no significant pain relief; among the 10 patients who were followed up more than 5 years, there were 2, 5, 2, and 1 patient, respectively; 2 patients who were followed up more than 10 years had moderate pain relief. At last follow-up, the ankle joint space was (3.7±0.4) mm, which significantly increased when compared with before operation [(1.5±0.2) mm] (t=1.791, P=0.002). The ankle joint space was (2.9±0.5) mm in 10 patients who were followed up more than 5 years, and 3.3 mm and 3.0 mm in 2 patients who were followed up more than 10 years. Conclusion Distraction arthroplasty of the ankle joint can achieve satisfactory results in patients with moderate to severe ankle arthritis (except for arthritis caused by Pilon fracture), and age has no significant effect on distraction arthroplasty.
ObjectiveTo investigate the short-term effectiveness of calcaneal lateral displacement osteotomy with lateral ligament repair in the treatment of Takakura stage Ⅱ varus-type ankle arthritis. MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 13 patients with Takakura stage Ⅱ varus-type ankle arthritis treated with calcaneal lateral displacement osteotomy with lateral ligament repair between January 2016 and December 2020. There were 6 males and 7 females aged 31-65 years, with an average age of 53.6 years. The preoperative tibial-ankle surface angle (TASA) was (88.13±1.01)°, medial distal tibial angle (MDTA) was (86.36±1.49)°, tibial talar surface angle (TTSA) was (6.03±1.63)°, talar tilting angle (TTA) was (81.95±2.15)°, and tibiocalcaneal axis angle (TCAA) was (−5.74±6.81)°. The preoperative American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score was 56.3±7.1 and the pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score was 3.7±0.5. AOFAS scores, VAS scores, TTSA, TTA, and TCAA were compared between pre- and post-operatively. Results All 13 patients were followed up 14-41 months, with an average of 28.7 months. The osteotomies healed in all patients. The last follow-up revealed TTA, TTSA, and TCAA to be (88.27±1.19)°, (−0.13±1.37)°, and (2.09±5.10)° respectively, the AOFAS score was 84.3±4.2 and the VAS score was 0.7±0.5, all showing significant improvement when compared to preoperative values (P<0.05). Conclusion For patients with Takakura stage Ⅱ varus-type ankle arthritis, calcaneal lateral displacement osteotomy with lateral ligament repair can correct the lower limb force line, regain ankle stability, and achieving good short-term effectiveness.
Objective To assess the effectiveness of supramalleolar osteotomy (SMOT) as a therapeutic intervention for varus-type ankle arthritis, while also examining the associated risk factors that may contribute to treatment failure. MethodsThe clinical data of 82 patients (89 feet) diagnosed with varus-type ankle arthritis and treated with SMOT between January 2016 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The patient cohort consisted of 34 males with 38 feet and 48 females with 51 feet, with the mean age of 54.3 years (range, 43-72 years). The average body mass index was 24.43 kg/m2 (range, 20.43-30.15 kg/m2). The preoperative tibial anterior surface angle (TAS) ranged from 77.6° to 88.4°, with a mean of 84.4°. The modified Takakura stage was used to classify the severity of the condition, with 9 feet in stage Ⅱ, 41 feet in stage Ⅲa, and 39 feet in stage Ⅲb. Clinical functional assessment was conducted using the Maryland sore, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and psychological and physical scores in Health Survey 12-item Short From (SF-12). Radiology evaluations include TAS, talar tilt (TT), tibiocrural angle (TC), tibial medial malleolars (TMM), tibiocrural distance (TCD), tibial lateral surface angle (TLS), and hindfoot alignment angle (HAA). The results of clinical failure, functional failure, and radiology failure were statistically analyzed, and the related risk factors were analyzed. ResultsThe operation time ranged from 45 to 88 minutes, with an average of 62.2 minutes. No complication such as fractures and neurovascular injuries was found during operation. There were 7 feet of poor healing of the medial incision; 9 pin tract infections occurred in 6 feet using external fixator; there were 20 cases of allograft and 3 cases of autograft with radiographic bone resorption. Except for 1 foot of severe infection treated with bone cement, the remaining 88 feet were primary healing, and the healing area was more than 80%. All patients were followed up 24-82 months, with an average of 50.2 months. Maryland score, VAS score, SF-12 psychological and physiological scores, and TAS, TC, TLS, TCD, TT, TMM, HAA, and Takakura stage were significantly improved at last follow-up (P<0.05). Postoperative clinical failure occurred in 13 feet, functional failure in 15 feet, and radiology failure in 23 feet. Univariate analysis showed that obesity, TT>10°, and Takakura stage Ⅲb were risk factors for clinical failure, HAA≥15° and Takakura stage Ⅲb were risk factors for functional failure, and TT>10° was risk factor for radiographic failure (P<0.05). Further logistic regression analysis showed that TT>10°, HAA≥15°, and TT>10° were risk factors for clinical failure, functional failure, and radiographic failure, respectively (P<0.05). Conclusion SMOT is effective in the mid- and long-term in the treatment of varus-type ankle arthritis, but it should be used with caution in patients with obesity, severe hindfoot varus, severe talus tilt, and preoperative Takakura stage Ⅲb.
Ankle arthritis affects approximately 1% of the adult population worldwide and represents a serious global disease burden. However, compared with hip arthritis and knee arthritis, the clinical understanding and treatment of ankle arthritis are still in their infancy. For end-stage ankle arthritis, ankle arthrodesis was considered as the “gold standard” in the past. However, ankle arthrodesis will result in loss of joint mobility, altered gait, limited daily activities, and accelerated degeneration of adjacent joints. Therefore, how to preserve the range of motion of the ankle joint while relieving pain is the key to the treatment of ankle arthritis. Currently, the surgical treatment of ankle arthritis includes arthroscopic debridement, periarticular osteotomies, osteochondral transplantation, ankle distraction arthroplasty, ankle arthrodesis, and total ankle arthroplasty. The choice of treatment should be individualized and based on various factors such as the patient’s symptoms, signs, imaging performance, complaints, and financial situation. However, there are no guidelines that give clear treatment recommendations. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct extensive and in-depth discussions on the diagnosis and treatment of ankle arthritis.