Objective To find out some ideal reconstructions after total gastrectomy in experimental study of rat. Methods Sixty male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly and averagely divided into 6 groups: Roux-en-Y group (RY group), proximate jejunal pouch group (PJP group), distal jejunal pouch group (DJP group), two jejunal pouchs group (TJP group), duodenumjejunal pouch interposition group (DJPI group) and laparotomy group (L group). Body weight of rats, intestinal transit distance, adaptive changes in esophagojejunostomic mucosa and morphology changes of intestine after operation were observed and compared. Results At 2 weeks after operation, body weight in each group were significantly lower than that before operation （P＜0.05）. At 4 weeks postoperatively, body weight in PJP group, TJP group and DJPI group were significantly higher than that in RY group respectively （P＜0.05）, as well as at 8 weeks. Intestinal transit distance in PJP group was shorter than that in RY group （P＜0.05）. With regard to intestinal mucosa, TJP group and DJPI group were significantly different with RY group （P＜0.05）. Interestingly, there was no difference in each group as to refluxing esophagitis （P＞0.05）. Conclusion Proximate and two jejunal pouchs Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy seem to be ideal procedures for digestive tract reconstruction after total gastrectomy. The jejunal pouch interposition procedure seems to be same effective to PJP and TJP, but there is no preponderance over the former.
Objective To investigate the clinical meanings of lymphangiogenesis, lymph vessel invasion (LVI) and lymph node (LN) micrometastasis in gastric cancer. Methods The expression of D2-40 in 68 patients with gastric cancer of primary lesion and the expressions of CK20 and (or) CKpan in 791 lymph nodes from 51 cases which were detected by immunohistochemical staining were analyzed, as well as their clinicopathologic profiles. The relationship of lymph vessel density (LVD), LVI and LN micrometastasis with LN metastasis and other clinicopathologic parameters was analyzed respectively. Results Positive rate of LVI with HE (LVI-HE) and D2-40 (LVI-IM) staining was respectively 66.2%(45/68) and 76.5%(52/68), P=0.118. The positive rate of LVI-IM was related to deeper tumor invasion (P=0.044), later stage of TNM (P=0.003) and LN metastasis (P=0.000). Average LVD of 68 cases was (18.19±7.44)/HP. The increment of LVD was significantly associated with LVI-HE positive status （P=0.040）, LVI-IM positive status （P=0.001）, venous invasion （P=0.037）, later stage of TNM （P=0.020） and LN metastasis （P=0.001）. The survival rate of the group sharing ≥15/HP of LVD was significantly lower than that in the group sharing ≤14/HP of LVD in early period of follow-up （P=0.032）. The incidence of nodal involvement in 51 patients was increased from 74.5%(38/51) by HE staining to 88.2%(45/51) by CK (CK20 or CKpan) immunostaining. The detection rate of metastasized LN was increased from 32.0%（253/791） by HE staining to 41.5%（328/791） by CK immunostaining (Plt;0.001). The significant difference of LN micrometastasis detection rate between CK20 (8.7%) and CKpan (12.3%) was also identified (P=0.003). The increased number of LN micrometastasis was related to larger diameter of tumor (P=0.001), higher LVI-HE positive rate (P=0.040), deeper invasion of tumor (P=0.018) and later stage of TNM (P=0.012). Both LN stage and TNM stage were changed according to the detection of LN micrometastasis: Seven patients of N0 should be recognized as N1 (N0→N1)， 6 as N1→N2, 1 as N2→N3. Four patients of stage Ⅰb should be recognized as stage Ⅱ (Ⅰb→Ⅱ)， 4 as Ⅱ→Ⅲa， 3 as Ⅲa→Ⅲb， 1 as Ⅲb→Ⅳ. Conclusion Detection of D2-40 and CK in diagnosis of LVI and LN micrometastasis is better than HE staining. The combined detection of CK20 and CKpan may be much easier to find out the LN with micrometastasis. Later stage of TNM the tumor is, more frequently the LN micrometastasis happens. The relationships of LVI-IM, LVD and LN micrometastasis with LN metastasis in gastric cancer has been demonstrated. Patients with higher LVD share a lower survival rate in early period of follow-up.