Objective To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Methods Literatures relating to randomized controlled trials in English and Chinese on the comparison of clinical effectiveness after laparoscopic and open appendectomy in appendicitis from PubMed，Wiley Online Library，Medline，Embase，Cochrane，CNKI，VIP，CBM databases were extracted，and methodological quality was evaluated by two reviewers independently with designed extraction form. The Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 4.2.2 software was used for data analysis. The wound infection，hospitalization time，operation time，hospitalization expenses，and peritoneal abscess were compared between laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Results Eight published reports of eligible studies were extracted. Compared with the open appendectomy， laparoscopic appendectomy had significant differences in lower wound infection rate 〔OR=0.19，95%CI （0.09，0.38），P＜0.000 01〕， longer operation time 〔WMD=3.66，95%CI （0.50，6.82），P=0.02〕，and more hospitalization expenses〔WMD=503.96，95%CI （337.23，670.70），P＜0.000 01〕.But there were no significant differences in hospitalization time〔WMD=-0.11，95%CI （-3.64，3.43），P=0.95〕 and incidence rate of peritoneal abscess 〔OR=1.40，95%CI （0.23，8.64），P=0.71〕 between laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Conclusions The wound infection rate is lower，but the operation time is longer，the hospitalization expenses is more in laparoscopic appendectomy as compared with open appendectomy. There are no statistically significant differences of hospitalization time and incidence rate of abdominal abscess between laparoscopic and open appendectomy.
ObjectiveTo further explore and discuss the value of laparoscopic appendectomy. MethodsThe clinical data of 200 patients underwent appendectomy in this hospital from April 2009 to December 2010 were collected. The operation time, postoperative hospital stay, cost of hospitalization, postoperative anal exhaust time, postoperative pain score, and surgical complications were compared between laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy. ResultsThere were 8 cases conversion to the open approach in this series. The cost of laparoscopic appendectomy was higher than that of open appendectomy (Plt;0.05); the cases of chronic appendicitis, acute simple appendicitis, acute suppurative appendicitis within 36 h of onset treated by laparoscopic appendectomy had shorter operation time, shorter postoperative hospital stay, earlier postoperative anal exhaust time, and slighter postoperative pain than those treated by open appendectomy (Plt;0.05); the differences in postoperative hospital stay, postoperative anal exhaust time, postoperative pain of acute suppurative appendicitis more than 36 h of onset and acute gangrenous appendicitis treated by two types of surgery had no statistical significances (Pgt;0.05); the operation time of acute gangrenous appendicitis operated by laparoscopic surgery was longer than that by open appendectomy (Plt;0.05); incision infection rate of laparoscopic appendectomy was lower than that of open appendectomy (Plt;0.05). ConclusionsFor chronic appendicitis, acute simple appendicitis, and acute suppurative appendicitis within 36 h of onset, the outcome and advantages of laparoscopic appendectomy are outstanding, the value of application is clear; and for acute suppurative appendicitis more than 36 h of onset and acute gangrenous appendicitis, laparoscopic appendectomy is difficult and with high rate of conversion, no obvious advantages in recovery after surgery but an increase of medical costs, and the application value is not great.
ObjectiveTo summarize the clinical features and imaging features of CT in the omental torsion, and in order to reduce the misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis rate of imaging features. MethodsThe data of 16 cases of omental torsion (secondary 15 cases, primary 1 case) and 286 cases of acute appendicitis (eliminated the subhepatic and retroperitoneal ectopic appendix) in our hospital from 1998 to 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. ResultsEleven cases of omental torsion suffered from the shifting pain in right lower quadrant. No obvious shifting abdominal pain was observed in other 4 cases whose main manifestations were abdominal tenderness and rebound tenderness around umbilicus. The patient of the remaining 1 case had enclosed mass in the area of left groin with pain and suffered from continuous periumbilical pain. Abdominal spiral CT examination was performed in 16 patients before operation. Increased signal intensity of globular soft tissue, which deviating from McBurney's point, was found at level of distal umbilicus by preoperative spiral CT in 13 cases. One case of omental torsion associated with ncarcerated inguinal hernia was missed. ConclusionsOmental torsion manifests chiefly shifting pain in right lower quadrant, abdominal tenderness, and rebound tenderness around umbilicus. It is easily confused with appendicitis. Abdominal spiral CT should be chosen as a preferred means in preoperative diagnosis of omental torsion.