Objective To investigate the influence of enamel matrix proteins (EMPs) on the attachment, prol iferation and pre-mRNA of type I collagen synthesis of cultured human dermal fibroblast cells. Methods Human dermal fibroblast cells were obtained from human acrobystia and cultured in DMEM medium with 10% FBS. The 3rd to 6th passage cells were used. Ninety-six-well plates and 6-well plates were pre-coated with different concentrations of EMPs (50, 100, 150 and200 μg/ mL). ① The cell attachment experiment: 0.2 mL cells suspension at the concentration of 1 × 106/mL was added to the pre-coated 96-well plates as the experimental groups (groups A, B, C and D based on different concentrations of EMPs). At 1.5, 3.0, and 4.5 hours after inoculation, the attached cells were measured by MTT method. ② The cell prol iferation experiment: 0.2 mL cells suspension at the concentration of 5 × 104/mL was added to the pre-coated 96-well plates as the experimental groups (groups A1, B1, C1 and D1 based on the different concentrations of EMPs). At 2, 4, 6 and 8 days after inoculation, the cells were measured by MTT method. ③ The synthesis experiment of pre-mRNA: 2 mL cells at the concentration of 1 × 106/mL was added to the pre-coated 6-well plates as the experimental groups (groups A2, B2, C2 and D2 based on different concentrations of EMPs). At 5 days after inoculation, the synthesis of pre-mRNA was measured by RT-PCR method. Human dermal fibroblast cells were added to the un-coated plates as the control groups. Results ① The cell attachment experiment: There were significant differences in attachment cells between the control group, group A and the groups B, C and D (P lt; 0.05). There were no significant difference between group A and control group (P lt; 0.05). ② The cell prol iferation experiment: At 2 days, there were no significant differences in absorbance between the control group and the experimental groups (P gt; 0.05); at 4 days and 6 days, the absorbance of groups B1 (0.598 ± 0.020 and 0.639 ± 0.016 ), C1 (0.582 ± 0.017 and 0.641 ± 0.020) and D1 (0.574 ± 0.021and 0.635 ± 0.021) was significantly higher than that of the control group (0.548 ± 0.021 and 0.605 ± 0.019, P lt; 0.05); at 8 days, the absorbance of group B1 (0.629 ± 0.012) and group C1 (0.631 ± 0.014) was significantly higher than that of the control group (0.606 ± 0.031, P lt; 0.05). ③ The synthesis experiment of pre-mRNA: The synthesis of type I collage pre-mRNA of groups B2, C2 and D2 was significantly higher than that of the control group. Conclusion EMPs stimulate human dermal fibroblast cell attachment, prol iferation and synthesis of type I collage pre-mRNA, and its maximal effect can be achieved at the concentration of 100 μg /mL.
Objective To compare the attachment and growth of fibroblasts on the different porcine accellular dermal matrix (ADM) so as to find the suitable scaffold for tissue engineering skin. Methods Fibroblasts (5×10 5) were seeded on 4 kinds of ADMs which were crosslinked with glutaraldehyde, uncrosslinked, crosslinked with glutaraldehyde and removed basement membrane, corsslinked with glutaraldehyde and then meshed. The same density fibroblasts were seeded on petri dish as a control. Cell count was done on the 1st, 3rd, 5th days after seeding. The at tachment of fibroblasts on ADM sw as observed by HE staining. Results The grow th and at tachment of fibroblasts on cro sslinked and non2meshed ADM increasedmarkedly w hen compared w ith the o thers. There w as no obvious difference betw een the group s of w ith o r w ithout basement membrane. Conclus ion The above results indicate that non2meshed and co rsslinked w ith glutaraldehyde ADM ismo re suitable fo r the at tachment and grow th of fibroblasts than the o thers and that the modified ADM can be used fo r the scaffo ld of t issue engineering skin.
Objective To evaluate clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and maintenance after treatment from mandibular implant-supported overdentures with different attachment types. Methods We searched six electronic databases: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2005), Current Controlled Trials, MEDLINE (1966 to Sept. 2005), EMBASE (1984 to Sept. 2005), and Chinese biomedical database disk (1978 to Sept. 2005). Eleven Chinese professional journals in oral health were also handsearched from their first published issues. Three authors screened and selected the studies, appraised their methodological quality and extracted data from the studies. The results were presented narratively by meta-analysis. Results After strict screening, 12 trials involving 282 patients were included. Two of the trials were included in a meta-analysis with 27 patients in bar-clip group, 29 patients in ball-spring group, and the other trials were described thoroughly. The findings seemed to indicate that the bar-clip group had the highest retention but more oral mucosa complications, while the ball-spring group had good retention and less oral mucosa complications but needed more aftercare treatments, and the magnetic group had less retention but better peri-implant outcomes. Conclusions There is inadequate evidence to prove which is the best choice for mandibular implant-supported overdentures among bar-clip, ball-spring and magnetic attachments. More controlled clinical trials are required to guide clinicians on the choice of the type of attachment in mandibular implant-supported overdenture.