Objective To investigate the clinical application of relaying anteromedial thigh (AMT) perforator flap in resurfacing of the donor defect after anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap transfer. Methods Between February 2012 and December 2015, 23 cases of oral carcinoma underwent radical resection; after resection of lesions, the tongue or mouth floor defects were reconstructed by ALT perforator flaps, and the donor sites were repaired with relaying AMT perforator flap at the same stage. There were 21 males and 2 females,with a mean age of 52.6 years (range, 29-74 years). Sixteen patients had tongue squamous cell carcinoma and 7 patients had buccal cancer. According to TNM tumor stage, 3 cases were classified as T4N0M0, 5 cases as T4N1M0, 7 cases as T3N1M0, 5 cases as T3N2M0, and 3 cases as T3N0M0. The disease duration ranged from 6 to 18 months (mean, 8.8 months). Results The AMT perforators existed consistently in all patients. All flaps survived, and primary healing of wounds was obtained at recipient sites and donor sites. No vascular crisis, wound dehiscence, or obvious swelling occurred. All patients were followed up 6-20 months (mean, 9.4 months). There was only linear scar at the donor sites, and the function of thighs was normal. The color and contour of the flaps were satisfactory. Conclusion The relaying AMT perforator flap is an ideal choice to reconstruct the donor site of ALT flap.
ObjectiveTo investigate effectiveness of anteromedial thigh perforator flap in repair of soft tissue defects of lower limbs.MethodsBetween January 2015 and October 2018, 7 patients with soft tissue defects of the lower limbs were repaired with the anteromedial thigh perforator flaps. The patients were males, aged 8-30 years (median, 23 years). There were 5 cases of traffic accident injuries (the time from injury to admission was 1-4 hours, with an average of 1.5 hours), 1 case of scar formation after traffic accident, and 1 case of scar deformity after burn. The defect located in calf in 5 cases, foot in 1 case, and thigh in 1 case. The area of soft tissue defects ranged from 12 cm×4 cm to 21 cm×7 cm; and the area of flaps ranged from 14 cm×5 cm to 24 cm×8 cm. The donor sites were sutured directly.ResultsThe flaps survived completely after operation in 6 cases, and the wounds healed by the first intention; the partial necrosis of flap occurred and healed after skin graft repair in 1 case. One incision partially ruptured in the donor site and healed after dressing change; the other incisions healed by the first intetion. All patients were followed up 6 months to 2 years with an average of 9 months. Except 1 case complained of edema of the flap, the other patients had good shape, good color, and no swelling.ConclusionFor patients with soft tissue defects of lower limbs that cannot be repaired with anterolateral thigh perforator flap, the anteromedial thigh perforator flap can be used for good results.