west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "Bioactive glass" 5 results
  • PROMOTED VASCULARIZATION OF ENHANCED BIOACTIVE GLASS/COLLAGEN COMPOSITE SCAFFOLD

    Objective Rapid and effective vascularization of scaffolds used for bone tissue engineering is critical to bony repair. To study the cooperative and promotion effects of enhanced bioactive glass/collagen composite scaffold on vascularization for searching for a kind of el igible vascularized scaffold to repair bone defect. Methods The human umbil ical vein endothel ial cells (HUVECs) were collected from human umbil ical core, and identified through von Willebrandfactor (vWF) and CD34 immunofluorescence. The 1st passage of HUVECs were suspensed and seeded into the scaffold. The attachment and prol iferation of HUVECs on the scaffold were observed through scanning electron microscope (SEM). HUVECs were seeded on the scaffold as the experimental group, and on 96-well plate as the control group. The growth rate of HUVECs was detected through alarmarBlue at 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 days. Meanwhile, the mRNA expression levels of VEGF, fms-related tyrosine kinase 1 (Flt-1), and kinase insert domain receptor (Kdr) were detected through real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR. Twelve scaffolds were embedded subcutaneouly into 6 Sprague-Dawley rats. The enhanced scaffolds were used and the arteria and vein saphena bundle were embedded straightly through the central slot of scaffold in experimental group, and the common scaffolds were used in control group. Frozen section and HE staining of scaffolds were performed at 5 days and 10 days to observe the vascularization of embedded scaffold. Results HUVECs were identified through morphology, vWF and CD34 immunofluorescence. SEM results showed HUVECs could attach to the scaffold tightly and viably. HUVECs prol iferated actively on the scaffold in experimental group; the growth rate in experimental group was higher than that in control group at 3-11 days, showing significant differences within 5-11 days (P lt; 0.05). The real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR results showed thatthe mRNA expression levels of VEGF, Flt-1, and Kdr in experimental group were higher than those in control group at 3 days, showing significant differences (P lt; 0.05). Frozen section and HE staining of the scaffolds in experimental group showed that the embedded vessel bundle were still patency at 5 days and 10 days, that many new vessels were observed around the embedded vessel bundle and increased with time, host vessels infiltrated in the surrounding area of scaffold and fewer neo-vessels at the distant area. But there was only some fibrous tissue appeared in control group, and at 10 days, the common scaffold degradated, so few normal tissue appeared at the embedded area. Conclusion Enhanced bioactive glass/collagen composite scaffold can promote vascularization in vitro and in vivo, and may be used in bone tissue engineering.

    Release date:2016-08-31 05:43 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • EFFICACY OF BIOACTIVE GLASS AND ALLOGENIC BONE IN REPAIR OF BONE DEFECT AFTER BENIGN BONE TUMOR CURETTAGE

    Objective To compare the healing process and clinical results of bioactive glass and allogenic bone in the repair of bone defects after benign bone tumor curettage. Methods Between November 2011 and December 2012, 20 patients with benign bone tumor received bioactive glass and allogenic bone for repair of bone defects after benign bone tumor curettage. There were 17 males and 3 females, aged 9-68 years (median, 18.5 years). The mean course of disease was 3.3 months (range, 1-9 months). Pathological examination revealed that there were 7 cases of chondroblastoma, 5 cases of bone cyst, 2 cases of non-ossifying fibroma, 2 cases of enchondroma, 1 case of vascular tumor of bone, 1 case of lipoma of bone, 1 case of osteoid osteoma, and 1 case of chondromyxoid fibroma. The lesion located at the femur in 5 cases, at the tibia in 11 cases, at the humerus in 1 case, at the calcaneus in 2 cases, and at the talus in 1 case. The bioactive glass and allogenic cancellous bone were implanted in the cavity at the same time. The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) function evaluation score was used for evaluation of postoperative limb function. According to the imaging and clinical benefit, the healing processes of two kinds of implants were evaluated. The healing rate and healing time were compared. The distribution of the bioactive glass was divided into two layers: the layer close to host bone and the layer close to allogenic bone. The bone ingrowth time and bone resorption time in different layers were evaluated and compared. Results All cases were followed up 12-42 months (mean, 34.5 months). All incisions healed by first intention. There were no complications of wound infection or deep infection, rejection, nonunion of bone, fracture at bone graft site, and collapsing of articular surface. There was no tumor recurrence during follow-up. The mean MSTS functional score was 29.5 (range, 28-30) at last follow-up. Complete healing was observed in 11 cases and healing in 9 cases. The healing rates of two kinds of implants were both 100%. The healing time of bioactive glass and allogenic bone was (4.7±1.3) months and (5.2±1.6) months, respectively, showing no significant difference (t=-1.240, P=0.244). The bone ingrowth time and the bone absorption time were (3.6±0.9) months and (3.7±1.0) months in the layer close to host bone and were (4.2±1.3) months and (4.2±1.3) months in the layer close to allogenic bone, all showing no significant difference (t=1.785, P=0.097; t=1.476, P=0.172). Conclusion For the repair of bone defects after benign bone tumor curettage, bioactive glass can achieve satisfactory healing result and has good safety.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Research and application progress of bioactive glass in bone repair

    Objective To review the research and application progress of bioactive glass in bone repair. Methods The recently published literature concerning bioactive glass in bone repair was reviewed and summarized. Results Bioactive glass can classified different types, such as bioactive glass particulate, bioactive glass scaffold, bioactive glass coating, injectable bioactive glass cement, and bioactive glass delivery system. Bioactive glass has been well studied in the field of bone repair due to its excellent biological properties. Also, the remarkable progress has been made in various aspects. Conclusion Bioactive glass is a reliable material of bone repair and will play an even more important role in the future.

    Release date:2017-12-11 12:15 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Application and research status of bioactive glass in bone repair

    ObjectiveTo summarize the clinical application and research status of bioactive glass (BAG) in bone repair.MethodsThe recently published literature concerning BAG in bone repair at home and abroad was reviewed and summarized.ResultsBAG has been widely used in clinical bone repair with a favorable effectiveness. In the experimental aspect, to meet different clinical application needs, BAG has been prepared in different forms, such as particles, prosthetic coating, drug and biological factor delivery system, bone cement, and scaffold. And the significant progress has been made.ConclusionBAG has been well studied in the field of bone repair due to its excellent bone repair performance, and it is expected to become a new generation of bone repair material.

    Release date:2020-06-15 02:43 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Research progress on biocomposites based on bioactive glass

    Bioactive glass (BG) has been widely used in the preparation of artificial bone scaffolds due to its excellent biological properties and non-cytotoxicity, which can promote bone and soft tissue regeneration. However, due to the brittleness, poor mechanical strength, easy agglomeration and uncontrollable structure of glass material, its application in various fields is limited. In this regard, most current researches mainly focus on mixing BG with organic or inorganic materials by freeze-drying method, sol-gel method, etc., to improve its mechanical properties and brittleness, so as to increase its clinical application and expand its application field. This review introduces the combination of BG with natural organic materials, metallic materials and non-metallic materials, and demonstrates the latest technology and future prospects of BG composite materials through the development of scaffolds, injectable fillers, membranes, hydrogels and coatings. The previous studies show that the addition of BG improves the mechanical properties, biological activity and regeneration potential of the composites, and broadens the application of BG in the field of bone tissue engineering. By reviewing the recent BG researches on bone regeneration, the research potential of new materials is demonstrated, in order to provide a reference for future related research.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content