ObjectiveTo review the research progress of modern biological dressings. MethodsThe related literature at home and abroad was reviewed, analyzed, and summarized in the progress of biological dressing situation and various types of biological dressing research. ResultsCompared with the traditional dressing, the biological dressing can greatly promote wound healing. Biological dressings are mainly divided into the natural materials, artificial synthetic materials, and drug loaded dressings. The natural material dressings are mainly the alginate dressing, this kind of dressing can promote wound healing, which has been confirmed by a large number of studies. The artificial synthetic materials include film dressings, liquid, water colloids, gels, and foam, each has its own advantages and disadvantages, which can be chosen according to need. The drug dressing can play the role of drug loading, and further promote the wound healing; using microcapsule technology to construct the dressing and choosing Chinese medicine as drugs is the research direction of load. ConclusionThe experiment and clinical application of biological dressing are many types, clinical application prospect is wide, but each has its own advantages and disadvantages, further study is needed to improve its efficacy.
Objective To explore the appl ication of damage control surgery (DCS) strategy in the treatment of severe burn-trauma combined injury. Methods From January 2004 to December 2009, 28 patients with severe burn-trauma combined injury received salvage treatment according to DCS, including 12 cases of burn combining injury at 2 sites, 6 cases ofburn combining injury at 3 sites, and 10 cases of burn combining injury at 4 sites or above. There were 18 males and 10 females with a median age of 39.5 years (range, 8-56 years). The burn area was 15% to 56% of total body surface area. The injury severity score a (ISS) was 25 to 56, and the traumatic index was 17 to 24. Lethal triad syndrome occurred in all patients. Of them, 16 cases were on admission immediatly after first-aid, and 12 cases were thansferred from other hospitals. The time from injury to hospital ization was 20 minutes to 36 hours. All patients were treated by immediate fluid resuscitation and emergent operation to control hemorrhage and contaminations. Biological dressings were used to seal the wounds provisionally. The systemic therapy was carried out as soon as the vital signs of the patients became stable. Results In 26 survivors, 23 achieved wound heal ing by first intention, 3 had a l ittle residual wound at discharge. The hospital ization days were 31 to 398 days (62 days on average). However, 1 patient died of multiple organ failure, another 1 patient died of severe cerebral trauma with refractory shock. Conclusion The DCS strategy is effective in reducing mortal ity of patients with severe burn-trauma combined injury.
Objective To observe clinical effects of burn wounds treatment with bovine amnion and to screen the best method of preparing and storing of bovine amnion. Methods From January 2004 to January 2005,We selected randomly 58 patients with superficial Ⅱ° wound, deepⅡ° wound, autografting area for removal of eschars and tangential excision, fetching skin area or residual burn wound . Using auto-control, every burn wound was divided into 3 parts and was treated with 3 dressings: bovine amnion dealt with by 0.1% chlorhexidine（group A）, bovine amnion dealt with by 0.4% glutaraldehyde（group B） and vaseline gauze dressing（group C as control）. The clinical effects were compared between different groupsand the method of preparing and storing bovine amnion was evaluated. Results The dressing texture of group A was softer than that of group B, and its flexibility was fine. The pretreatment was not necessary for dressing in group A. When the dressing was used on burn wounds in groups A and B, painwas slight, but pain was obvious in group C; healing time in groups A and B was much less than that in group C, showing statistically significant difference(P＜0.01). There was no statistically significant difference in healing time between groups A and B (P＞0.05). The infection ratio of burn wound in deepⅡ° wound and residual burn wound of groups A and B is much lower than that of group C, showing statistically significant difference (P＜0.05); in theother burn wounds there was no significant difference (P＞0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between groups A and B (P＞0.05). Conclusion Bovine amnion could make benefit on burn wounds healing, reduce infection ratio of burn wounds, could be used on different kinds of burn wounds. The clinical effect between bovine amnion dealt with by glutaraldehyde and by chlorhexidine is similar. Whereas the latter is more easy to be popularized.